Root Dentine Strain Generation during Root Canal Instrumentation with Rotation and Reciprocation Motions
The aim of the study is to measure and compare strain generated on root dentine surface by two different instrumentation motions. Thirty extracted single canal premolars were used in this study which randomly was divided into two groups, one group was prepared with ProTaper NEXT X2 file in rotation...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Erbil Polytechnic University
2020-06-01
|
| Series: | Polytechnic Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://polytechnic-journal.epu.edu.iq/home/vol10/iss2/11 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850210474317053952 |
|---|---|
| author | Bnar O. Hamafaraj Raed F. Salman |
| author_facet | Bnar O. Hamafaraj Raed F. Salman |
| author_sort | Bnar O. Hamafaraj |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The aim of the study is to measure and compare strain generated on root dentine surface by two
different instrumentation motions. Thirty extracted single canal premolars were used in this study
which randomly was divided into two groups, one group was prepared with ProTaper NEXT X2 file in
rotation motion, and the second group was prepared by WaveOne GOLD primary file in reciprocation
motion, the canals were irrigated during canal preparation by 2 ml of sodium hypochlorite and 17%
EDTA gel was used. Strain measurement was performed by strain gauges and a digital strain output
reader, data were recorded every 5 s for 50 s. The results of this study have shown that WaveOne
GOLD had higher mean 0.7308±0.41106 than ProTaper next 0.5385±0.39904 which means
WaveOne GOLD generates greater strain than ProTaper NEXT. However, according to Student’s
t-test between two groups there is no statistical difference between them. Based on the results of
this study, there was no difference between the two motions; both motions generated strain on
root dentine surface |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-9475247c34344895bca40c8df2355a24 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2707-7799 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2020-06-01 |
| publisher | Erbil Polytechnic University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Polytechnic Journal |
| spelling | doaj-art-9475247c34344895bca40c8df2355a242025-08-20T02:09:45ZengErbil Polytechnic UniversityPolytechnic Journal2707-77992020-06-011026670https://doi.org/10.25156/ptj.v10n2y2020.pp66-70Root Dentine Strain Generation during Root Canal Instrumentation with Rotation and Reciprocation MotionsBnar O. Hamafaraj0Raed F. Salman1Department of Conservative, College of Dentistry, Tishk International University, Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq,Department of Conservative, College of Dentistry, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Kurdistan Region, IraqThe aim of the study is to measure and compare strain generated on root dentine surface by two different instrumentation motions. Thirty extracted single canal premolars were used in this study which randomly was divided into two groups, one group was prepared with ProTaper NEXT X2 file in rotation motion, and the second group was prepared by WaveOne GOLD primary file in reciprocation motion, the canals were irrigated during canal preparation by 2 ml of sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA gel was used. Strain measurement was performed by strain gauges and a digital strain output reader, data were recorded every 5 s for 50 s. The results of this study have shown that WaveOne GOLD had higher mean 0.7308±0.41106 than ProTaper next 0.5385±0.39904 which means WaveOne GOLD generates greater strain than ProTaper NEXT. However, according to Student’s t-test between two groups there is no statistical difference between them. Based on the results of this study, there was no difference between the two motions; both motions generated strain on root dentine surfacehttps://polytechnic-journal.epu.edu.iq/home/vol10/iss2/11endodontics;instrumentation;reciprocation motion;root canal;root dentine strain;rotation motion |
| spellingShingle | Bnar O. Hamafaraj Raed F. Salman Root Dentine Strain Generation during Root Canal Instrumentation with Rotation and Reciprocation Motions Polytechnic Journal endodontics; instrumentation; reciprocation motion; root canal; root dentine strain; rotation motion |
| title | Root Dentine Strain Generation during Root Canal Instrumentation with Rotation and Reciprocation Motions |
| title_full | Root Dentine Strain Generation during Root Canal Instrumentation with Rotation and Reciprocation Motions |
| title_fullStr | Root Dentine Strain Generation during Root Canal Instrumentation with Rotation and Reciprocation Motions |
| title_full_unstemmed | Root Dentine Strain Generation during Root Canal Instrumentation with Rotation and Reciprocation Motions |
| title_short | Root Dentine Strain Generation during Root Canal Instrumentation with Rotation and Reciprocation Motions |
| title_sort | root dentine strain generation during root canal instrumentation with rotation and reciprocation motions |
| topic | endodontics; instrumentation; reciprocation motion; root canal; root dentine strain; rotation motion |
| url | https://polytechnic-journal.epu.edu.iq/home/vol10/iss2/11 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT bnarohamafaraj rootdentinestraingenerationduringrootcanalinstrumentationwithrotationandreciprocationmotions AT raedfsalman rootdentinestraingenerationduringrootcanalinstrumentationwithrotationandreciprocationmotions |