Assessing Physician and Patient Agreement on Whether Patient Outcomes Captured in Clinical Progress Notes Reflect Treatment Success: Cross-Sectional Study

BackgroundIt remains unclear if there is agreement between physicians and patients on the definition of treatment success following orthopedic treatment. Clinical progress notes are generated during each health care encounter and include information on current disease symptom...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sarah B Floyd, Jordyn C Sutton, Marvin Okon, Mary McCarthy, Liza Fisher, Benjamin Judkins, Zachary Cole Reynolds, Ann Blair Kennedy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2025-01-01
Series:Journal of Participatory Medicine
Online Access:https://jopm.jmir.org/2025/1/e60263
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832590407630848000
author Sarah B Floyd
Jordyn C Sutton
Marvin Okon
Mary McCarthy
Liza Fisher
Benjamin Judkins
Zachary Cole Reynolds
Ann Blair Kennedy
author_facet Sarah B Floyd
Jordyn C Sutton
Marvin Okon
Mary McCarthy
Liza Fisher
Benjamin Judkins
Zachary Cole Reynolds
Ann Blair Kennedy
author_sort Sarah B Floyd
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundIt remains unclear if there is agreement between physicians and patients on the definition of treatment success following orthopedic treatment. Clinical progress notes are generated during each health care encounter and include information on current disease symptoms, rehabilitation progress, and treatment outcomes. ObjectiveThis study aims to assess if physicians and patients agree on whether patient outcomes captured in clinical progress notes reflect a successful treatment outcome following orthopedic care. MethodsWe performed a cross-sectional analysis of a subset of clinical notes for patients presenting to a Level-1 Trauma Center and Regional Health System for follow-up for an acute proximal humerus fracture (PHF). This study was part of a larger study of 1000 patients with PHF receiving initial treatment between 2019 and 2021. From the full dataset of 1000 physician-labeled notes, a stratified random sample of 25 notes from each outcome label group was identified for this study. A group of 2 patients then reviewed the sample of 100 clinical notes and labeled each note as reflecting treatment success or failure. Cohen κ statistics were used to assess the degree of agreement between physicians and patients on clinical note content. ResultsThe average age of the patients in the sample was 67 (SD 13) years and 82% of the notes came from female patients. Patients were primarily White (91%) and had Medicare insurance coverage (65%). The note sample came from fracture-related encounters ranging from the second to the tenth encounter after the index PHF visit. There were no significant differences in patient or visit characteristics across concordant and discordant notes labeled by physicians and patients. Among agreement levels ranging from poor to perfect agreement, physician and patient evaluators exhibited only a fair level of agreement in what they deemed as treatment success based on a Cohen κ of 0.32 (95% CI 0.10-0.55; P=.01). Furthermore, interpatient and interphysician agreement also demonstrated relatively low levels of agreement. ConclusionsThe findings suggest that physicians and patients demonstrated low levels of agreement when assessing whether a patient’s clinical note reflected a successful outcome following treatment for a PHF. As low levels of agreement were also observed within physician and patient groups, it is clear the definition of success varied highly across both physicians and patients. Further research is needed to elucidate physician and patient perceptions of treatment success. As outcome measurement and demonstrating the value of orthopedic treatment remain important priorities, it is important to better define and reach a consensus on what treatment success means in orthopedic medicine.
