Effects of Environment on the Size Evolution of Quiescent Galaxies: Comparing Galaxies in Clusters and in the Field at Two Rest-frame Wavelengths

We investigate the impact of environment on quiescent galaxy (QG) size evolution using the CLAUDS+HSC imaging covering 18.6 deg ^2 in five broad filters ( Ugriz ) and the effective radius of a single-Sérsic fit as a proxy for galaxy size. We estimate sizes in two rest-frame wavelengths—3000 Å (UV) a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Angelo George, Ivana Damjanov, Marcin Sawicki, Devin J. Williams, Lingjian Chen, Guillaume Desprez, Marianna Annunziatella, Stéphane Arnouts, Stephen Gwyn, Danilo Marchesini, Thibaud Moutard, Anna Sajina
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2025-01-01
Series:The Astrophysical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/addc6b
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849467279624896512
author Angelo George
Ivana Damjanov
Marcin Sawicki
Devin J. Williams
Lingjian Chen
Guillaume Desprez
Marianna Annunziatella
Stéphane Arnouts
Stephen Gwyn
Danilo Marchesini
Thibaud Moutard
Anna Sajina
author_facet Angelo George
Ivana Damjanov
Marcin Sawicki
Devin J. Williams
Lingjian Chen
Guillaume Desprez
Marianna Annunziatella
Stéphane Arnouts
Stephen Gwyn
Danilo Marchesini
Thibaud Moutard
Anna Sajina
author_sort Angelo George
collection DOAJ
description We investigate the impact of environment on quiescent galaxy (QG) size evolution using the CLAUDS+HSC imaging covering 18.6 deg ^2 in five broad filters ( Ugriz ) and the effective radius of a single-Sérsic fit as a proxy for galaxy size. We estimate sizes in two rest-frame wavelengths—3000 Å (UV) and 5000 Å (optical)—for ∼86,000 massive ( M _* ≤ 10 ^9.5 M _⊙ ) field QGs and for 1000 of their similarly massive counterparts from 47 clusters at 0.1 < z < 0.85. We fit the size–mass relation (SMR) for field and cluster QGs in five Δ z = 0.15 redshift bins and use the characteristic size of M _* = 5 × 10 ^10 M _⊙ QGs (SMR’s zero-point) to trace the change in galaxy size over cosmic time and in two types of environment. Sizes of QGs are larger in the rest-frame UV than in the rest-frame optical in both clusters and the field, and this difference is more prominent in the field sample. However, QGs in clusters are systematically smaller than the field QGs, and this difference is significantly more pronounced if measured in the rest-frame UV light. Modeling of the redshift evolution in the characteristic QG size as R _e ∝ (1 + z ) ^β shows that the cluster QGs ( β = −1.02 in UV and β = −1.00 in optical) grow in size as fast as the field QGs ( β = −0.95 in UV and −1.22 in optical). This fast growth of cluster QGs is consistent with size increase driven by the accretion of two subpopulations onto clusters: (a) field QGs that are larger than their quiescent counterparts in clusters, and (b) environmentally quenched galaxies (newcomers) that are larger than the rest of the quiescent population.
format Article
id doaj-art-95fc47451f8247cfbb3677e4d5fd868c
institution Kabale University
issn 1538-4357
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series The Astrophysical Journal
spelling doaj-art-95fc47451f8247cfbb3677e4d5fd868c2025-08-20T03:27:43ZengIOP PublishingThe Astrophysical Journal1538-43572025-01-0198714510.3847/1538-4357/addc6bEffects of Environment on the Size Evolution of Quiescent Galaxies: Comparing Galaxies in Clusters and in the Field at Two Rest-frame WavelengthsAngelo George0https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2742-7702Ivana Damjanov1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4797-5246Marcin Sawicki2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7712-7857Devin J. Williams3Lingjian Chen4Guillaume Desprez5https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8325-1742Marianna Annunziatella6https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8053-8040Stéphane Arnouts7https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8053-2512Stephen Gwyn8https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8221-8406Danilo Marchesini9https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9002-3502Thibaud Moutard10https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3305-9901Anna Sajina11https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1917-1200Institute for Computational Astrophysics and Department of Astronomy & Physics, Saint Mary’s University , 923 Robie Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 3C3, Canada ; angelogeorget@gmail.comInstitute for Computational Astrophysics and Department of Astronomy & Physics, Saint Mary’s University , 923 Robie Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 3C3, Canada ; angelogeorget@gmail.comInstitute for Computational Astrophysics and Department of Astronomy & Physics, Saint Mary’s University , 923 Robie Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 3C3, Canada ; angelogeorget@gmail.comInstitute for Computational Astrophysics and Department of Astronomy & Physics, Saint Mary’s University , 923 Robie Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 3C3, Canada ; angelogeorget@gmail.comInstitute for Computational Astrophysics and Department of Astronomy & Physics, Saint Mary’s University , 923 Robie Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 3C3, Canada ; angelogeorget@gmail.comInstitute for Computational Astrophysics and Department of Astronomy & Physics, Saint Mary’s University , 923 Robie Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 3C3, Canada ; angelogeorget@gmail.comCentro de Astrobiología (CSIC-INTA) , Ctra de Torrejón a Ajalvir, km 4, E-28850 Torrejón