Patient and Healthcare Professional Reflections on Consenting for Extra Bone Marrow Samples to a Biobank for Research—A Qualitative Study

Little is known about patient perspectives regarding consent for obtaining extra research-specific bone marrow (BM) samples during the diagnostic procedure for acute leukemia (AL). This study aimed to better understand patient experiences with consenting to provide these samples and identify potenti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stuart G. Nicholls, Erika Camilleri, Taryn Chesser, Gary Davis, Katya Godard, Grace Fox, Madeleine Jane Gordon, Krystina B. Lewis, Jocelyn Lepage, Oksana Motalo, Wendy Nuttall, Craig Peleshok, Caryn Y. Ito, Pierre J. A. Villeneuve, Mitchell Sabloff
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-03-01
Series:Current Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/32/3/179
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849342089356115968
author Stuart G. Nicholls
Erika Camilleri
Taryn Chesser
Gary Davis
Katya Godard
Grace Fox
Madeleine Jane Gordon
Krystina B. Lewis
Jocelyn Lepage
Oksana Motalo
Wendy Nuttall
Craig Peleshok
Caryn Y. Ito
Pierre J. A. Villeneuve
Mitchell Sabloff
author_facet Stuart G. Nicholls
Erika Camilleri
Taryn Chesser
Gary Davis
Katya Godard
Grace Fox
Madeleine Jane Gordon
Krystina B. Lewis
Jocelyn Lepage
Oksana Motalo
Wendy Nuttall
Craig Peleshok
Caryn Y. Ito
Pierre J. A. Villeneuve
Mitchell Sabloff
author_sort Stuart G. Nicholls
collection DOAJ
description Little is known about patient perspectives regarding consent for obtaining extra research-specific bone marrow (BM) samples during the diagnostic procedure for acute leukemia (AL). This study aimed to better understand patient experiences with consenting to provide these samples and identify potential areas for practice improvement. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients treated for AL, 4–6 years prior to the interviews, and healthcare professionals involved with obtaining patient consent and sample collection. A total of 17 patients (14 agreed to provide a sample and 3 did not have a sample in the biobank) and 5 healthcare professionals were interviewed, achieving data saturation. Patients supported increasing public knowledge about research and noted the importance of friends and family in providing emotional support and retaining information. Despite time pressure and anxiety, the decision to donate a research sample did not require much deliberation. Proximal factors informing decisions included impact on patient health and family and anticipated, procedure-associated pain; distal factors included altruism and trust in healthcare professionals. Key information included expected pain and management, the purpose of research samples, and sample security and privacy. Our findings suggest that BM research sample collection may be facilitated through optimizing the environment where information is provided and the type of information provided, including pain management options and the value of the samples for current and future research.
format Article
id doaj-art-95e3b57716f642ee839314f0d8ebf309
institution Kabale University
issn 1198-0052
1718-7729
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Current Oncology
spelling doaj-art-95e3b57716f642ee839314f0d8ebf3092025-08-20T03:43:30ZengMDPI AGCurrent Oncology1198-00521718-77292025-03-0132317910.3390/curroncol32030179Patient and Healthcare Professional Reflections on Consenting for Extra Bone Marrow Samples to a Biobank for Research—A Qualitative StudyStuart G. Nicholls0Erika Camilleri1Taryn Chesser2Gary Davis3Katya Godard4Grace Fox5Madeleine Jane Gordon6Krystina B. Lewis7Jocelyn Lepage8Oksana Motalo9Wendy Nuttall10Craig Peleshok11Caryn Y. Ito12Pierre J. A. Villeneuve13Mitchell Sabloff14Methodological and Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, CanadaMedical School, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, CanadaThe Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, CanadaIndependent Researcher, Ottawa, ON, CanadaOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, CanadaMethodological and Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, CanadaMedical School, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, CanadaSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, CanadaDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, CanadaDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, CanadaIndependent Researcher, Ottawa, ON, CanadaIndependent Researcher, Ottawa, ON, CanadaThe Sprott Centre for Stem Cell Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, CanadaDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, CanadaDivision of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, CanadaLittle is known about patient perspectives regarding consent for obtaining extra research-specific bone marrow (BM) samples during the diagnostic procedure for acute leukemia (AL). This study aimed to better understand patient experiences with consenting to provide these samples and identify potential areas for practice improvement. