Need for Speed: Lower mortality and earlier targeted treatment with BCID2 panel: Preliminary report from an Indian ICU

Background: BIOFIRE Blood Culture Identification 2(BCID2) panel, a rapid molecular diagnostic platform, identifies the organism and its molecular mechanism of resistance within two hours of the blood culture bottle flagging positive. This is the first Indian study to evaluate the impact of this pane...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dr Umang Agrawal, Dr Saidulu Ganta, Dr Sayli Gore, Dr Aditi Erande, Ms Aparna Naik, Dr Ayesha Sunavala, Dr Shaoli Basu, Dr Camilla Rodrigues
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-03-01
Series:International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971224007483
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850241002875387904
author Dr Umang Agrawal
Dr Saidulu Ganta
Dr Sayli Gore
Dr Aditi Erande
Ms Aparna Naik
Dr Ayesha Sunavala
Dr Shaoli Basu
Dr Camilla Rodrigues
author_facet Dr Umang Agrawal
Dr Saidulu Ganta
Dr Sayli Gore
Dr Aditi Erande
Ms Aparna Naik
Dr Ayesha Sunavala
Dr Shaoli Basu
Dr Camilla Rodrigues
author_sort Dr Umang Agrawal
collection DOAJ
description Background: BIOFIRE Blood Culture Identification 2(BCID2) panel, a rapid molecular diagnostic platform, identifies the organism and its molecular mechanism of resistance within two hours of the blood culture bottle flagging positive. This is the first Indian study to evaluate the impact of this panel on real-world antimicrobial stewardship practices and clinical outcomes in an Indian ICU. Methods: This pre-post quasi-experimental study; performed at a tertiary care centre ICU in Mumbai, India; comprised of two cohorts: The Intervention/Prospective Cohort[BCID2](1st January 2023- 31st October 2023) and the Control/Retrospective cohort[Standard of Care (SOC)](1st January 2020- 31st October 2020). ICU patients with documented bacteremia/fungemia were included. Phenotypic Blood culture and susceptibility testing [using current CLSI breakpoints on VITEK-2(BioMérieux, France)] was performed as SOC in both cohorts. BCID2 panel(Biomerieux, France) was run additionally in the Intervention cohort when the blood culture bottle flagged positive. Primary and secondary outcomes were recorded. (Figure 3) Interim analysis for the first six months (January-June) is presented.Statistical analysis was performed on MedCalc(V22). Continuous and categorical variables were compared using Mann-Whitney U test and chi-square respectively. Univariate analysis was performed to analyse predictors of mortality. Logistic regression analysis was performed for variables demonstrating p<0.05 to assess independent association. Tests were interpreted at 5% significance. Results: The final analysis comprised of 145 patients in the Intention to Treat (ITT) Analysis. Both cohorts had similar baseline characteristics (Figure 2). Time to appropriate therapy was shorter in the BCID2 cohort, but was statistically insignificant [5.75 hours vs 15 hours, p=0.369). However, after excluding those on appropriate antibiotics prior to Gram stain and where contaminants were not treated [Per protocol (PP) analysis, Figures 1 and 3], the BCID2 cohort showed a statistically significant shorter time from Gram stain to appropriate therapy compared to SOC [17 hours vs 35.75 hours, p=0.026]. Time to organism identification, and in-hospital mortality were significantly lower in the BCID2 cohort (ITT analysis) (Figure 3).Logistic regression analysis in the ITT analysis showed that BCID2 use was independently associated with 67% lower incidence of mortality [aOR: 0.33 (95%CI:0.14-0.75), p=0.0078]. Pitts Bacteremia score [aOR: 1.38 (95%CI:1.20-1.6), p=0.0001] and invasive candidiasis [aOR: 20.32 (95% CI:1.83-225.77), p=0.014] were other independent predictors of mortality. Discussion: Despite its limitations (non-randomized study, lack of data on antibiotic consumption and financial outcomes), the preliminary findings of this study demonstrated earlier targeted treatments and mortality benefit in a real-world setting with the BCID2 panel use. This study also gave us an opportunity to reflect on the gaps in our antimicrobial prescribing practices and the need to implement earlier de-escalation strategies. Conclusion: With a significant impact on stewardship measures and clinical outcomes (especially mortality), BCID2 panel holds promise in an Indian ICU.
