Influence of underwater light fields on pigment characteristics in the Baltic Sea - results of statistical analysis

Changes in phytoplankton pigment concentrations in case 2 waters (such as those of the Baltic Sea) were analysed in relation to the lightintensity and its spectral distribution in the water. The analyses were based on sets of empirical measurements containing two typesof data: chlorophyll and carote...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joanna Stoń-Egiert, Roman Majchrowski2, Mirosław Darecki, Alicja Kosakowska, Mirosława Ostrowska
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institute of Oceanology of the Polish Academy of Sciences 2012-02-01
Series:Oceanologia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.iopan.gda.pl/oceanologia/54_1.html#A1
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849314438706888704
author Joanna Stoń-Egiert
Roman Majchrowski2,
Mirosław Darecki
Alicja Kosakowska
Mirosława Ostrowska
author_facet Joanna Stoń-Egiert
Roman Majchrowski2,
Mirosław Darecki
Alicja Kosakowska
Mirosława Ostrowska
author_sort Joanna Stoń-Egiert
collection DOAJ
description Changes in phytoplankton pigment concentrations in case 2 waters (such as those of the Baltic Sea) were analysed in relation to the lightintensity and its spectral distribution in the water. The analyses were based on sets of empirical measurements containing two typesof data: chlorophyll and carotenoid concentrations obtained by HPLC, and the distribution of underwater light fields measured with a MER2049 spectrophotometer - collected during 27 research cruises on r/v "Oceania" in 1999-2004. Statistical analysis yielded relationshipsbetween the total relative (to chlorophyll <i>a</i> concentrations) concentrations of major groups of phytoplankton pigments andoptical depth &tau;, between the total relative concentrations of major groups of photosynthetic pigments (chlorophylls <i>b</i> (C<sub>chl <i>b</i> tot</sub> / C<sub>chl <i>a</i> tot</sub>), chlorophylls <i>c</i> (C<sub>chl <i>c</i> tot</sub> / C<sub>chl <i>a</i> tot</sub>)and photosynthetic carotenoids (C<sub>PSC tot</sub> / C<sub>chl <i>a</i> tot</sub>)) and the spectral fitting function (the "chromatic acclimation factor"),and between the total relative concentrations of photoprotective carotenoids (C<sub>PPC tot</sub> / C<sub>chl <i>a</i> tot</sub>) in Baltic waters and the potentially destructive radiation (PDR), defined as the absolute amount of energy in the blue part of the spectrum (400-480 nm) absorbed by unit mass ofchlorophyll <i>a</i>. The best approximations were obtained for the total chlorophyll <i>c</i> content, while the relative estimation errors were thesmallest (&sigma;_ = 34.6%) for the approximation to optical depth and spectral fitting function. The largest errors related to the approximation ofchlorophyll <i>b</i> concentrations: &sigma;_ = 56.7% with respect to optical depth and 57.3% to the spectral fitting function).<br> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;A comparative analysis of the relative (to chlorophyll <i>a</i> content) concentrations of the main groups of pigments and the corresponding irradiance characteristics in ocean (case 1) waters and Baltic waters (case 2 waters) was also carried out. The distribution of C<sub>chl <i>b</i> tot</sub> / C<sub>chl <i>a</i> tot</sub> ratios with respect to optical depth reveals a decreasing trend with increasing &tau; for Baltic data, which is characteristic of photoprotective pigments and the reverse of the trend in oceans. In the case of the C<sub>chl <i>c</i> tot</sub> approximations, the logarithmic statistical error is lower for Baltic waters than for case 1waters: &sigma;_ = 34.6% for Baltic data and &sigma;_ = 39.4% for ocean data. In relation to photoprotective carotenoids (C<sub>PPC</sub>), &sigma;_ takes a value of 38.4% forBaltic waters and 36.1% for ocean waters. The relative errors of the approximated concentrations of different pigment groups are larger than those obtainedfor ocean waters. The only exception is chlorophyll <i>c</i>, for which the logarithmic statistical error is about 8.8% lower (&sigma;_ = 34.6% for Baltic waters and 38.2% for ocean waters). Analysis of the errors resulting from the approximations of the photoprotective carotenoid content, depending on the energy characteristicsof the underwater irradiance in the short-range part of PAR, showed that the relative errors are 1.3 times higher for Baltic waters than for ocean waters: &sigma;_ = 38.4%for Baltic waters and 32.0% for ocean waters.