de Ardoz, Madrid, SpainAix-Marseille University , CNRS, CNES, LAM, Marseille, FranceNRC Herzberg Astronomy and Astrophysics , 5071 West Saanich Road, Victoria, British Columbia, V9E 2E7, CanadaDepartment of Physics & Astronomy, Tufts University School of Arts and Sciences , 574 Boston Avenue, Medford, MA 02155, USAEuropean Space Agency (ESA), European Space Astronomy Centre (ESAC) , Camino Bajo del Castillo s/n, 28692 Villanueva de laCañada, Madrid, SpainDepartment of Physics & Astronomy, Tufts University School of Arts and Sciences , 574 Boston Avenue, Medford, MA 02155, USAWe investigate the impact of environment on quiescent galaxy (QG) size evolution using the CLAUDS+HSC imaging covering 18.6 deg ^2 in five broad filters ( Ugriz ) and the effective radius of a single-Sérsic fit as a proxy for galaxy size. We estimate sizes in two rest-frame wavelengths—3000 Å (UV) and 5000 Å (optical)—for ∼86,000 massive ( M _* ≤ 10 ^9.5 M _⊙ ) field QGs and for 1000 of their similarly massive counterparts from 47 clusters at 0.1 < z < 0.85. We fit the size–mass relation (SMR) for field and cluster QGs in five Δ z = 0.15 redshift bins and use the characteristic size of M _* = 5 × 10 ^10 M _⊙ QGs (SMR’s zero-point) to trace the change in galaxy size over cosmic time and in two types of environment. Sizes of QGs are larger in the rest-frame UV than in the rest-frame optical in both clusters and the field, and this difference is more prominent in the field sample. However, QGs in clusters are systematically smaller than the field QGs, and this difference is significantly more pronounced if measured in the rest-frame UV light. Modeling of the redshift evolution in the characteristic QG size as R _e ∝ (1 + z ) ^β shows that the cluster QGs ( β = −1.02 in UV and β = −1.00 in optical) grow in size as fast as the field QGs ( β = −0.95 in UV and −1.22 in optical). This fast growth of cluster QGs is consistent with size increase driven by the accretion of two subpopulations onto clusters: (a) field QGs that are larger than their quiescent counterparts in clusters, and (b) environmentally quenched galaxies (newcomers) that are larger than the rest of the quiescent population.https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/addc6bGalaxy evolutionGalaxy clustersUltraviolet astronomyOptical astronomyGalaxy environments
spellingShingle Angelo George
Ivana Damjanov
Marcin Sawicki
Devin J. Williams
Lingjian Chen
Guillaume Desprez
Marianna Annunziatella
Stéphane Arnouts
Stephen Gwyn
Danilo Marchesini
Thibaud Moutard
Anna Sajina
Effects of Environment on the Size Evolution of Quiescent Galaxies: Comparing Galaxies in Clusters and in the Field at Two Rest-frame Wavelengths
The Astrophysical Journal
Galaxy evolution
Galaxy clusters
Ultraviolet astronomy
Optical astronomy
Galaxy environments
title Effects of Environment on the Size Evolution of Quiescent Galaxies: Comparing Galaxies in Clusters and in the Field at Two Rest-frame Wavelengths
title_full Effects of Environment on the Size Evolution of Quiescent Galaxies: Comparing Galaxies in Clusters and in the Field at Two Rest-frame Wavelengths
title_fullStr Effects of Environment on the Size Evolution of Quiescent Galaxies: Comparing Galaxies in Clusters and in the Field at Two Rest-frame Wavelengths
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Environment on the Size Evolution of Quiescent Galaxies: Comparing Galaxies in Clusters and in the Field at Two Rest-frame Wavelengths
title_short Effects of Environment on the Size Evolution of Quiescent Galaxies: Comparing Galaxies in Clusters and in the Field at Two Rest-frame Wavelengths
title_sort effects of environment on the size evolution of quiescent galaxies comparing galaxies in clusters and in the field at two rest frame wavelengths
topic Galaxy evolution
Galaxy clusters
Ultraviolet astronomy
Optical astronomy
Galaxy environments
url https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/addc6b
work_keys_str_mv AT angelogeorge effectsofenvironmentonthesizeevolutionofquiescentgalaxiescomparinggalaxiesinclustersandinthefieldattworestframewavelengths
AT ivanadamjanov effectsofenvironmentonthesizeevolutionofquiescentgalaxiescomparinggalaxiesinclustersandinthefieldattworestframewavelengths
AT marcinsawicki effectsofenvironmentonthesizeevolutionofquiescentgalaxiescomparinggalaxiesinclustersandinthefieldattworestframewavelengths
AT devinjwilliams effectsofenvironmentonthesizeevolutionofquiescentgalaxiescomparinggalaxiesinclustersandinthefieldattworestframewavelengths
AT lingjianchen effectsofenvironmentonthesizeevolutionofquiescentgalaxiescomparinggalaxiesinclustersandinthefieldattworestframewavelengths
AT guillaumedesprez effectsofenvironmentonthesizeevolutionofquiescentgalaxiescomparinggalaxiesinclustersandinthefieldattworestframewavelengths
AT mariannaannunziatella effectsofenvironmentonthesizeevolutionofquiescentgalaxiescomparinggalaxiesinclustersandinthefieldattworestframewavelengths
AT stephanearnouts effectsofenvironmentonthesizeevolutionofquiescentgalaxiescomparinggalaxiesinclustersandinthefieldattworestframewavelengths
AT stephengwyn effectsofenvironmentonthesizeevolutionofquiescentgalaxiescomparinggalaxiesinclustersandinthefieldattworestframewavelengths
AT danilomarchesini effectsofenvironmentonthesizeevolutionofquiescentgalaxiescomparinggalaxiesinclustersandinthefieldattworestframewavelengths
AT thibaudmoutard effectsofenvironmentonthesizeevolutionofquiescentgalaxiescomparinggalaxiesinclustersandinthefieldattworestframewavelengths
AT annasajina effectsofenvironmentonthesizeevolutionofquiescentgalaxiescomparinggalaxiesinclustersandinthefieldattworestframewavelengths