format Article
id doaj-art-946639d613894bfdaa2be3e55c90706e
institution OA Journals
issn 1201-9712
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series International Journal of Infectious Diseases
spelling doaj-art-946639d613894bfdaa2be3e55c90706e2025-08-20T02:00:42ZengElsevierInternational Journal of Infectious Diseases1201-97122025-03-0115210767310.1016/j.ijid.2024.107673Need for Speed: Lower mortality and earlier targeted treatment with BCID2 panel: Preliminary report from an Indian ICUDr Umang Agrawal0Dr Saidulu Ganta1Dr Sayli Gore2Dr Aditi Erande3Ms Aparna Naik4Dr Ayesha Sunavala5Dr Shaoli Basu6Dr Camilla Rodrigues7Pd Hinduja Hospital And MrcPd Hinduja Hospital And MrcPd Hinduja Hospital And MrcPd Hinduja Hospital And MrcPd Hinduja Hospital And MrcPd Hinduja Hospital And MrcPd Hinduja Hospital And MrcPd Hinduja Hospital And MrcBackground: BIOFIRE Blood Culture Identification 2(BCID2) panel, a rapid molecular diagnostic platform, identifies the organism and its molecular mechanism of resistance within two hours of the blood culture bottle flagging positive. This is the first Indian study to evaluate the impact of this panel on real-world antimicrobial stewardship practices and clinical outcomes in an Indian ICU. Methods: This pre-post quasi-experimental study; performed at a tertiary care centre ICU in Mumbai, India; comprised of two cohorts: The Intervention/Prospective Cohort[BCID2](1st January 2023- 31st October 2023) and the Control/Retrospective cohort[Standard of Care (SOC)](1st January 2020- 31st October 2020). ICU patients with documented bacteremia/fungemia were included. Phenotypic Blood culture and susceptibility testing [using current CLSI breakpoints on VITEK-2(BioMérieux, France)] was performed as SOC in both cohorts. BCID2 panel(Biomerieux, France) was run additionally in the Intervention cohort when the blood culture bottle flagged positive. Primary and secondary outcomes were recorded. (Figure 3) Interim analysis for the first six months (January-June) is presented.Statistical analysis was performed on MedCalc(V22). Continuous and categorical variables were compared using Mann-Whitney U test and chi-square respectively. Univariate analysis was performed to analyse predictors of mortality. Logistic regression analysis was performed for variables demonstrating p<0.05 to assess independent association. Tests were interpreted at 5% significance. Results: The final analysis comprised of 145 patients in the Intention to Treat (ITT) Analysis. Both cohorts had similar baseline characteristics (Figure 2). Time to appropriate therapy was shorter in the BCID2 cohort, but was statistically insignificant [5.75 hours vs 15 hours, p=0.369). However, after excluding those on appropriate antibiotics prior to Gram stain and where contaminants were not treated [Per protocol (PP) analysis, Figures 1 and 3], the BCID2 cohort showed a statistically significant shorter time from Gram stain to appropriate therapy compared to SOC [17 hours vs 35.75 hours, p=0.026]. Time to organism identification, and in-hospital mortality were significantly lower in the BCID2 cohort (ITT analysis) (Figure 3).Logistic regression analysis in the ITT analysis showed that BCID2 use was independently associated with 67% lower incidence of mortality [aOR: 0.33 (95%CI:0.14-0.75), p=0.0078]. Pitts Bacteremia score [aOR: 1.38 (95%CI:1.20-1.6), p=0.0001] and invasive candidiasis [aOR: 20.32 (95% CI:1.83-225.77), p=0.014] were other independent predictors of mortality. Discussion: Despite its limitations (non-randomized study, lack of data on antibiotic consumption and financial outcomes), the preliminary findings of this study demonstrated earlier targeted treatments and mortality benefit in a real-world setting with the BCID2 panel use. This study also gave us an opportunity to reflect on the gaps in our antimicrobial prescribing practices and the need to implement earlier de-escalation strategies. Conclusion: With a significant impact on stewardship measures and clinical outcomes (especially mortality), BCID2 panel holds promise in an Indian ICU.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971224007483
spellingShingle Dr Umang Agrawal
Dr Saidulu Ganta
Dr Sayli Gore
Dr Aditi Erande
Ms Aparna Naik
Dr Ayesha Sunavala
Dr Shaoli Basu
Dr Camilla Rodrigues
Need for Speed: Lower mortality and earlier targeted treatment with BCID2 panel: Preliminary report from an Indian ICU
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
title Need for Speed: Lower mortality and earlier targeted treatment with BCID2 panel: Preliminary report from an Indian ICU
title_full Need for Speed: Lower mortality and earlier targeted treatment with BCID2 panel: Preliminary report from an Indian ICU
title_fullStr Need for Speed: Lower mortality and earlier targeted treatment with BCID2 panel: Preliminary report from an Indian ICU
title_full_unstemmed Need for Speed: Lower mortality and earlier targeted treatment with BCID2 panel: Preliminary report from an Indian ICU
title_short Need for Speed: Lower mortality and earlier targeted treatment with BCID2 panel: Preliminary report from an Indian ICU
title_sort need for speed lower mortality and earlier targeted treatment with bcid2 panel preliminary report from an indian icu
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971224007483
work_keys_str_mv AT drumangagrawal needforspeedlowermortalityandearliertargetedtreatmentwithbcid2panelpreliminaryreportfromanindianicu
AT drsaiduluganta needforspeedlowermortalityandearliertargetedtreatmentwithbcid2panelpreliminaryreportfromanindianicu
AT drsayligore needforspeedlowermortalityandearliertargetedtreatmentwithbcid2panelpreliminaryreportfromanindianicu
AT draditierande needforspeedlowermortalityandearliertargetedtreatmentwithbcid2panelpreliminaryreportfromanindianicu
AT msaparnanaik needforspeedlowermortalityandearliertargetedtreatmentwithbcid2panelpreliminaryreportfromanindianicu
AT drayeshasunavala needforspeedlowermortalityandearliertargetedtreatmentwithbcid2panelpreliminaryreportfromanindianicu
AT drshaolibasu needforspeedlowermortalityandearliertargetedtreatmentwithbcid2panelpreliminaryreportfromanindianicu
AT drcamillarodrigues needforspeedlowermortalityandearliertargetedtreatmentwithbcid2panelpreliminaryreportfromanindianicu