format Article
id doaj-art-94b41d08ec014840bb2b7d3ecb343242
institution Kabale University
issn 2152-7202
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Participatory Medicine
spelling doaj-art-94b41d08ec014840bb2b7d3ecb3432422025-01-23T21:30:31ZengJMIR PublicationsJournal of Participatory Medicine2152-72022025-01-0117e6026310.2196/60263Assessing Physician and Patient Agreement on Whether Patient Outcomes Captured in Clinical Progress Notes Reflect Treatment Success: Cross-Sectional StudySarah B Floydhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7412-8136Jordyn C Suttonhttps://orcid.org/0009-0005-4835-0944Marvin Okonhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7429-3713Mary McCarthyhttps://orcid.org/0009-0005-7828-5709Liza Fisherhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7222-5693Benjamin Judkinshttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1119-116XZachary Cole Reynoldshttps://orcid.org/0009-0009-2938-6924Ann Blair Kennedyhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3518-6314 BackgroundIt remains unclear if there is agreement between physicians and patients on the definition of treatment success following orthopedic treatment. Clinical progress notes are generated during each health care encounter and include information on current disease symptoms, rehabilitation progress, and treatment outcomes. ObjectiveThis study aims to assess if physicians and patients agree on whether patient outcomes captured in clinical progress notes reflect a successful treatment outcome following orthopedic care. MethodsWe performed a cross-sectional analysis of a subset of clinical notes for patients presenting to a Level-1 Trauma Center and Regional Health System for follow-up for an acute proximal humerus fracture (PHF). This study was part of a larger study of 1000 patients with PHF receiving initial treatment between 2019 and 2021. From the full dataset of 1000 physician-labeled notes, a stratified random sample of 25 notes from each outcome label group was identified for this study. A group of 2 patients then reviewed the sample of 100 clinical notes and labeled each note as reflecting treatment success or failure. Cohen κ statistics were used to assess the degree of agreement between physicians and patients on clinical note content. ResultsThe average age of the patients in the sample was 67 (SD 13) years and 82% of the notes came from female patients. Patients were primarily White (91%) and had Medicare insurance coverage (65%). The note sample came from fracture-related encounters ranging from the second to the tenth encounter after the index PHF visit. There were no significant differences in patient or visit characteristics across concordant and discordant notes labeled by physicians and patients. Among agreement levels ranging from poor to perfect agreement, physician and patient evaluators exhibited only a fair level of agreement in what they deemed as treatment success based on a Cohen κ of 0.32 (95% CI 0.10-0.55; P=.01). Furthermore, interpatient and interphysician agreement also demonstrated relatively low levels of agreement. ConclusionsThe findings suggest that physicians and patients demonstrated low levels of agreement when assessing whether a patient’s clinical note reflected a successful outcome following treatment for a PHF. As low levels of agreement were also observed within physician and patient groups, it is clear the definition of success varied highly across both physicians and patients. Further research is needed to elucidate physician and patient perceptions of treatment success. As outcome measurement and demonstrating the value of orthopedic treatment remain important priorities, it is important to better define and reach a consensus on what treatment success means in orthopedic medicine.https://jopm.jmir.org/2025/1/e60263
spellingShingle Sarah B Floyd
Jordyn C Sutton
Marvin Okon
Mary McCarthy
Liza Fisher
Benjamin Judkins
Zachary Cole Reynolds
Ann Blair Kennedy
Assessing Physician and Patient Agreement on Whether Patient Outcomes Captured in Clinical Progress Notes Reflect Treatment Success: Cross-Sectional Study
Journal of Participatory Medicine
title Assessing Physician and Patient Agreement on Whether Patient Outcomes Captured in Clinical Progress Notes Reflect Treatment Success: Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Assessing Physician and Patient Agreement on Whether Patient Outcomes Captured in Clinical Progress Notes Reflect Treatment Success: Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Assessing Physician and Patient Agreement on Whether Patient Outcomes Captured in Clinical Progress Notes Reflect Treatment Success: Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Physician and Patient Agreement on Whether Patient Outcomes Captured in Clinical Progress Notes Reflect Treatment Success: Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Assessing Physician and Patient Agreement on Whether Patient Outcomes Captured in Clinical Progress Notes Reflect Treatment Success: Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort assessing physician and patient agreement on whether patient outcomes captured in clinical progress notes reflect treatment success cross sectional study
url https://jopm.jmir.org/2025/1/e60263
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahbfloyd assessingphysicianandpatientagreementonwhetherpatientoutcomescapturedinclinicalprogressnotesreflecttreatmentsuccesscrosssectionalstudy
AT jordyncsutton assessingphysicianandpatientagreementonwhetherpatientoutcomescapturedinclinicalprogressnotesreflecttreatmentsuccesscrosssectionalstudy
AT marvinokon assessingphysicianandpatientagreementonwhetherpatientoutcomescapturedinclinicalprogressnotesreflecttreatmentsuccesscrosssectionalstudy
AT marymccarthy assessingphysicianandpatientagreementonwhetherpatientoutcomescapturedinclinicalprogressnotesreflecttreatmentsuccesscrosssectionalstudy
AT lizafisher assessingphysicianandpatientagreementonwhetherpatientoutcomescapturedinclinicalprogressnotesreflecttreatmentsuccesscrosssectionalstudy
AT benjaminjudkins assessingphysicianandpatientagreementonwhetherpatientoutcomescapturedinclinicalprogressnotesreflecttreatmentsuccesscrosssectionalstudy
AT zacharycolereynolds assessingphysicianandpatientagreementonwhetherpatientoutcomescapturedinclinicalprogressnotesreflecttreatmentsuccesscrosssectionalstudy
AT annblairkennedy assessingphysicianandpatientagreementonwhetherpatientoutcomescapturedinclinicalprogressnotesreflecttreatmentsuccesscrosssectionalstudy