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients treated for AL, 4–6 years prior to the interviews, and healthcare professionals involved with obtaining patient consent and sample collection. A total of 17 patients (14 agreed to provide a sample and 3 did not have a sample in the biobank) and 5 healthcare professionals were interviewed, achieving data saturation. Patients supported increasing public knowledge about research and noted the importance of friends and family in providing emotional support and retaining information. Despite time pressure and anxiety, the decision to donate a research sample did not require much deliberation. Proximal factors informing decisions included impact on patient health and family and anticipated, procedure-associated pain; distal factors included altruism and trust in healthcare professionals. Key information included expected pain and management, the purpose of research samples, and sample security and privacy. Our findings suggest that BM research sample collection may be facilitated through optimizing the environment where information is provided and the type of information provided, including pain management options and the value of the samples for current and future research.https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/32/3/179bone marrowacute leukemiabiobankqualitativepatient experience
spellingShingle Stuart G. Nicholls
Erika Camilleri
Taryn Chesser
Gary Davis
Katya Godard
Grace Fox
Madeleine Jane Gordon
Krystina B. Lewis
Jocelyn Lepage
Oksana Motalo
Wendy Nuttall
Craig Peleshok
Caryn Y. Ito
Pierre J. A. Villeneuve
Mitchell Sabloff
Patient and Healthcare Professional Reflections on Consenting for Extra Bone Marrow Samples to a Biobank for Research—A Qualitative Study
Current Oncology
bone marrow
acute leukemia
biobank
qualitative
patient experience
title Patient and Healthcare Professional Reflections on Consenting for Extra Bone Marrow Samples to a Biobank for Research—A Qualitative Study
title_full Patient and Healthcare Professional Reflections on Consenting for Extra Bone Marrow Samples to a Biobank for Research—A Qualitative Study
title_fullStr Patient and Healthcare Professional Reflections on Consenting for Extra Bone Marrow Samples to a Biobank for Research—A Qualitative Study
title_full_unstemmed Patient and Healthcare Professional Reflections on Consenting for Extra Bone Marrow Samples to a Biobank for Research—A Qualitative Study
title_short Patient and Healthcare Professional Reflections on Consenting for Extra Bone Marrow Samples to a Biobank for Research—A Qualitative Study
title_sort patient and healthcare professional reflections on consenting for extra bone marrow samples to a biobank for research a qualitative study
topic bone marrow
acute leukemia
biobank
qualitative
patient experience
url https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/32/3/179
work_keys_str_mv AT stuartgnicholls patientandhealthcareprofessionalreflectionsonconsentingforextrabonemarrowsamplestoabiobankforresearchaqualitativestudy
AT erikacamilleri patientandhealthcareprofessionalreflectionsonconsentingforextrabonemarrowsamplestoabiobankforresearchaqualitativestudy
AT tarynchesser patientandhealthcareprofessionalreflectionsonconsentingforextrabonemarrowsamplestoabiobankforresearchaqualitativestudy
AT garydavis patientandhealthcareprofessionalreflectionsonconsentingforextrabonemarrowsamplestoabiobankforresearchaqualitativestudy
AT katyagodard patientandhealthcareprofessionalreflectionsonconsentingforextrabonemarrowsamplestoabiobankforresearchaqualitativestudy
AT gracefox patientandhealthcareprofessionalreflectionsonconsentingforextrabonemarrowsamplestoabiobankforresearchaqualitativestudy
AT madeleinejanegordon patientandhealthcareprofessionalreflectionsonconsentingforextrabonemarrowsamplestoabiobankforresearchaqualitativestudy
AT krystinablewis patientandhealthcareprofessionalreflectionsonconsentingforextrabonemarrowsamplestoabiobankforresearchaqualitativestudy
AT jocelynlepage patientandhealthcareprofessionalreflectionsonconsentingforextrabonemarrowsamplestoabiobankforresearchaqualitativestudy
AT oksanamotalo patientandhealthcareprofessionalreflectionsonconsentingforextrabonemarrowsamplestoabiobankforresearchaqualitativestudy
AT wendynuttall patientandhealthcareprofessionalreflectionsonconsentingforextrabonemarrowsamplestoabiobankforresearchaqualitativestudy
AT craigpeleshok patientandhealthcareprofessionalreflectionsonconsentingforextrabonemarrowsamplestoabiobankforresearchaqualitativestudy
AT carynyito patientandhealthcareprofessionalreflectionsonconsentingforextrabonemarrowsamplestoabiobankforresearchaqualitativestudy
AT pierrejavilleneuve patientandhealthcareprofessionalreflectionsonconsentingforextrabonemarrowsamplestoabiobankforresearchaqualitativestudy
AT mitchellsabloff patientandhealthcareprofessionalreflectionsonconsentingforextrabonemarrowsamplestoabiobankforresearchaqualitativestudy