Metaanalyzing Foucault’s Archaeology Theory
Foucault’s theoretical foundations have often undergone significant rotations. Foucault’s commentators usually divide his scientific period into the duality of archeology-genealogy or the triad of archeology-genealogy-ethics. In this paper, Foucault’s archeology was analyzed through a meta-theoretic...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fas |
| Published: |
Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)
2021-02-01
|
| Series: | پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_5778_29e4b15035f0421f2bc8c72a75ef49c2.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841555328344260608 |
|---|---|
| author | Masoud Zare Mehrjardy Ali Yousofi Saeideh Mirabi |
| author_facet | Masoud Zare Mehrjardy Ali Yousofi Saeideh Mirabi |
| author_sort | Masoud Zare Mehrjardy |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Foucault’s theoretical foundations have often undergone significant rotations. Foucault’s commentators usually divide his scientific period into the duality of archeology-genealogy or the triad of archeology-genealogy-ethics. In this paper, Foucault’s archeology was analyzed through a meta-theoretical approach based on a combined model. This model is a selection of Ritzer’s meta-theoretical logic (including four external-social, internal-social, external-intellectual, and internal-intellectual approaches) and Chalabi’s conceptual package (including four analytical elements of theory including theory-building equipment, theoretical claims range, theoretical functions, and Theoretical construction). The results show that although archeology is less important to researchers than genealogy; however, in addition to being an efficient theoretical approach to historical, sociological research, it provides a different perspective on society, history, knowledge, and knowledge; It is also a methodological approach with separate guidelines and with a fluid and flexible structure that can be used effectively in dynamic sociological, historical research and make it dynamic. The most important criticisms of archaeology are the neglect of political and historical complexities, the failure of the archaeology of knowledge as the subject of succession to epistemology, and philosophical vacuum and refusal to search for a meaningful source for restoring the scattered historical determination of human. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-948563af0f6f4a1389ac1e90d47e709b |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2383-1650 |
| language | fas |
| publishDate | 2021-02-01 |
| publisher | Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی |
| spelling | doaj-art-948563af0f6f4a1389ac1e90d47e709b2025-01-08T05:43:58ZfasInstitute for Humanities and Cultural Studies (IHCS)پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی2383-16502021-02-01201218721010.30465/crtls.2020.26214.15865778Metaanalyzing Foucault’s Archaeology TheoryMasoud Zare Mehrjardy0Ali Yousofi1Saeideh Mirabi2Ph.D. Student of Economic and Development Sociology, Department of Social Sciences, Ferdowsi University of MashhadAssociate Professor, Department of Social Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, IranPh.D. Student of Economic and Development Sociology, Department of Social Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, IranFoucault’s theoretical foundations have often undergone significant rotations. Foucault’s commentators usually divide his scientific period into the duality of archeology-genealogy or the triad of archeology-genealogy-ethics. In this paper, Foucault’s archeology was analyzed through a meta-theoretical approach based on a combined model. This model is a selection of Ritzer’s meta-theoretical logic (including four external-social, internal-social, external-intellectual, and internal-intellectual approaches) and Chalabi’s conceptual package (including four analytical elements of theory including theory-building equipment, theoretical claims range, theoretical functions, and Theoretical construction). The results show that although archeology is less important to researchers than genealogy; however, in addition to being an efficient theoretical approach to historical, sociological research, it provides a different perspective on society, history, knowledge, and knowledge; It is also a methodological approach with separate guidelines and with a fluid and flexible structure that can be used effectively in dynamic sociological, historical research and make it dynamic. The most important criticisms of archaeology are the neglect of political and historical complexities, the failure of the archaeology of knowledge as the subject of succession to epistemology, and philosophical vacuum and refusal to search for a meaningful source for restoring the scattered historical determination of human.https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_5778_29e4b15035f0421f2bc8c72a75ef49c2.pdfdiscoursearchivearchaeologymeta-theory |
| spellingShingle | Masoud Zare Mehrjardy Ali Yousofi Saeideh Mirabi Metaanalyzing Foucault’s Archaeology Theory پژوهشنامۀ انتقادی متون و برنامههای علوم انسانی discourse archive archaeology meta-theory |
| title | Metaanalyzing Foucault’s Archaeology Theory |
| title_full | Metaanalyzing Foucault’s Archaeology Theory |
| title_fullStr | Metaanalyzing Foucault’s Archaeology Theory |
| title_full_unstemmed | Metaanalyzing Foucault’s Archaeology Theory |
| title_short | Metaanalyzing Foucault’s Archaeology Theory |
| title_sort | metaanalyzing foucault s archaeology theory |
| topic | discourse archive archaeology meta-theory |
| url | https://criticalstudy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_5778_29e4b15035f0421f2bc8c72a75ef49c2.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT masoudzaremehrjardy metaanalyzingfoucaultsarchaeologytheory AT aliyousofi metaanalyzingfoucaultsarchaeologytheory AT saeidehmirabi metaanalyzingfoucaultsarchaeologytheory |