format Article
id doaj-art-9642fd1803a4456fb049673f66cf99cd
institution Kabale University
issn 0078-3234
language English
publishDate 2012-02-01
publisher Institute of Oceanology of the Polish Academy of Sciences
record_format Article
series Oceanologia
spelling doaj-art-9642fd1803a4456fb049673f66cf99cd2025-08-20T03:52:28ZengInstitute of Oceanology of the Polish Academy of SciencesOceanologia0078-32342012-02-01541727Influence of underwater light fields on pigment characteristics in the Baltic Sea - results of statistical analysisJoanna Stoń-EgiertRoman Majchrowski2,Mirosław DareckiAlicja KosakowskaMirosława OstrowskaChanges in phytoplankton pigment concentrations in case 2 waters (such as those of the Baltic Sea) were analysed in relation to the lightintensity and its spectral distribution in the water. The analyses were based on sets of empirical measurements containing two typesof data: chlorophyll and carotenoid concentrations obtained by HPLC, and the distribution of underwater light fields measured with a MER2049 spectrophotometer - collected during 27 research cruises on r/v "Oceania" in 1999-2004. Statistical analysis yielded relationshipsbetween the total relative (to chlorophyll <i>a</i> concentrations) concentrations of major groups of phytoplankton pigments andoptical depth &tau;, between the total relative concentrations of major groups of photosynthetic pigments (chlorophylls <i>b</i> (C<sub>chl <i>b</i> tot</sub> / C<sub>chl <i>a</i> tot</sub>), chlorophylls <i>c</i> (C<sub>chl <i>c</i> tot</sub> / C<sub>chl <i>a</i> tot</sub>)and photosynthetic carotenoids (C<sub>PSC tot</sub> / C<sub>chl <i>a</i> tot</sub>)) and the spectral fitting function (the "chromatic acclimation factor"),and between the total relative concentrations of photoprotective carotenoids (C<sub>PPC tot</sub> / C<sub>chl <i>a</i> tot</sub>) in Baltic waters and the potentially destructive radiation (PDR), defined as the absolute amount of energy in the blue part of the spectrum (400-480 nm) absorbed by unit mass ofchlorophyll <i>a</i>. The best approximations were obtained for the total chlorophyll <i>c</i> content, while the relative estimation errors were thesmallest (&sigma;_ = 34.6%) for the approximation to optical depth and spectral fitting function. The largest errors related to the approximation ofchlorophyll <i>b</i> concentrations: &sigma;_ = 56.7% with respect to optical depth and 57.3% to the spectral fitting function).<br> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;A comparative analysis of the relative (to chlorophyll <i>a</i> content) concentrations of the main groups of pigments and the corresponding irradiance characteristics in ocean (case 1) waters and Baltic waters (case 2 waters) was also carried out. The distribution of C<sub>chl <i>b</i> tot</sub> / C<sub>chl <i>a</i> tot</sub> ratios with respect to optical depth reveals a decreasing trend with increasing &tau; for Baltic data, which is characteristic of photoprotective pigments and the reverse of the trend in oceans. In the case of the C<sub>chl <i>c</i> tot</sub> approximations, the logarithmic statistical error is lower for Baltic waters than for case 1waters: &sigma;_ = 34.6% for Baltic data and &sigma;_ = 39.4% for ocean data. In relation to photoprotective carotenoids (C<sub>PPC</sub>), &sigma;_ takes a value of 38.4% forBaltic waters and 36.1% for ocean waters. The relative errors of the approximated concentrations of different pigment groups are larger than those obtainedfor ocean waters. The only exception is chlorophyll <i>c</i>, for which the logarithmic statistical error is about 8.8% lower (&sigma;_ = 34.6% for Baltic waters and 38.2% for ocean waters). Analysis of the errors resulting from the approximations of the photoprotective carotenoid content, depending on the energy characteristicsof the underwater irradiance in the short-range part of PAR, showed that the relative errors are 1.3 times higher for Baltic waters than for ocean waters: &sigma;_ = 38.4%for Baltic waters and 32.0% for ocean waters.http://www.iopan.gda.pl/oceanologia/54_1.html#A1pigmentsphytoplanktonunderwater irradiancestatistical analysisBaltic Sea
spellingShingle Joanna Stoń-Egiert
Roman Majchrowski2,
Mirosław Darecki
Alicja Kosakowska
Mirosława Ostrowska
Influence of underwater light fields on pigment characteristics in the Baltic Sea - results of statistical analysis
Oceanologia
pigments
phytoplankton
underwater irradiance
statistical analysis
Baltic Sea
title Influence of underwater light fields on pigment characteristics in the Baltic Sea - results of statistical analysis
title_full Influence of underwater light fields on pigment characteristics in the Baltic Sea - results of statistical analysis
title_fullStr Influence of underwater light fields on pigment characteristics in the Baltic Sea - results of statistical analysis
title_full_unstemmed Influence of underwater light fields on pigment characteristics in the Baltic Sea - results of statistical analysis
title_short Influence of underwater light fields on pigment characteristics in the Baltic Sea - results of statistical analysis
title_sort influence of underwater light fields on pigment characteristics in the baltic sea results of statistical analysis
topic pigments
phytoplankton
underwater irradiance
statistical analysis
Baltic Sea
url http://www.iopan.gda.pl/oceanologia/54_1.html#A1
work_keys_str_mv AT joannastonegiert influenceofunderwaterlightfieldsonpigmentcharacteristicsinthebalticsearesultsofstatisticalanalysis
AT romanmajchrowski2 influenceofunderwaterlightfieldsonpigmentcharacteristicsinthebalticsearesultsofstatisticalanalysis
AT mirosławdarecki influenceofunderwaterlightfieldsonpigmentcharacteristicsinthebalticsearesultsofstatisticalanalysis
AT alicjakosakowska influenceofunderwaterlightfieldsonpigmentcharacteristicsinthebalticsearesultsofstatisticalanalysis
AT mirosławaostrowska influenceofunderwaterlightfieldsonpigmentcharacteristicsinthebalticsearesultsofstatisticalanalysis