Sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction with end‐stage of renal disease
Abstract Aims Sacubitril/valsartan (SV) reduced heart failure hospitalization and cardiovascular mortality compared with enalapril in the Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ACE‐I to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure trial. However, this trial excluded patients with...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2020-06-01
|
Series: | ESC Heart Failure |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12659 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832544419872505856 |
---|---|
author | Seonhwa Lee Jaewon Oh Hyoeun Kim Jaehyung Ha Kyeong‐hyeon Chun Chan Joo Lee Sungha Park Sang‐Hak Lee Seok‐Min Kang |
author_facet | Seonhwa Lee Jaewon Oh Hyoeun Kim Jaehyung Ha Kyeong‐hyeon Chun Chan Joo Lee Sungha Park Sang‐Hak Lee Seok‐Min Kang |
author_sort | Seonhwa Lee |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Aims Sacubitril/valsartan (SV) reduced heart failure hospitalization and cardiovascular mortality compared with enalapril in the Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ACE‐I to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure trial. However, this trial excluded patients with end stage of renal disease (ESRD); thus, the efficacy and safety of SV in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) with ESRD remains uncertain. Methods and results We retrospectively analysed the clinical and laboratory data of 501 HFrEF patients who administered with SV from March 2017 to April 2019 in a single tertiary university hospital. A total of 23 HFrEF patients with ESRD on dialysis [58.3% non‐ischaemic heart failure; left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF): 29.7 ± 4.4%] were included in this study. At baseline and follow‐up visit, we evaluated cardiovascular biomarkers such as high‐sensitive troponin T (hsTnT), soluble ST2 (sST2), echocardiographic parameters, and clinical and adverse events. The mean dose of SV was 90 ± 43 mg/day at baseline and 123 ± 62 mg/day at last follow‐up (follow‐up duration: median 132 days). The level of hsTnT was significantly reduced from 236.2 ± 355.3 to 97.0 ± 14.0 pg/mL (P = 0.002), and the sST2 level was significantly reduced from 40.4 ± 44.0 to 19.6 ± 14.1 ng/mL (P = 0.005). LVEF was significantly improved from 29.7 ± 4.4% to 40.8 ± 10.4% (P = 0.002). During the follow‐up, up‐titration, down‐titration, and maintenance of SV dosing were observed in 7 (30%), 5 (21.7%), and 11 patients (47.8%), respectively. SV down‐titration group had adverse events including symptomatic hypotension (systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg) (n = 4) and dizziness (n = 1), but they did not discontinue SV therapy. Conclusions We found that SV could safely reduce the hsTnT and sST2 levels and improve LVEF in HFrEF patients with ESRD. As far as we know, this is the first study to show the efficacy and safety of SV in HFrEF with ESRD on dialysis. Larger prospective, long‐term follow‐up study should be warranted. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-947e9f96b24748938ab0a9d1799248d3 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2055-5822 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020-06-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | ESC Heart Failure |
spelling | doaj-art-947e9f96b24748938ab0a9d1799248d32025-02-03T10:25:46ZengWileyESC Heart Failure2055-58222020-06-01731125112910.1002/ehf2.12659Sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction with end‐stage of renal diseaseSeonhwa Lee0Jaewon Oh1Hyoeun Kim2Jaehyung Ha3Kyeong‐hyeon Chun4Chan Joo Lee5Sungha Park6Sang‐Hak Lee7Seok‐Min Kang8Division of Cardiology Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine 50‐1, Yonsei‐Ro, Seodaemun‐gu Seoul 03722 KoreaDivision of Cardiology Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine 50‐1, Yonsei‐Ro, Seodaemun‐gu Seoul 03722 KoreaDivision of Cardiology Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine 50‐1, Yonsei‐Ro, Seodaemun‐gu Seoul 03722 KoreaDivision of Cardiology Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine 50‐1, Yonsei‐Ro, Seodaemun‐gu Seoul 03722 KoreaDivision of Cardiology Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine 50‐1, Yonsei‐Ro, Seodaemun‐gu Seoul 03722 KoreaDivision of Cardiology Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine 50‐1, Yonsei‐Ro, Seodaemun‐gu Seoul 03722 KoreaDivision of Cardiology Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine 50‐1, Yonsei‐Ro, Seodaemun‐gu Seoul 03722 KoreaDivision of Cardiology Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine 50‐1, Yonsei‐Ro, Seodaemun‐gu Seoul 03722 KoreaDivision of Cardiology Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine 