PEA (PISUM L.) ACCESSIONS DIFFER IN THE STAGE OF FLOWER DEVELOPMENT BEST FOR POLLINATION
In order to optimize artificial pollination in various pea species and subspecies, the efficiency of artificial pollination was analyzed in eight accessions belonging to Pisum fulvum, Pisum sativum ssp. elatius (wild), P. abyssinicum, and P. sativum ssp. sativum (cultivated). Mean numbers of seeds p...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics, The Vavilov Society of Geneticists and Breeders
2015-01-01
|
| Series: | Вавиловский журнал генетики и селекции |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://vavilov.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/272 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832575315292979200 |
|---|---|
| author | O. E. Kosterin V. S. Bogdanova |
| author_facet | O. E. Kosterin V. S. Bogdanova |
| author_sort | O. E. Kosterin |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In order to optimize artificial pollination in various pea species and subspecies, the efficiency of artificial pollination was analyzed in eight accessions belonging to Pisum fulvum, Pisum sativum ssp. elatius (wild), P. abyssinicum, and P. sativum ssp. sativum (cultivated). Mean numbers of seeds per flower pollinated with its own pollen were determined in three pollination methods: 1) immediately after bud castration before anther dehiscence, 2) after the dehiscence of a flower castrated at the same stage (delayed pollination), and 3) double pollination as in methods (1) and (2). These methods did not differ in efficiency in cultivated accessions. In wild ones, method (2) was similar to (1) or better, whereas method (3) was comparable in efficiency with method (2). Method (2) (delayed pollination) was 12 times as efficient as method (1) in accession 721 (Pisum sativum subsp. elatius), possessing very large flowers. Delayed pollination is recommended for wild pea varieties. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-954abad8fd044ff29dea4d219b02280f |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2500-3259 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2015-01-01 |
| publisher | Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics, The Vavilov Society of Geneticists and Breeders |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Вавиловский журнал генетики и селекции |
| spelling | doaj-art-954abad8fd044ff29dea4d219b02280f2025-02-01T09:58:01ZengSiberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics, The Vavilov Society of Geneticists and BreedersВавиловский журнал генетики и селекции2500-32592015-01-01183478485256PEA (PISUM L.) ACCESSIONS DIFFER IN THE STAGE OF FLOWER DEVELOPMENT BEST FOR POLLINATIONO. E. Kosterin0V. S. Bogdanova1Institute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk, RussiaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk, RussiaIn order to optimize artificial pollination in various pea species and subspecies, the efficiency of artificial pollination was analyzed in eight accessions belonging to Pisum fulvum, Pisum sativum ssp. elatius (wild), P. abyssinicum, and P. sativum ssp. sativum (cultivated). Mean numbers of seeds per flower pollinated with its own pollen were determined in three pollination methods: 1) immediately after bud castration before anther dehiscence, 2) after the dehiscence of a flower castrated at the same stage (delayed pollination), and 3) double pollination as in methods (1) and (2). These methods did not differ in efficiency in cultivated accessions. In wild ones, method (2) was similar to (1) or better, whereas method (3) was comparable in efficiency with method (2). Method (2) (delayed pollination) was 12 times as efficient as method (1) in accession 721 (Pisum sativum subsp. elatius), possessing very large flowers. Delayed pollination is recommended for wild pea varieties.https://vavilov.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/272wild peapisum l.artificial pollinationself-pollination |
| spellingShingle | O. E. Kosterin V. S. Bogdanova PEA (PISUM L.) ACCESSIONS DIFFER IN THE STAGE OF FLOWER DEVELOPMENT BEST FOR POLLINATION Вавиловский журнал генетики и селекции wild pea pisum l. artificial pollination self-pollination |
| title | PEA (PISUM L.) ACCESSIONS DIFFER IN THE STAGE OF FLOWER DEVELOPMENT BEST FOR POLLINATION |
| title_full | PEA (PISUM L.) ACCESSIONS DIFFER IN THE STAGE OF FLOWER DEVELOPMENT BEST FOR POLLINATION |
| title_fullStr | PEA (PISUM L.) ACCESSIONS DIFFER IN THE STAGE OF FLOWER DEVELOPMENT BEST FOR POLLINATION |
| title_full_unstemmed | PEA (PISUM L.) ACCESSIONS DIFFER IN THE STAGE OF FLOWER DEVELOPMENT BEST FOR POLLINATION |
| title_short | PEA (PISUM L.) ACCESSIONS DIFFER IN THE STAGE OF FLOWER DEVELOPMENT BEST FOR POLLINATION |
| title_sort | pea pisum l accessions differ in the stage of flower development best for pollination |
| topic | wild pea pisum l. artificial pollination self-pollination |
| url | https://vavilov.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/272 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT oekosterin peapisumlaccessionsdifferinthestageofflowerdevelopmentbestforpollination AT vsbogdanova peapisumlaccessionsdifferinthestageofflowerdevelopmentbestforpollination |