The Marginalisation of Racial Discourses in Australian Legal Education
Educational institutions generally are not often clear as to why they internationalize the education they provide to their students. Three different ways for law schools to develop and apply internationalization strategies are explored in this paper. This assessment then provides the context for the...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Bond University
2006-01-01
|
| Series: | Legal Education Review |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6187 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849686738521292800 |
|---|---|
| author | Nickolas John James |
| author_facet | Nickolas John James |
| author_sort | Nickolas John James |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Educational institutions generally are not often clear as to why they internationalize the education they provide to their students. Three different ways for law schools to develop and apply internationalization strategies are explored in this paper. This assessment then provides the context for the relevant skills, attitudes and knowledge areas that can be embedded in a curriculum. The paper also describes the Griffith Law School’s recent curricular changes by looking closely at the particular vehicles the School used to embed and integrate its internationalization strategies into the curriculum. The possibilities and opportunities for law schools to internationalize their existing curriculum is immense, and the frameworks and discussions of them in this paper should provide other law schools with a range of options to consider in reviewing their own curriculum. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-9541ab6ae212475ebc5b94d456fe25f4 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 1033-2839 1839-3713 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2006-01-01 |
| publisher | Bond University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Legal Education Review |
| spelling | doaj-art-9541ab6ae212475ebc5b94d456fe25f42025-08-20T03:22:35ZengBond UniversityLegal Education Review1033-28391839-37132006-01-0116110.53300/001c.6187The Marginalisation of Racial Discourses in Australian Legal EducationNickolas John JamesEducational institutions generally are not often clear as to why they internationalize the education they provide to their students. Three different ways for law schools to develop and apply internationalization strategies are explored in this paper. This assessment then provides the context for the relevant skills, attitudes and knowledge areas that can be embedded in a curriculum. The paper also describes the Griffith Law School’s recent curricular changes by looking closely at the particular vehicles the School used to embed and integrate its internationalization strategies into the curriculum. The possibilities and opportunities for law schools to internationalize their existing curriculum is immense, and the frameworks and discussions of them in this paper should provide other law schools with a range of options to consider in reviewing their own curriculum.https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6187 |
| spellingShingle | Nickolas John James The Marginalisation of Racial Discourses in Australian Legal Education Legal Education Review |
| title | The Marginalisation of Racial Discourses in Australian Legal Education |
| title_full | The Marginalisation of Racial Discourses in Australian Legal Education |
| title_fullStr | The Marginalisation of Racial Discourses in Australian Legal Education |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Marginalisation of Racial Discourses in Australian Legal Education |
| title_short | The Marginalisation of Racial Discourses in Australian Legal Education |
| title_sort | marginalisation of racial discourses in australian legal education |
| url | https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6187 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nickolasjohnjames themarginalisationofracialdiscoursesinaustralianlegaleducation AT nickolasjohnjames marginalisationofracialdiscoursesinaustralianlegaleducation |