50‐1, Yonsei‐Ro, Seodaemun‐gu Seoul 03722 KoreaAbstract Aims Sacubitril/valsartan (SV) reduced heart failure hospitalization and cardiovascular mortality compared with enalapril in the Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ACE‐I to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure trial. However, this trial excluded patients with end stage of renal disease (ESRD); thus, the efficacy and safety of SV in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) with ESRD remains uncertain. Methods and results We retrospectively analysed the clinical and laboratory data of 501 HFrEF patients who administered with SV from March 2017 to April 2019 in a single tertiary university hospital. A total of 23 HFrEF patients with ESRD on dialysis [58.3% non‐ischaemic heart failure; left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF): 29.7 ± 4.4%] were included in this study. At baseline and follow‐up visit, we evaluated cardiovascular biomarkers such as high‐sensitive troponin T (hsTnT), soluble ST2 (sST2), echocardiographic parameters, and clinical and adverse events. The mean dose of SV was 90 ± 43 mg/day at baseline and 123 ± 62 mg/day at last follow‐up (follow‐up duration: median 132 days). The level of hsTnT was significantly reduced from 236.2 ± 355.3 to 97.0 ± 14.0 pg/mL (P = 0.002), and the sST2 level was significantly reduced from 40.4 ± 44.0 to 19.6 ± 14.1 ng/mL (P = 0.005). LVEF was significantly improved from 29.7 ± 4.4% to 40.8 ± 10.4% (P = 0.002). During the follow‐up, up‐titration, down‐titration, and maintenance of SV dosing were observed in 7 (30%), 5 (21.7%), and 11 patients (47.8%), respectively. SV down‐titration group had adverse events including symptomatic hypotension (systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg) (n = 4) and dizziness (n = 1), but they did not discontinue SV therapy. Conclusions We found that SV could safely reduce the hsTnT and sST2 levels and improve LVEF in HFrEF patients with ESRD. As far as we know, this is the first study to show the efficacy and safety of SV in HFrEF with ESRD on dialysis. Larger prospective, long‐term follow‐up study should be warranted.https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12659Sacubitril/valsartanHeart failure with reduced ejection fraction patientsEnd‐stage renal diseaseDialysis |
spellingShingle | Seonhwa Lee Jaewon Oh Hyoeun Kim Jaehyung Ha Kyeong‐hyeon Chun Chan Joo Lee Sungha Park Sang‐Hak Lee Seok‐Min Kang Sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction with end‐stage of renal disease ESC Heart Failure Sacubitril/valsartan Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients End‐stage renal disease Dialysis |
title | Sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction with end‐stage of renal disease |
title_full | Sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction with end‐stage of renal disease |
title_fullStr | Sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction with end‐stage of renal disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction with end‐stage of renal disease |
title_short | Sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction with end‐stage of renal disease |
title_sort | sacubitril valsartan in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction with end stage of renal disease |
topic | Sacubitril/valsartan Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients End‐stage renal disease Dialysis |
url | https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12659 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT seonhwalee sacubitrilvalsartaninpatientswithheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionwithendstageofrenaldisease AT jaewonoh sacubitrilvalsartaninpatientswithheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionwithendstageofrenaldisease AT hyoeunkim sacubitrilvalsartaninpatientswithheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionwithendstageofrenaldisease AT jaehyungha sacubitrilvalsartaninpatientswithheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionwithendstageofrenaldisease AT kyeonghyeonchun sacubitrilvalsartaninpatientswithheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionwithendstageofrenaldisease AT chanjoolee sacubitrilvalsartaninpatientswithheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionwithendstageofrenaldisease AT sunghapark sacubitrilvalsartaninpatientswithheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionwithendstageofrenaldisease AT sanghaklee sacubitrilvalsartaninpatientswithheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionwithendstageofrenaldisease AT seokminkang sacubitrilvalsartaninpatientswithheartfailurewithreducedejectionfractionwithendstageofrenaldisease |