Fulgence de Ruspe, l’aristocratie romano-africaine et le pouvoir vandale sous les règnes de Gunthamund et de Thrasamund : collaboration ou résistance ?

The hagiographic biography of Fulgentius of Ruspe shows two forms of Nicene resistance to Vandal Arianism at the end of the fifth and beginning of the sixth century: the creation of monasteries to compensate the persecution of the Nicene Church and the religious controversies. Some members of the Af...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bruno Pottier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Anthropologie et Histoire des Mondes Antiques 2025-02-01
Series:Cahiers Mondes Anciens
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/mondesanciens/5382
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850026810242236416
author Bruno Pottier
author_facet Bruno Pottier
author_sort Bruno Pottier
collection DOAJ
description The hagiographic biography of Fulgentius of Ruspe shows two forms of Nicene resistance to Vandal Arianism at the end of the fifth and beginning of the sixth century: the creation of monasteries to compensate the persecution of the Nicene Church and the religious controversies. Some members of the African elites could compensate the compromissions engendered by participation in the Vandal administration by financing new monasteries and creating links with charismatic monks such as Fulgentius. In fact, the Vandal kings seldom persecuted the Nicene monasteries as if they granted them a necessary space of freedom. The debate organised by Thrasamund between 517 and 519 in Carthage with Fulgentius denoted the will of this king to give the African elite a new model of behaviour, combining mastery of classical culture and theological knowledge. Some of Fulgentius’ letters show that this policy was successful. Theology was integrated into the literary otium, especially in the dinner parties. The idea of the good acceptance by African elites of a religiously neutral secular space promoted by Vandal kings, often based only on the study of poems from the Anthologia Latina, should therefore be questioned. However, Fulgentius, who has always showed his loyalty, paradoxically contributed by his actions to make the Vandal regime more acceptable to the Nicene elites, since he was a kind of objective ally of their kings.
format Article
id doaj-art-94de38473ee74defb85ecffeeb0488ca
institution DOAJ
issn 2107-0199
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Anthropologie et Histoire des Mondes Antiques
record_format Article
series Cahiers Mondes Anciens
spelling doaj-art-94de38473ee74defb85ecffeeb0488ca2025-08-20T03:00:25ZengAnthropologie et Histoire des Mondes AntiquesCahiers Mondes Anciens2107-01992025-02-011910.4000/13b4uFulgence de Ruspe, l’aristocratie romano-africaine et le pouvoir vandale sous les règnes de Gunthamund et de Thrasamund : collaboration ou résistance ?Bruno PottierThe hagiographic biography of Fulgentius of Ruspe shows two forms of Nicene resistance to Vandal Arianism at the end of the fifth and beginning of the sixth century: the creation of monasteries to compensate the persecution of the Nicene Church and the religious controversies. Some members of the African elites could compensate the compromissions engendered by participation in the Vandal administration by financing new monasteries and creating links with charismatic monks such as Fulgentius. In fact, the Vandal kings seldom persecuted the Nicene monasteries as if they granted them a necessary space of freedom. The debate organised by Thrasamund between 517 and 519 in Carthage with Fulgentius denoted the will of this king to give the African elite a new model of behaviour, combining mastery of classical culture and theological knowledge. Some of Fulgentius’ letters show that this policy was successful. Theology was integrated into the literary otium, especially in the dinner parties. The idea of the good acceptance by African elites of a religiously neutral secular space promoted by Vandal kings, often based only on the study of poems from the Anthologia Latina, should therefore be questioned. However, Fulgentius, who has always showed his loyalty, paradoxically contributed by his actions to make the Vandal regime more acceptable to the Nicene elites, since he was a kind of objective ally of their kings.https://journals.openedition.org/mondesanciens/5382arianismFulgentius of RuspeVandal Kingdomreligious controversiemonasterie
spellingShingle Bruno Pottier
Fulgence de Ruspe, l’aristocratie romano-africaine et le pouvoir vandale sous les règnes de Gunthamund et de Thrasamund : collaboration ou résistance ?
Cahiers Mondes Anciens
arianism
Fulgentius of Ruspe
Vandal Kingdom
religious controversie
monasterie
title Fulgence de Ruspe, l’aristocratie romano-africaine et le pouvoir vandale sous les règnes de Gunthamund et de Thrasamund : collaboration ou résistance ?
title_full Fulgence de Ruspe, l’aristocratie romano-africaine et le pouvoir vandale sous les règnes de Gunthamund et de Thrasamund : collaboration ou résistance ?
title_fullStr Fulgence de Ruspe, l’aristocratie romano-africaine et le pouvoir vandale sous les règnes de Gunthamund et de Thrasamund : collaboration ou résistance ?
title_full_unstemmed Fulgence de Ruspe, l’aristocratie romano-africaine et le pouvoir vandale sous les règnes de Gunthamund et de Thrasamund : collaboration ou résistance ?
title_short Fulgence de Ruspe, l’aristocratie romano-africaine et le pouvoir vandale sous les règnes de Gunthamund et de Thrasamund : collaboration ou résistance ?
title_sort fulgence de ruspe l aristocratie romano africaine et le pouvoir vandale sous les regnes de gunthamund et de thrasamund collaboration ou resistance
topic arianism
Fulgentius of Ruspe
Vandal Kingdom
religious controversie
monasterie
url https://journals.openedition.org/mondesanciens/5382
work_keys_str_mv AT brunopottier fulgencederuspelaristocratieromanoafricaineetlepouvoirvandalesouslesregnesdegunthamundetdethrasamundcollaborationouresistance