Calculating Relative Correction Factors for Quantitative Analysis with HILIC-HPLC-ELSD Method: Eight Fructooligosaccharides of Morinda Officinalis as a Case Study

Objective. Because the response of evaporating light scattering detector (ELSD) being in a nonlinear mode, there is no consensus on the method of calculating its relative correction factors (RCF), which limits the application of the quantitative analysis for multi-components by a single marker (QAMS...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lihong Zhou, Hui Ni, Linlin Zhang, Wenyong Wu, Tengqian Zhang, Qi Su, Jing Zhou, Huali Long, Jinjun Hou, Jiyu Gong, Wanying Wu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8022473
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849402652635430912
author Lihong Zhou
Hui Ni
Linlin Zhang
Wenyong Wu
Tengqian Zhang
Qi Su
Jing Zhou
Huali Long
Jinjun Hou
Jiyu Gong
Wanying Wu
author_facet Lihong Zhou
Hui Ni
Linlin Zhang
Wenyong Wu
Tengqian Zhang
Qi Su
Jing Zhou
Huali Long
Jinjun Hou
Jiyu Gong
Wanying Wu
author_sort Lihong Zhou
collection DOAJ
description Objective. Because the response of evaporating light scattering detector (ELSD) being in a nonlinear mode, there is no consensus on the method of calculating its relative correction factors (RCF), which limits the application of the quantitative analysis for multi-components by a single marker (QAMS) with LC-ELSD. Methods. Using eight fructooligosaccharides of Morinda officinalis as a case study, the nystose (GF3) as a single standard was adopted to develop a QAMS method to simultaneously determine the other seven fructooligosaccharides with HILIC-HPLC-ELSD method. Six calculation methods of RCF were investigated to select the most reasonable method. The relative error of content between the QAMS and the external standard method (ESM) obtained from 30 batches of samples was used as an indicator to evaluate the six methods. Finally, a chemometrics analysis was performed to find the differential components among MO and its three processing products. Results. It was first reported that only one calculation method was scientific for calculating RCF for the LC-ELSD method. The RCFs of GF3 to the other seven fructooligosaccharides (GF1–GF8) were obtained as 0.86, 0.91, 0.93, 1.05, 1.15, 1.12, and 1.18, respectively. The QAMS of eight fructooligosaccharides of Morinda officinalis was validated with good linearity (R2 > 0.9998) and accepted the accuracy of 95–105% (RSD < 1.81%) based on nystose. Finally, Morinda officinalis and its three processed products were distinguished and could be differed based on the content of the eight fructooligosaccharides. Conclusion. The scientific calculation method of RCF would be of great significance for developing the QAMS method in Pharmacopoeia when performing the LC-ELSD method.
format Article
id doaj-art-967aca82a07d4eb39375e70dbf1d83e2
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-8873
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry
spelling doaj-art-967aca82a07d4eb39375e70dbf1d83e22025-08-20T03:37:29ZengWileyJournal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry2090-88732022-01-01202210.1155/2022/8022473Calculating Relative Correction Factors for Quantitative Analysis with HILIC-HPLC-ELSD Method: Eight Fructooligosaccharides of Morinda Officinalis as a Case StudyLihong Zhou0Hui Ni1Linlin Zhang2Wenyong Wu3Tengqian Zhang4Qi Su5Jing Zhou6Huali Long7Jinjun Hou8Jiyu Gong9Wanying Wu10College of PharmacyNational Engineering Research Center of TCM Standardization TechnologyNational Engineering Research Center of TCM Standardization TechnologyNational Engineering Research Center of TCM Standardization TechnologyNational Engineering Research Center of TCM Standardization TechnologyNational Engineering Research Center of TCM Standardization TechnologyNational Engineering Research Center of TCM Standardization TechnologyNational Engineering Research Center of TCM Standardization TechnologyNational Engineering Research Center of TCM Standardization TechnologyCollege of PharmacyNational Engineering Research Center of TCM Standardization TechnologyObjective. Because the response of evaporating light scattering detector (ELSD) being in a nonlinear mode, there is no consensus on the method of calculating its relative correction factors (RCF), which limits the application of the quantitative analysis for multi-components by a single marker (QAMS) with LC-ELSD. Methods. Using eight fructooligosaccharides of Morinda officinalis as a case study, the nystose (GF3) as a