Comparison of Brachial Compression Versus Ulnar Compression on Radial Artery Diameter: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Conclusion: Ulnar compression and brachial compression maneuvers demonstrated effectiveness in inducing radial artery dilation for a limited duration. These maneuvers may reduce the occurrence of access failure during radial artery cannulation. No significant differences were observed between the tw...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fatemeh Bahrami, Shayan Mirshafiee, Pejman Mansouri, Mohammadreza Eftekhari, Mohammad Vahidi, Fateme Baharvand, Ehsan Moradi Farsani, Hamed Vahidi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-01-01
Series:International Journal of Vascular Medicine
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/9965794
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850130140802056192
author Fatemeh Bahrami
Shayan Mirshafiee
Pejman Mansouri
Mohammadreza Eftekhari
Mohammad Vahidi
Fateme Baharvand
Ehsan Moradi Farsani
Hamed Vahidi
author_facet Fatemeh Bahrami
Shayan Mirshafiee
Pejman Mansouri
Mohammadreza Eftekhari
Mohammad Vahidi
Fateme Baharvand
Ehsan Moradi Farsani
Hamed Vahidi
author_sort Fatemeh Bahrami
collection DOAJ
description Conclusion: Ulnar compression and brachial compression maneuvers demonstrated effectiveness in inducing radial artery dilation for a limited duration. These maneuvers may reduce the occurrence of access failure during radial artery cannulation. No significant differences were observed between the two maneuvers, indicating that they can be used interchangeably based on clinician preference. So, because the ulnar compression is simpler and more feasible for the patients, it can be considered instead of brachial compression.
format Article
id doaj-art-953d8b331c8a40008bdd82702a4f01e7
institution OA Journals
issn 2090-2832
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Vascular Medicine
spelling doaj-art-953d8b331c8a40008bdd82702a4f01e72025-08-20T02:32:46ZengWileyInternational Journal of Vascular Medicine2090-28322024-01-01202410.1155/2024/9965794Comparison of Brachial Compression Versus Ulnar Compression on Radial Artery Diameter: A Randomized Controlled TrialFatemeh Bahrami0Shayan Mirshafiee1Pejman Mansouri2Mohammadreza Eftekhari3Mohammad Vahidi4Fateme Baharvand5Ehsan Moradi Farsani6Hamed Vahidi7Department of CardiologyDepartment of CardiologyTehran Heart CenterDepartment of CardiologyDepartment of RadiologyCardiovascular Diseases Research CenterDepartment of CardiologyDepartment of CardiologyConclusion: Ulnar compression and brachial compression maneuvers demonstrated effectiveness in inducing radial artery dilation for a limited duration. These maneuvers may reduce the occurrence of access failure during radial artery cannulation. No significant differences were observed between the two maneuvers, indicating that they can be used interchangeably based on clinician preference. So, because the ulnar compression is simpler and more feasible for the patients, it can be considered instead of brachial compression.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/9965794
spellingShingle Fatemeh Bahrami
Shayan Mirshafiee
Pejman Mansouri
Mohammadreza Eftekhari
Mohammad Vahidi
Fateme Baharvand
Ehsan Moradi Farsani
Hamed Vahidi
Comparison of Brachial Compression Versus Ulnar Compression on Radial Artery Diameter: A Randomized Controlled Trial
International Journal of Vascular Medicine
title Comparison of Brachial Compression Versus Ulnar Compression on Radial Artery Diameter: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Comparison of Brachial Compression Versus Ulnar Compression on Radial Artery Diameter: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Comparison of Brachial Compression Versus Ulnar Compression on Radial Artery Diameter: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Brachial Compression Versus Ulnar Compression on Radial Artery Diameter: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Comparison of Brachial Compression Versus Ulnar Compression on Radial Artery Diameter: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort comparison of brachial compression versus ulnar compression on radial artery diameter a randomized controlled trial
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/9965794
work_keys_str_mv AT fatemehbahrami comparisonofbrachialcompressionversusulnarcompressiononradialarterydiameterarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shayanmirshafiee comparisonofbrachialcompressionversusulnarcompressiononradialarterydiameterarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pejmanmansouri comparisonofbrachialcompressionversusulnarcompressiononradialarterydiameterarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mohammadrezaeftekhari comparisonofbrachialcompressionversusulnarcompressiononradialarterydiameterarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mohammadvahidi comparisonofbrachialcompressionversusulnarcompressiononradialarterydiameterarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fatemebaharvand comparisonofbrachialcompressionversusulnarcompressiononradialarterydiameterarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ehsanmoradifarsani comparisonofbrachialcompressionversusulnarcompressiononradialarterydiameterarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hamedvahidi comparisonofbrachialcompressionversusulnarcompressiononradialarterydiameterarandomizedcontrolledtrial