Influence of mechanical stress on biomass allocation in three species (Pachira aquatica Aubl., Sextonia rubra (Mez) van der Werff and Simarouba amara Aubl.) with contrasting posture control mechanisms

Abstract Key message The posture control in Pachira aquatica, Sextonia rubra and Simarouba amara is achieved through contrasted mechanisms involving tensile stress in wood only, bark only or both. This study evidenced that the restoration of verticality does not imply an overall cost for trees but m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Barbara Ghislain, Sabrina Coste, Grégory Faure, Jocelyn Cazal, Jonathan Prunier, Bruno Clair
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:Annals of Forest Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13595-025-01273-y
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832571183626715136
author Barbara Ghislain
Sabrina Coste
Grégory Faure
Jocelyn Cazal
Jonathan Prunier
Bruno Clair
author_facet Barbara Ghislain
Sabrina Coste
Grégory Faure
Jocelyn Cazal
Jonathan Prunier
Bruno Clair
author_sort Barbara Ghislain
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Key message The posture control in Pachira aquatica, Sextonia rubra and Simarouba amara is achieved through contrasted mechanisms involving tensile stress in wood only, bark only or both. This study evidenced that the restoration of verticality does not imply an overall cost for trees but modifies growth kinetics and biomass allocation to organs and tissues, improving the posture control of the trees in the three species. Context All trees need a motor system to correct their position through the generation of asymmetric tensile stress around the stem, leading to active bending. In angiosperms, depending on the species, tensile stress is generated either in wood (tension wood), in bark or in both. Aims Here, we investigated how gravitropic stimuli (tilted stems without any movement) may affect growth and biomass allocation and whether this process depends on the posture control mechanism of the species. Methods Tree growth kinetics, final biomass allocation and wood and bark proportion, localisation and density were measured on young tilted plants and straight plants as controls. Pachira aquatica, Sextonia rubra and Simarouba amara were selected according to the location of their their motor system within bark only, wood only or both wood and bark, respectively. Results In response to tilting, trees from the three species increased their diameter and decreased their slenderness, but the total biomass (including stem and roots) was not different from that in the control trees, suggesting that reaction to artificial tilting does not imply a specific cost for the plant. However, the species exhibited strong differences in growth kinetics, in the amount and organisation of the tissues or in biomass allocation to different organs (root vs shoot, wood vs bark), adapted to the specificity of the posture control mechanisms and improving their motor function. Conclusion Whatever the posture control mechanism, uprighting does not modify the total biomass invested. However, allocation of biomass to different organs is strongly modified to obtain an efficient control of the posture.
format Article
id doaj-art-94cf3b588ec74e039fadbf05b7901a4a
institution Kabale University
issn 1297-966X
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Annals of Forest Science
spelling doaj-art-94cf3b588ec74e039fadbf05b7901a4a2025-02-02T12:48:34ZengBMCAnnals of Forest Science1297-966X2025-01-0182111110.1186/s13595-025-01273-yInfluence of mechanical stress on biomass allocation in three species (Pachira aquatica Aubl., Sextonia rubra (Mez) van der Werff and Simarouba amara Aubl.) with contrasting posture control mechanismsBarbara Ghislain0Sabrina Coste1Grégory Faure2Jocelyn Cazal3Jonathan Prunier4Bruno Clair5CNRS, UMR EcoFoG, AgroParisTech, Cirad, INRAE, Univ. Antilles, Univ. GuyaneUniv. Guyane, UMR EcoFoG, AgroParisTech, Cirad, CNRS, INRAE, Univ. AntillesCNRS, UMR EcoFoG, AgroParisTech, Cirad, INRAE, Univ. Antilles, Univ. GuyaneINRAE, UMR EcoFoG, AgroParisTech, Cirad, CNRS, Univ. Antilles, Univ. GuyaneCNRS, UMR EcoFoG, AgroParisTech, Cirad, INRAE, Univ. Antilles, Univ. GuyaneCNRS, UMR EcoFoG, AgroParisTech, Cirad, INRAE, Univ. Antilles, Univ. GuyaneAbstract Key message The posture control in Pachira aquatica, Sextonia rubra and Simarouba amara is achieved through contrasted mechanisms involving tensile stress in wood only, bark only or both. This study evidenced that the restoration of verticality does not imply an overall cost for trees but modifies growth kinetics and biomass allocation to organs and tissues, improving the posture control of the trees in the three species. Context