When AI goes wrong: Fatal errors in oncological research reviewing assistance Open AI based

In this letter to the editor, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, specifically the Chat-GPT based “Review Assistant” by Elsevier, for reviewing scientific articles is discussed. While the tool has many benefits such as detecting linguistic and typographical errors in manuscripts, it...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marwan Al-Raeei
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-06-01
Series:Oral Oncology Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772906024001389
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841553757181050880
author Marwan Al-Raeei
author_facet Marwan Al-Raeei
author_sort Marwan Al-Raeei
collection DOAJ
description In this letter to the editor, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, specifically the Chat-GPT based “Review Assistant” by Elsevier, for reviewing scientific articles is discussed. While the tool has many benefits such as detecting linguistic and typographical errors in manuscripts, it also has limitations. An example is highlighted where the AI gave an incorrect and potentially dangerous answer regarding the bond energies of molecules in an oral tumor. This mistake shows that the use of AI for scientific research evaluation can be a double-edged sword, as it may provide inaccurate information that could have serious consequences.
format Article
id doaj-art-9657056f6b7741b5917a6405f4b67c12
institution Kabale University
issn 2772-9060
language English
publishDate 2024-06-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Oral Oncology Reports
spelling doaj-art-9657056f6b7741b5917a6405f4b67c122025-01-09T06:15:41ZengElsevierOral Oncology Reports2772-90602024-06-0110100292When AI goes wrong: Fatal errors in oncological research reviewing assistance Open AI basedMarwan Al-Raeei0Damascus University, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic.; Damascus University, Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic; International University for Science and Technology, Ghabagheb, Syrian Arab RepublicIn this letter to the editor, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, specifically the Chat-GPT based “Review Assistant” by Elsevier, for reviewing scientific articles is discussed. While the tool has many benefits such as detecting linguistic and typographical errors in manuscripts, it also has limitations. An example is highlighted where the AI gave an incorrect and potentially dangerous answer regarding the bond energies of molecules in an oral tumor. This mistake shows that the use of AI for scientific research evaluation can be a double-edged sword, as it may provide inaccurate information that could have serious consequences.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772906024001389Artificial intelligencePeer reviewReviewer assistantAIChat GPTOpen AI
spellingShingle Marwan Al-Raeei
When AI goes wrong: Fatal errors in oncological research reviewing assistance Open AI based
Oral Oncology Reports
Artificial intelligence
Peer review
Reviewer assistant
AI
Chat GPT
Open AI
title When AI goes wrong: Fatal errors in oncological research reviewing assistance Open AI based
title_full When AI goes wrong: Fatal errors in oncological research reviewing assistance Open AI based
title_fullStr When AI goes wrong: Fatal errors in oncological research reviewing assistance Open AI based
title_full_unstemmed When AI goes wrong: Fatal errors in oncological research reviewing assistance Open AI based
title_short When AI goes wrong: Fatal errors in oncological research reviewing assistance Open AI based
title_sort when ai goes wrong fatal errors in oncological research reviewing assistance open ai based
topic Artificial intelligence
Peer review
Reviewer assistant
AI
Chat GPT
Open AI
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772906024001389
work_keys_str_mv AT marwanalraeei whenaigoeswrongfatalerrorsinoncologicalresearchreviewingassistanceopenaibased