Praktikeres risikovurderinger: brugen af risikofaktorer i forebyggelsen af ungdomskriminalitet

Abstract Social work practitioners support vulnerable children and youth who have problems or are at risk of developing problems. Increasingly, politicians and authorities are emphasizing the role of early crime prevention in social work and the role of risk factors in crime prevention. However,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Morten Ejrnæs, Merete Monrad
Format: Article
Language:Danish
Published: De Nordiske Kriminalistforeninger 2020-06-01
Series:Nordisk Tidsskrift for Kriminalvidenskab
Subjects:
Online Access:https://tidsskrift.dk/NTfK/article/view/124868
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Social work practitioners support vulnerable children and youth who have problems or are at risk of developing problems. Increasingly, politicians and authorities are emphasizing the role of early crime prevention in social work and the role of risk factors in crime prevention. However, there has not been a focus on how practitioners actually estimate the risk of a young person being apprehended as a first-time offender. We study practitioners’ risk assessments through three vignettes. The vignettes have been constructed using register- and survey-based research on the association between youth crime and a diversity of risk factors. The vignettes are thereby constructed to allow a comparison between the risk assessments of practitioners and the actual risk as demonstrated by the data. The study utilizes a sample of 312 health visitors, teachers (including nursery school teachers) and social workers. The results indicate that practitioners grossly overestimate the risk of apprehension for first-time offences in all three vignettes. The average assessment of the risk is approximately 50 percentage points higher than the actual calculated risk. Furthermore, there is a large variation in the risk assessments given by different practitioners. Moreover, practitioners associate terms such as “high risk” with very different probabilities of crime.
ISSN:2446-3051