All trees need a motor system to correct their position through the generation of asymmetric tensile stress around the stem, leading to active bending. In angiosperms, depending on the species, tensile stress is generated either in wood (tension wood), in bark or in both. Aims Here, we investigated how gravitropic stimuli (tilted stems without any movement) may affect growth and biomass allocation and whether this process depends on the posture control mechanism of the species. Methods Tree growth kinetics, final biomass allocation and wood and bark proportion, localisation and density were measured on young tilted plants and straight plants as controls. Pachira aquatica, Sextonia rubra and Simarouba amara were selected according to the location of their their motor system within bark only, wood only or both wood and bark, respectively. Results In response to tilting, trees from the three species increased their diameter and decreased their slenderness, but the total biomass (including stem and roots) was not different from that in the control trees, suggesting that reaction to artificial tilting does not imply a specific cost for the plant. However, the species exhibited strong differences in growth kinetics, in the amount and organisation of the tissues or in biomass allocation to different organs (root vs shoot, wood vs bark), adapted to the specificity of the posture control mechanisms and improving their motor function. Conclusion Whatever the posture control mechanism, uprighting does not modify the total biomass invested. However, allocation of biomass to different organs is strongly modified to obtain an efficient control of the posture.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13595-025-01273-yTreeBiomass allocationPartitioningTension woodBarkGrowth kinetics
spellingShingle Barbara Ghislain
Sabrina Coste
Grégory Faure
Jocelyn Cazal
Jonathan Prunier
Bruno Clair
Influence of mechanical stress on biomass allocation in three species (Pachira aquatica Aubl., Sextonia rubra (Mez) van der Werff and Simarouba amara Aubl.) with contrasting posture control mechanisms
Annals of Forest Science
Tree
Biomass allocation
Partitioning
Tension wood
Bark
Growth kinetics
title Influence of mechanical stress on biomass allocation in three species (Pachira aquatica Aubl., Sextonia rubra (Mez) van der Werff and Simarouba amara Aubl.) with contrasting posture control mechanisms
title_full Influence of mechanical stress on biomass allocation in three species (Pachira aquatica Aubl., Sextonia rubra (Mez) van der Werff and Simarouba amara Aubl.) with contrasting posture control mechanisms
title_fullStr Influence of mechanical stress on biomass allocation in three species (Pachira aquatica Aubl., Sextonia rubra (Mez) van der Werff and Simarouba amara Aubl.) with contrasting posture control mechanisms
title_full_unstemmed Influence of mechanical stress on biomass allocation in three species (Pachira aquatica Aubl., Sextonia rubra (Mez) van der Werff and Simarouba amara Aubl.) with contrasting posture control mechanisms
title_short Influence of mechanical stress on biomass allocation in three species (Pachira aquatica Aubl., Sextonia rubra (Mez) van der Werff and Simarouba amara Aubl.) with contrasting posture control mechanisms
title_sort influence of mechanical stress on biomass allocation in three species pachira aquatica aubl sextonia rubra mez van der werff and simarouba amara aubl with contrasting posture control mechanisms
topic Tree
Biomass allocation
Partitioning
Tension wood
Bark
Growth kinetics
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13595-025-01273-y
work_keys_str_mv AT barbaraghislain influenceofmechanicalstressonbiomassallocationinthreespeciespachiraaquaticaaublsextoniarubramezvanderwerffandsimaroubaamaraaublwithcontrastingposturecontrolmechanisms
AT sabrinacoste influenceofmechanicalstressonbiomassallocationinthreespeciespachiraaquaticaaublsextoniarubramezvanderwerffandsimaroubaamaraaublwithcontrastingposturecontrolmechanisms
AT gregoryfaure influenceofmechanicalstressonbiomassallocationinthreespeciespachiraaquaticaaublsextoniarubramezvanderwerffandsimaroubaamaraaublwithcontrastingposturecontrolmechanisms
AT jocelyncazal influenceofmechanicalstressonbiomassallocationinthreespeciespachiraaquaticaaublsextoniarubramezvanderwerffandsimaroubaamaraaublwithcontrastingposturecontrolmechanisms
AT jonathanprunier influenceofmechanicalstressonbiomassallocationinthreespeciespachiraaquaticaaublsextoniarubramezvanderwerffandsimaroubaamaraaublwithcontrastingposturecontrolmechanisms
AT brunoclair influenceofmechanicalstressonbiomassallocationinthreespeciespachiraaquaticaaublsextoniarubramezvanderwerffandsimaroubaamaraaublwithcontrastingposturecontrolmechanisms