Is Conventional Knee Radiograph Reliable Enough to Assess the Anatomical Knee Alignment and Total Knee Prosthesis Position in Indian Population?

Background: The success and survivorship of primary total knee replacement mainly depend on the postoperative alignment and implant position. Long-leg radiograph (LLR) is considered gold standard in assessing knee alignment postoperatively. Studies have reported that bowing of the femoral shaft in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Suryamanikanta Balabadra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2022-01-01
Series:Journal of Orthopedics, Traumatology and Rehabilitation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/jotr/fulltext/2022/14010/is_conventional_knee_radiograph_reliable_enough_to.9.aspx
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850285249388347392
author Suryamanikanta Balabadra
author_facet Suryamanikanta Balabadra
author_sort Suryamanikanta Balabadra
collection DOAJ
description Background: The success and survivorship of primary total knee replacement mainly depend on the postoperative alignment and implant position. Long-leg radiograph (LLR) is considered gold standard in assessing knee alignment postoperatively. Studies have reported that bowing of the femoral shaft in the coronal plane is prevalent in Asian population, which is not fully visualized on a conventional knee radiograph (CKR) and may affect the assessment of coronal alignment. However, postoperatively, CKR is easy to perform and has several advantages if it provides similar precision. Purpose: The purpose was to evaluate the validity of CKR in assessing the anatomical knee alignment and prosthesis position as compared with the LLR in Indian population. Materials and Methods: One hundred knees in 83 patients were subjected to CKR and LLR during postoperative follow-up at 6 weeks. Three parameters were evaluated to assess the coronal alignment and the component positions - femoral component angle (FCA), tibial component angle (TCA), and tibiofemoral angle (TFA). Results: There was an excellent correlation between the TCA as measured from the long and CKRs (r = 0.884, P = 0.01). There was a high positive correlation between the FCA (r = 0.703, P = 0.01) and TFA (r = 0.754, P = 0.01) as measured from the long radiographs and the conventional radiographs. Regression analysis defined these relationships to be linear. Conclusion: CKR could be an appropriate alternative for the LLR in evaluating the postoperative knee alignment and total knee prosthesis position despite the fact that there is excessive femoral bowing in Indian population.
format Article
id doaj-art-94ca11b430b64f72877dec10364efea0
institution OA Journals
issn 2347-3746
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopedics, Traumatology and Rehabilitation
spelling doaj-art-94ca11b430b64f72877dec10364efea02025-08-20T01:47:21ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Orthopedics, Traumatology and Rehabilitation2347-37462022-01-01141424510.4103/jotr.jotr_59_21Is Conventional Knee Radiograph Reliable Enough to Assess the Anatomical Knee Alignment and Total Knee Prosthesis Position in Indian Population?Suryamanikanta BalabadraBackground: The success and survivorship of primary total knee replacement mainly depend on the postoperative alignment and implant position. Long-leg radiograph (LLR) is considered gold standard in assessing knee alignment postoperatively. Studies have reported that bowing of the femoral shaft in the coronal plane is prevalent in Asian population, which is not fully visualized on a conventional knee radiograph (CKR) and may affect the assessment of coronal alignment. However, postoperatively, CKR is easy to perform and has several advantages if it provides similar precision. Purpose: The purpose was to evaluate the validity of CKR in assessing the anatomical knee alignment and prosthesis position as compared with the LLR in Indian population. Materials and Methods: One hundred knees in 83 patients were subjected to CKR and LLR during postoperative follow-up at 6 weeks. Three parameters were evaluated to assess the coronal alignment and the component positions - femoral component angle (FCA), tibial component angle (TCA), and tibiofemoral angle (TFA). Results: There was an excellent correlation between the TCA as measured from the long and CKRs (r = 0.884, P = 0.01). There was a high positive correlation between the FCA (r = 0.703, P = 0.01) and TFA (r = 0.754, P = 0.01) as measured from the long radiographs and the conventional radiographs. Regression analysis defined these relationships to be linear. Conclusion: CKR could be an appropriate alternative for the LLR in evaluating the postoperative knee alignment and total knee prosthesis position despite the fact that there is excessive femoral bowing in Indian population.https://journals.lww.com/jotr/fulltext/2022/14010/is_conventional_knee_radiograph_reliable_enough_to.9.aspxconventional knee radiograph; coronal alignment posttotal knee arthroplasty; femur component angle; long-leg radiograph; tibial component angle; tibiofemoral angle
spellingShingle Suryamanikanta Balabadra
Is Conventional Knee Radiograph Reliable Enough to Assess the Anatomical Knee Alignment and Total Knee Prosthesis Position in Indian Population?
Journal of Orthopedics, Traumatology and Rehabilitation
conventional knee radiograph; coronal alignment posttotal knee arthroplasty; femur component angle; long-leg radiograph; tibial component angle; tibiofemoral angle
title Is Conventional Knee Radiograph Reliable Enough to Assess the Anatomical Knee Alignment and Total Knee Prosthesis Position in Indian Population?
title_full Is Conventional Knee Radiograph Reliable Enough to Assess the Anatomical Knee Alignment and Total Knee Prosthesis Position in Indian Population?
title_fullStr Is Conventional Knee Radiograph Reliable Enough to Assess the Anatomical Knee Alignment and Total Knee Prosthesis Position in Indian Population?
title_full_unstemmed Is Conventional Knee Radiograph Reliable Enough to Assess the Anatomical Knee Alignment and Total Knee Prosthesis Position in Indian Population?
title_short Is Conventional Knee Radiograph Reliable Enough to Assess the Anatomical Knee Alignment and Total Knee Prosthesis Position in Indian Population?
title_sort is conventional knee radiograph reliable enough to assess the anatomical knee alignment and total knee prosthesis position in indian population
topic conventional knee radiograph; coronal alignment posttotal knee arthroplasty; femur component angle; long-leg radiograph; tibial component angle; tibiofemoral angle
url https://journals.lww.com/jotr/fulltext/2022/14010/is_conventional_knee_radiograph_reliable_enough_to.9.aspx
work_keys_str_mv AT suryamanikantabalabadra isconventionalkneeradiographreliableenoughtoassesstheanatomicalkneealignmentandtotalkneeprosthesispositioninindianpopulation