Exploring willingness to use adverse drug reaction reporting systems: a multicentre qualitative study in China based on the technology acceptance model and task-technology fit integration approach

Background Adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting systems are critical for monitoring and managing drug safety. However, various factors influence the willingness to use these systems. This study aimed to investigate the willingness to use ADR reporting systems through an integrated model of the Tech...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xue Yang, Wan Zhang, Zhao Yin, Xiaobo Chen, Xudong Xia, Jiayi Du, Weigao Cheng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2024-10-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/10/e087701.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849720899079503872
author Xue Yang
Wan Zhang
Zhao Yin
Xiaobo Chen
Xudong Xia
Jiayi Du
Weigao Cheng
author_facet Xue Yang
Wan Zhang
Zhao Yin
Xiaobo Chen
Xudong Xia
Jiayi Du
Weigao Cheng
author_sort Xue Yang
collection DOAJ
description Background Adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting systems are critical for monitoring and managing drug safety. However, various factors influence the willingness to use these systems. This study aimed to investigate the willingness to use ADR reporting systems through an integrated model of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Task-Technology Fit (TTF) theory, conducting a multicentre qualitative study from the user’s perspective.Methods This study used qualitative research methods, including in-depth interviews with clinicians, nurses, pharmacists and administrators who reported ADRs through the National Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring System (NADRMS) and the China Hospital Pharmacovigilance System (CHPS). The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using QDA Miner software for data management and thematic analysis.Results Eighteen healthcare workers from five healthcare organisations participated in the study. They found the ease of use and usefulness of the current NADRMS and CHPS to be acceptable. The essential technical requirements identified included accuracy, standardisation, timeliness and confidentiality. However, challenges such as inaccurate information capture, unstable interfacing with medical record systems, low reporting efficiency and lack of data sharing were highlighted. Overall, front-line healthcare workers exhibited a generally negative attitude towards using NADRMS and CHPS, driven more by necessity than preference. Factors influencing their willingness to use these systems included ease of use, practicality, risk perception and social impact, with varying attitudes and requirements observed between user groups.Conclusion This study provides practical recommendations that can be readily implemented to enhance the effectiveness and sustainability of ADR reporting systems. While front-line users in China acknowledged the systems’ ease of use and usefulness, they also noted significant gaps in technological adaptation. They expressed the need for improvements in data openness and sharing, accessibility and system intelligence.
format Article
id doaj-art-9642bcbeac7a4bde83432e62302e64c9
institution DOAJ
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2024-10-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-9642bcbeac7a4bde83432e62302e64c92025-08-20T03:11:51ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552024-10-01141010.1136/bmjopen-2024-087701Exploring willingness to use adverse drug reaction reporting systems: a multicentre qualitative study in China based on the technology acceptance model and task-technology fit integration approachXue Yang0Wan Zhang1Zhao Yin2Xiaobo Chen3Xudong Xia4Jiayi Du5Weigao Cheng6Center for Drug Evaluation of Henan, Zhengzhou, Henan, ChinaDepartment of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China4 Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, ChinaCenter for Drug Evaluation of Henan, Zhengzhou, Henan, ChinaCenter for Drug Evaluation of Henan, Zhengzhou, Henan, China2 Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, ChinaCenter for Drug Evaluation of Henan, Zhengzhou, Henan, ChinaBackground Adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting systems are critical for monitoring and managing drug safety. However, various factors influence the willingness to use these systems. This study aimed to investigate the willingness to use ADR reporting systems through an integrated model of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Task-Technology Fit (TTF) theory, conducting a multicentre qualitative study from the user’s perspective.Methods This study used qualitative research methods, including in-depth interviews with clinicians, nurses, pharmacists and administrators who reported ADRs through the National Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring System (NADRMS) and the China Hospital Pharmacovigilance System (CHPS). The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using QDA Miner software for data management and thematic analysis.Results Eighteen healthcare workers from five healthcare organisations participated in the study. They found the ease of use and usefulness of the current NADRMS and CHPS to be acceptable. The essential technical requirements identified included accuracy, standardisation, timeliness and confidentiality. However, challenges such as inaccurate information capture, unstable interfacing with medical record systems, low reporting efficiency and lack of data sharing were highlighted. Overall, front-line healthcare workers exhibited a generally negative attitude towards using NADRMS and CHPS, driven more by necessity than preference. Factors influencing their willingness to use these systems included ease of use, practicality, risk perception and social impact, with varying attitudes and requirements observed between user groups.Conclusion This study provides practical recommendations that can be readily implemented to enhance the effectiveness and sustainability of ADR reporting systems. While front-line users in China acknowledged the systems’ ease of use and usefulness, they also noted significant gaps in technological adaptation. They expressed the need for improvements in data openness and sharing, accessibility and system intelligence.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/10/e087701.full
spellingShingle Xue Yang
Wan Zhang
Zhao Yin
Xiaobo Chen
Xudong Xia
Jiayi Du
Weigao Cheng
Exploring willingness to use adverse drug reaction reporting systems: a multicentre qualitative study in China based on the technology acceptance model and task-technology fit integration approach
BMJ Open
title Exploring willingness to use adverse drug reaction reporting systems: a multicentre qualitative study in China based on the technology acceptance model and task-technology fit integration approach
title_full Exploring willingness to use adverse drug reaction reporting systems: a multicentre qualitative study in China based on the technology acceptance model and task-technology fit integration approach
title_fullStr Exploring willingness to use adverse drug reaction reporting systems: a multicentre qualitative study in China based on the technology acceptance model and task-technology fit integration approach
title_full_unstemmed Exploring willingness to use adverse drug reaction reporting systems: a multicentre qualitative study in China based on the technology acceptance model and task-technology fit integration approach
title_short Exploring willingness to use adverse drug reaction reporting systems: a multicentre qualitative study in China based on the technology acceptance model and task-technology fit integration approach
title_sort exploring willingness to use adverse drug reaction reporting systems a multicentre qualitative study in china based on the technology acceptance model and task technology fit integration approach
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/10/e087701.full
work_keys_str_mv AT xueyang exploringwillingnesstouseadversedrugreactionreportingsystemsamulticentrequalitativestudyinchinabasedonthetechnologyacceptancemodelandtasktechnologyfitintegrationapproach
AT wanzhang exploringwillingnesstouseadversedrugreactionreportingsystemsamulticentrequalitativestudyinchinabasedonthetechnologyacceptancemodelandtasktechnologyfitintegrationapproach
AT zhaoyin exploringwillingnesstouseadversedrugreactionreportingsystemsamulticentrequalitativestudyinchinabasedonthetechnologyacceptancemodelandtasktechnologyfitintegrationapproach
AT xiaobochen exploringwillingnesstouseadversedrugreactionreportingsystemsamulticentrequalitativestudyinchinabasedonthetechnologyacceptancemodelandtasktechnologyfitintegrationapproach
AT xudongxia exploringwillingnesstouseadversedrugreactionreportingsystemsamulticentrequalitativestudyinchinabasedonthetechnologyacceptancemodelandtasktechnologyfitintegrationapproach
AT jiayidu exploringwillingnesstouseadversedrugreactionreportingsystemsamulticentrequalitativestudyinchinabasedonthetechnologyacceptancemodelandtasktechnologyfitintegrationapproach
AT weigaocheng exploringwillingnesstouseadversedrugreactionreportingsystemsamulticentrequalitativestudyinchinabasedonthetechnologyacceptancemodelandtasktechnologyfitintegrationapproach