Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy Compared to Conventional Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Meta-Analysis
This meta-analysis review compares the primary and secondary outcomes of transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TPRK) to the conventional photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), in terms of efficacy, predictability, safety, and patient perspectives. A total of 1711 eyes with PRK (811 eyes) and TPRK...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2022-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Ophthalmology |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3022672 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | This meta-analysis review compares the primary and secondary outcomes of transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TPRK) to the conventional photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), in terms of efficacy, predictability, safety, and patient perspectives. A total of 1711 eyes with PRK (811 eyes) and TPRK (900 eyes) from 12 studies were included through bibliographic searches. The main outcomes were efficacy, predictability, and safety parameters, and the secondary outcomes included visual and patient-reported parameters. The effect measures were weighted mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CI) which were derived from the random-effects model of the meta-analysis to account for possible heterogeneity. TPRK procedure presents a comparable status in the main outcome and a very dominant significance in all the secondary outcomes in this meta-analysis. This study updates the evidence of the accuracy of TPRK procedure for surgical correction of all refractive errors and was deemed safer with less surgical time required and an early healing time. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2090-0058 |