REASSESSING ABSOLUTE JURISDICTION: LEGAL ACCOUNTABILITY AND INSTITUTIONAL IMMUNITY OF INDONESIA’S CONSTITUTIONAL COURT

As the guardian of the constitution, Indonesia’s Constitutional Court (MK) exercises absolute judicial authority, with decisions that are final and binding. However, in practice, the Court also performs institutional administrative actions, such as appointing officials and managing internal structur...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abdul Rohman, Neni Ruhaeni, Efik Yusdiansyah, Nurul Chotidjah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UPT Publikasi dan Pengelolaan Jurnal Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari Banjarmasin 2025-07-01
Series:Al-Adl
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.uniska-bjm.ac.id/index.php/aldli/article/view/19088
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:As the guardian of the constitution, Indonesia’s Constitutional Court (MK) exercises absolute judicial authority, with decisions that are final and binding. However, in practice, the Court also performs institutional administrative actions, such as appointing officials and managing internal structures. This study examines the jurisdictional boundary between the Court’s judicial and administrative functions, questioning whether the latter can be subject to administrative judicial review before the Administrative Court (PTUN). Using a normative legal approach supported by a case study (Decision No. 604/G/2023/PTUN.JKT) and comparative analysis from Germany, India, and South Korea, the study finds that constitutional immunity does not extend absolutely to administrative actions of judicial bodies. Administrative decisions that are concrete, individual, and have legal consequences must adhere to the principles of administrative law and good governance (AAUPB). The findings highlight the importance of a functional distinction between judicial and administrative authority and emphasize the need for legal oversight to ensure accountability of constitutional bodies in a democratic rule of law state.
ISSN:1979-4940
2477-0124