PEA (PISUM L.) ACCESSIONS DIFFER IN THE STAGE OF FLOWER DEVELOPMENT BEST FOR POLLINATION

In order to optimize artificial pollination in various pea species and subspecies, the efficiency of artificial pollination was analyzed in eight accessions belonging to Pisum fulvum, Pisum sativum ssp. elatius (wild), P. abyssinicum, and P. sativum ssp. sativum (cultivated). Mean numbers of seeds p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: O. E. Kosterin, V. S. Bogdanova
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics, The Vavilov Society of Geneticists and Breeders 2015-01-01
Series:Вавиловский журнал генетики и селекции
Subjects:
Online Access:https://vavilov.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/272
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In order to optimize artificial pollination in various pea species and subspecies, the efficiency of artificial pollination was analyzed in eight accessions belonging to Pisum fulvum, Pisum sativum ssp. elatius (wild), P. abyssinicum, and P. sativum ssp. sativum (cultivated). Mean numbers of seeds per flower pollinated with its own pollen were determined in three pollination methods: 1) immediately after bud castration before anther dehiscence, 2) after the dehiscence of a flower castrated at the same stage (delayed pollination), and 3) double pollination as in methods (1) and (2). These methods did not differ in efficiency in cultivated accessions. In wild ones, method (2) was similar to (1) or better, whereas method (3) was comparable in efficiency with method (2). Method (2) (delayed pollination) was 12 times as efficient as method (1) in accession 721 (Pisum sativum subsp. elatius), possessing very large flowers. Delayed pollination is recommended for wild pea varieties.
ISSN:2500-3259