Comparison of Development and Antioxidative Ability in Fertilized Crossbred (Yorkshire × Landrace × Duroc) Oocytes Using Duroc and Landrace Sperm

Pig production through crossbreeding methods is a pillar of the swine industry; however, research on the fertilization ability of male pigs in crossbreeds is lacking. Therefore, this study investigated the effects of Duroc sperm (DS) and Landrace sperm (LS) on fertility in Yorkshire × Landrace × Dur...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hayoung Lee, Hyewon Kim, Jisoon An, Hee-Tae Cheong, Sang-Hee Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-12-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/14/24/3562
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850041192465563648
author Hayoung Lee
Hyewon Kim
Jisoon An
Hee-Tae Cheong
Sang-Hee Lee
author_facet Hayoung Lee
Hyewon Kim
Jisoon An
Hee-Tae Cheong
Sang-Hee Lee
author_sort Hayoung Lee
collection DOAJ
description Pig production through crossbreeding methods is a pillar of the swine industry; however, research on the fertilization ability of male pigs in crossbreeds is lacking. Therefore, this study investigated the effects of Duroc sperm (DS) and Landrace sperm (LS) on fertility in Yorkshire × Landrace × Duroc (YLD) oocytes. Sperm were collected from the Duroc and Landrace species, and sperm characteristics, viability, and acrosome reactions were analyzed using flow cytometry. Oocytes were collected from YLD ovaries, and the fertility of DS and LS was determined using in vitro fertilization (IVF). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and antioxidative abilities were analyzed using H<sub>2</sub>DCFDA and a Cell Tracker Red assay. Pluripotency (<i>OCT4</i>, <i>SOX2</i>, and <i>NANOG)</i>, antioxidative (<i>SOD1</i>, <i>SOD2</i>, <i>CAT</i>, and <i>GPx1</i>), apoptotic (<i>Bax</i> and <i>Bcl-2</i>), and cell cycle-related (<i>Cdc2</i> and <i>CCNB1</i>) genes were detected using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) in oocytes fertilized with sperm. The results showed no significant difference in viability or acrosome reaction between DS and LS. ROS levels were significantly lower in the LS group than in the DS group, whereas glutathione (GSH) levels in the embryo did not significantly differ between the DS and LS groups. The <i>OCT4</i>, <i>GPx1</i>, and <i>Cdc2</i> mRNA expression levels were significantly higher in the LS than DS groups. Blastocyst formation was significantly higher in the LS than DS groups. ROS levels were reduced, and blastocyte formation was increased in LS-obtained embryos. In conclusion, these results provide a fundamental understanding of using Landrace semen in the three-way crossbreeding of YLD pigs.
format Article
id doaj-art-962a8129c11d48369e4151d84d041d4b
institution DOAJ
issn 2076-2615
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Animals
spelling doaj-art-962a8129c11d48369e4151d84d041d4b2025-08-20T02:55:49ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152024-12-011424356210.3390/ani14243562Comparison of Development and Antioxidative Ability in Fertilized Crossbred (Yorkshire × Landrace × Duroc) Oocytes Using Duroc and Landrace SpermHayoung Lee0Hyewon Kim1Jisoon An2Hee-Tae Cheong3Sang-Hee Lee4College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of KoreaCollege of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of KoreaCollege of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of KoreaCollege of Veterinary Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of KoreaCollege of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of KoreaPig production through crossbreeding methods is a pillar of the swine industry; however, research on the fertilization ability of male pigs in crossbreeds is lacking. Therefore, this study investigated the effects of Duroc sperm (DS) and Landrace sperm (LS) on fertility in Yorkshire × Landrace × Duroc (YLD) oocytes. Sperm were collected from the Duroc and Landrace species, and sperm characteristics, viability, and acrosome reactions were analyzed using flow cytometry. Oocytes were collected from YLD ovaries, and the fertility of DS and LS was determined using in vitro fertilization (IVF). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and antioxidative abilities were analyzed using H<sub>2</sub>DCFDA and a Cell Tracker Red assay. Pluripotency (<i>OCT4</i>, <i>SOX2</i>, and <i>NANOG)</i>, antioxidative (<i>SOD1</i>, <i>SOD2</i>, <i>CAT</i>, and <i>GPx1</i>), apoptotic (<i>Bax</i> and <i>Bcl-2</i>), and cell cycle-related (<i>Cdc2</i> and <i>CCNB1</i>) genes were detected using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) in oocytes fertilized with sperm. The results showed no significant difference in viability or acrosome reaction between DS and LS. ROS levels were significantly lower in the LS group than in the DS group, whereas glutathione (GSH) levels in the embryo did not significantly differ between the DS and LS groups. The <i>OCT4</i>, <i>GPx1</i>, and <i>Cdc2</i> mRNA expression levels were significantly higher in the LS than DS groups. Blastocyst formation was significantly higher in the LS than DS groups. ROS levels were reduced, and blastocyte formation was increased in LS-obtained embryos. In conclusion, these results provide a fundamental understanding of using Landrace semen in the three-way crossbreeding of YLD pigs.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/14/24/3562Durocembryo developmentLandracesperm characteristics
spellingShingle Hayoung Lee
Hyewon Kim
Jisoon An
Hee-Tae Cheong
Sang-Hee Lee
Comparison of Development and Antioxidative Ability in Fertilized Crossbred (Yorkshire × Landrace × Duroc) Oocytes Using Duroc and Landrace Sperm
Animals
Duroc
embryo development
Landrace
sperm characteristics
title Comparison of Development and Antioxidative Ability in Fertilized Crossbred (Yorkshire × Landrace × Duroc) Oocytes Using Duroc and Landrace Sperm
title_full Comparison of Development and Antioxidative Ability in Fertilized Crossbred (Yorkshire × Landrace × Duroc) Oocytes Using Duroc and Landrace Sperm
title_fullStr Comparison of Development and Antioxidative Ability in Fertilized Crossbred (Yorkshire × Landrace × Duroc) Oocytes Using Duroc and Landrace Sperm
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Development and Antioxidative Ability in Fertilized Crossbred (Yorkshire × Landrace × Duroc) Oocytes Using Duroc and Landrace Sperm
title_short Comparison of Development and Antioxidative Ability in Fertilized Crossbred (Yorkshire × Landrace × Duroc) Oocytes Using Duroc and Landrace Sperm
title_sort comparison of development and antioxidative ability in fertilized crossbred yorkshire landrace duroc oocytes using duroc and landrace sperm
topic Duroc
embryo development
Landrace
sperm characteristics
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/14/24/3562
work_keys_str_mv AT hayounglee comparisonofdevelopmentandantioxidativeabilityinfertilizedcrossbredyorkshirelandracedurocoocytesusingdurocandlandracesperm
AT hyewonkim comparisonofdevelopmentandantioxidativeabilityinfertilizedcrossbredyorkshirelandracedurocoocytesusingdurocandlandracesperm
AT jisoonan comparisonofdevelopmentandantioxidativeabilityinfertilizedcrossbredyorkshirelandracedurocoocytesusingdurocandlandracesperm
AT heetaecheong comparisonofdevelopmentandantioxidativeabilityinfertilizedcrossbredyorkshirelandracedurocoocytesusingdurocandlandracesperm
AT sangheelee comparisonofdevelopmentandantioxidativeabilityinfertilizedcrossbredyorkshirelandracedurocoocytesusingdurocandlandracesperm