An extreme mutational hotspot in nlpD depends on transcriptional induction of rpoS.

Mutation rate varies within and between genomes. Within genomes, tracts of nucleotides, including short sequence repeats and palindromes, can cause localised elevation of mutation rate. Additional mechanisms remain poorly understood. Here we report an instance of extreme mutational bias in Pseudomon...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrew D Farr, Christina Vasileiou, Peter A Lind, Paul B Rainey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2025-01-01
Series:PLoS Genetics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1011572
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850145060294754304
author Andrew D Farr
Christina Vasileiou
Peter A Lind
Paul B Rainey
author_facet Andrew D Farr
Christina Vasileiou
Peter A Lind
Paul B Rainey
author_sort Andrew D Farr
collection DOAJ
description Mutation rate varies within and between genomes. Within genomes, tracts of nucleotides, including short sequence repeats and palindromes, can cause localised elevation of mutation rate. Additional mechanisms remain poorly understood. Here we report an instance of extreme mutational bias in Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 associated with a single base-pair change in nlpD. These mutants frequently evolve in static microcosms, and have a cell-chaining (CC) phenotype. Analysis of 153 replicate populations revealed 137 independent instances of a C565T loss-of-function mutation at codon 189 (CAG to TAG (Q189*)). Fitness measures of alternative nlpD mutants did not explain the deterministic evolution of C565T mutants. Recognising that transcription can be mutagenic, and that codon 189 overlaps with a predicted promoter (rpoSp) for the adjacent stationary phase sigma factor, rpoS, transcription across this promoter region was measured. This confirmed rpoSp is induced in stationary phase and that C565T mutation caused significant elevation of transcription. The latter provided opportunity to determine the C565T mutation rate using a reporter-gene fused to rpoSp. Fluctuation assays estimate the C565T mutation rate to be ~5,000-fold higher than expected. In Pseudomonas, transcription of rpoS requires the positive activator PsrA, which we show also holds for SBW25. Fluctuation assays performed in a ∆psrA background showed a ~60-fold reduction in mutation rate confirming that the elevated rate of mutation at C565T mutation rate is dependent on induction of transcription. This hotspot suggests a generalisable phenomenon where the induction of transcription causes elevated mutation rates within defining regions of promoters.
format Article
id doaj-art-9632b0f29d8f4692b0eada9c8e8a2a19
institution OA Journals
issn 1553-7390
1553-7404
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS Genetics
spelling doaj-art-9632b0f29d8f4692b0eada9c8e8a2a192025-08-20T02:28:11ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Genetics1553-73901553-74042025-01-01211e101157210.1371/journal.pgen.1011572An extreme mutational hotspot in nlpD depends on transcriptional induction of rpoS.Andrew D FarrChristina VasileiouPeter A LindPaul B RaineyMutation rate varies within and between genomes. Within genomes, tracts of nucleotides, including short sequence repeats and palindromes, can cause localised elevation of mutation rate. Additional mechanisms remain poorly understood. Here we report an instance of extreme mutational bias in Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 associated with a single base-pair change in nlpD. These mutants frequently evolve in static microcosms, and have a cell-chaining (CC) phenotype. Analysis of 153 replicate populations revealed 137 independent instances of a C565T loss-of-function mutation at codon 189 (CAG to TAG (Q189*)). Fitness measures of alternative nlpD mutants did not explain the deterministic evolution of C565T mutants. Recognising that transcription can be mutagenic, and that codon 189 overlaps with a predicted promoter (rpoSp) for the adjacent stationary phase sigma factor, rpoS, transcription across this promoter region was measured. This confirmed rpoSp is induced in stationary phase and that C565T mutation caused significant elevation of transcription. The latter provided opportunity to determine the C565T mutation rate using a reporter-gene fused to rpoSp. Fluctuation assays estimate the C565T mutation rate to be ~5,000-fold higher than expected. In Pseudomonas, transcription of rpoS requires the positive activator PsrA, which we show also holds for SBW25. Fluctuation assays performed in a ∆psrA background showed a ~60-fold reduction in mutation rate confirming that the elevated rate of mutation at C565T mutation rate is dependent on induction of transcription. This hotspot suggests a generalisable phenomenon where the induction of transcription causes elevated mutation rates within defining regions of promoters.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1011572
spellingShingle Andrew D Farr
Christina Vasileiou
Peter A Lind
Paul B Rainey
An extreme mutational hotspot in nlpD depends on transcriptional induction of rpoS.
PLoS Genetics
title An extreme mutational hotspot in nlpD depends on transcriptional induction of rpoS.
title_full An extreme mutational hotspot in nlpD depends on transcriptional induction of rpoS.
title_fullStr An extreme mutational hotspot in nlpD depends on transcriptional induction of rpoS.
title_full_unstemmed An extreme mutational hotspot in nlpD depends on transcriptional induction of rpoS.
title_short An extreme mutational hotspot in nlpD depends on transcriptional induction of rpoS.
title_sort extreme mutational hotspot in nlpd depends on transcriptional induction of rpos
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1011572
work_keys_str_mv AT andrewdfarr anextrememutationalhotspotinnlpddependsontranscriptionalinductionofrpos
AT christinavasileiou anextrememutationalhotspotinnlpddependsontranscriptionalinductionofrpos
AT peteralind anextrememutationalhotspotinnlpddependsontranscriptionalinductionofrpos
AT paulbrainey anextrememutationalhotspotinnlpddependsontranscriptionalinductionofrpos
AT andrewdfarr extrememutationalhotspotinnlpddependsontranscriptionalinductionofrpos
AT christinavasileiou extrememutationalhotspotinnlpddependsontranscriptionalinductionofrpos
AT peteralind extrememutationalhotspotinnlpddependsontranscriptionalinductionofrpos
AT paulbrainey extrememutationalhotspotinnlpddependsontranscriptionalinductionofrpos