Physics, Philosophy, and the Nature of Reality

Both science and philosophy have been characterized as seeking to understand the nature of reality. They are sometimes even pitted against each other, suggesting that the success of science undermines the relevance of philosophy. But attending to the sort of understanding or explanation being sought...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tim Maudlin, Murat Yıldız
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Istanbul University Press 2024-06-01
Series:Felsefe Arkivi
Subjects:
Online Access:https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/04EDADC9510B4DD68564BAD46D25061D
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Both science and philosophy have been characterized as seeking to understand the nature of reality. They are sometimes even pitted against each other, suggesting that the success of science undermines the relevance of philosophy. But attending to the sort of understanding or explanation being sought offers a different picture: contemporary physics as practiced sometimes fails to provide a clear physical account of the world. This lies at the root of the dissatisfaction with standard quantum theory expressed by Einstein, Schrodinger, and John Bell. As an example, close consideration of Schrodinger’s famous cat example suggests that physicists often have missed his point. What a philosophical disposition can contribute is not alternative physics, but rather the sort of careful attention to argument needed to extract a physical picture from a mathematical formalism.
ISSN:2667-7644