single standard was adopted to develop a QAMS method to simultaneously determine the other seven fructooligosaccharides with HILIC-HPLC-ELSD method. Six calculation methods of RCF were investigated to select the most reasonable method. The relative error of content between the QAMS and the external standard method (ESM) obtained from 30 batches of samples was used as an indicator to evaluate the six methods. Finally, a chemometrics analysis was performed to find the differential components among MO and its three processing products. Results. It was first reported that only one calculation method was scientific for calculating RCF for the LC-ELSD method. The RCFs of GF3 to the other seven fructooligosaccharides (GF1–GF8) were obtained as 0.86, 0.91, 0.93, 1.05, 1.15, 1.12, and 1.18, respectively. The QAMS of eight fructooligosaccharides of Morinda officinalis was validated with good linearity (R2 > 0.9998) and accepted the accuracy of 95–105% (RSD < 1.81%) based on nystose. Finally, Morinda officinalis and its three processed products were distinguished and could be differed based on the content of the eight fructooligosaccharides. Conclusion. The scientific calculation method of RCF would be of great significance for developing the QAMS method in Pharmacopoeia when performing the LC-ELSD method.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8022473
spellingShingle Lihong Zhou
Hui Ni
Linlin Zhang
Wenyong Wu
Tengqian Zhang
Qi Su
Jing Zhou
Huali Long
Jinjun Hou
Jiyu Gong
Wanying Wu
Calculating Relative Correction Factors for Quantitative Analysis with HILIC-HPLC-ELSD Method: Eight Fructooligosaccharides of Morinda Officinalis as a Case Study
Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry
title Calculating Relative Correction Factors for Quantitative Analysis with HILIC-HPLC-ELSD Method: Eight Fructooligosaccharides of Morinda Officinalis as a Case Study
title_full Calculating Relative Correction Factors for Quantitative Analysis with HILIC-HPLC-ELSD Method: Eight Fructooligosaccharides of Morinda Officinalis as a Case Study
title_fullStr Calculating Relative Correction Factors for Quantitative Analysis with HILIC-HPLC-ELSD Method: Eight Fructooligosaccharides of Morinda Officinalis as a Case Study
title_full_unstemmed Calculating Relative Correction Factors for Quantitative Analysis with HILIC-HPLC-ELSD Method: Eight Fructooligosaccharides of Morinda Officinalis as a Case Study
title_short Calculating Relative Correction Factors for Quantitative Analysis with HILIC-HPLC-ELSD Method: Eight Fructooligosaccharides of Morinda Officinalis as a Case Study
title_sort calculating relative correction factors for quantitative analysis with hilic hplc elsd method eight fructooligosaccharides of morinda officinalis as a case study
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8022473
work_keys_str_mv AT lihongzhou calculatingrelativecorrectionfactorsforquantitativeanalysiswithhilichplcelsdmethodeightfructooligosaccharidesofmorindaofficinalisasacasestudy
AT huini calculatingrelativecorrectionfactorsforquantitativeanalysiswithhilichplcelsdmethodeightfructooligosaccharidesofmorindaofficinalisasacasestudy
AT linlinzhang calculatingrelativecorrectionfactorsforquantitativeanalysiswithhilichplcelsdmethodeightfructooligosaccharidesofmorindaofficinalisasacasestudy
AT wenyongwu calculatingrelativecorrectionfactorsforquantitativeanalysiswithhilichplcelsdmethodeightfructooligosaccharidesofmorindaofficinalisasacasestudy
AT tengqianzhang calculatingrelativecorrectionfactorsforquantitativeanalysiswithhilichplcelsdmethodeightfructooligosaccharidesofmorindaofficinalisasacasestudy
AT qisu calculatingrelativecorrectionfactorsforquantitativeanalysiswithhilichplcelsdmethodeightfructooligosaccharidesofmorindaofficinalisasacasestudy
AT jingzhou calculatingrelativecorrectionfactorsforquantitativeanalysiswithhilichplcelsdmethodeightfructooligosaccharidesofmorindaofficinalisasacasestudy
AT hualilong calculatingrelativecorrectionfactorsforquantitativeanalysiswithhilichplcelsdmethodeightfructooligosaccharidesofmorindaofficinalisasacasestudy
AT jinjunhou calculatingrelativecorrectionfactorsforquantitativeanalysiswithhilichplcelsdmethodeightfructooligosaccharidesofmorindaofficinalisasacasestudy
AT jiyugong calculatingrelativecorrectionfactorsforquantitativeanalysiswithhilichplcelsdmethodeightfructooligosaccharidesofmorindaofficinalisasacasestudy
AT wanyingwu calculatingrelativecorrectionfactorsforquantitativeanalysiswithhilichplcelsdmethodeightfructooligosaccharidesofmorindaofficinalisasacasestudy