Sensorimotor rhythm neurofeedback training and auditory perception
Background/Aim. In everyday communication, people are exposed to a myriad of sounds that need to be sorted and relevant information extracted. The ability of a person to concentrate on certain sounds in a noisy background environment, perform selective attention, and focus their auditory attention i...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Serbia, University of Defence, Belgrade
2023-01-01
|
| Series: | Vojnosanitetski Pregled |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0042-8450/2023/0042-84502200033S.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850210404265885696 |
|---|---|
| author | Stanković Ivana Ilić Nela V. Ilić Tihomir V. Jeličić Ljiljana Sovilj Mirjana Martić Vesna Punišić Silvana Stokić Miodrag |
| author_facet | Stanković Ivana Ilić Nela V. Ilić Tihomir V. Jeličić Ljiljana Sovilj Mirjana Martić Vesna Punišić Silvana Stokić Miodrag |
| author_sort | Stanković Ivana |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background/Aim. In everyday communication, people are exposed to a myriad of sounds that need to be sorted and relevant information extracted. The ability of a person to concentrate on certain sounds in a noisy background environment, perform selective attention, and focus their auditory attention is crucial for everyday functioning and communication. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) (12–15 Hz) neurofeedback (NFB) training to improve auditory cognition measured by the achievements in the Quick speech-in-noise (QuickSIN) test, changes in the amplitudes and latencies of components of auditory evoked potentials (AEP) N100, N200, and P300 in the auditory oddball discrimination task, and changes in the spectral power of the SMR. Methods. The study included 16 healthy participants aged 25–40 years (8 males and 8 females). Each participant had 20 daily sessions of SMR NFB training. Auditory cognitive functions and electrophysiological correlates of cognitive processing were recorded 5 times – before NFB, after 5, 10, and 20 sessions, and one month after the last session of NFB. Re-sults. The results showed a statistically significant decrease in N200 and P300 latencies at frontal midline (Fz), central midline (Cz), and parietal midline (Pz) regions, an improvement on the QuickSIN test, and an increase in electroencephalogram SMR rhythm spectral power in the Cz region as a result of the NFB SMR training. No significant effect of the NFB training on the N100, N200, and P300 amplitudes on Fz, Cz, and Pz was found. Conclusion. The obtained results suggest that SMR NFB affects auditory perception in terms of shorter latencies of AEP and better performance on the QuickSIN test. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-945ed2684e5a4d64b6ea396f4c0db5cc |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 0042-8450 2406-0720 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
| publisher | Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Serbia, University of Defence, Belgrade |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Vojnosanitetski Pregled |
| spelling | doaj-art-945ed2684e5a4d64b6ea396f4c0db5cc2025-08-20T02:09:47ZengMinistry of Defence of the Republic of Serbia, University of Defence, BelgradeVojnosanitetski Pregled0042-84502406-07202023-01-0180322823410.2298/VSP210902033S0042-84502200033SSensorimotor rhythm neurofeedback training and auditory perceptionStanković Ivana0Ilić Nela V.1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4905-0861Ilić Tihomir V.2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4325-5498Jeličić Ljiljana3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0391-1366Sovilj Mirjana4https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5646-1728Martić Vesna5Punišić Silvana6Stokić Miodrag7https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9095-5286Institute for Experimental Phonetics and Speech Pathology “Djordje Kostić”, Belgrade, SerbiaUniversity of Belgrade, Faculty of Medicine, Belgrade, Serbia + University Clinical Center of Serbia, Clinic for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Belgrade, SerbiaUniversity of Defence, Faculty of Medicine of the Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, SerbiaResearch and Development Institute – Life Activities Advancement Center, Belgrade, SerbiaInstitute for Experimental Phonetics and Speech Pathology “Djordje Kostić”, Belgrade, SerbiaUniversity of Defence, Faculty of Medicine of the Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, SerbiaResearch and Development Institute – Life Activities Advancement Center, Belgrade, SerbiaResearch and Development Institute – Life Activities Advancement Center, Belgrade, SerbiaBackground/Aim. In everyday communication, people are exposed to a myriad of sounds that need to be sorted and relevant information extracted. The ability of a person to concentrate on certain sounds in a noisy background environment, perform selective attention, and focus their auditory attention is crucial for everyday functioning and communication. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) (12–15 Hz) neurofeedback (NFB) training to improve auditory cognition measured by the achievements in the Quick speech-in-noise (QuickSIN) test, changes in the amplitudes and latencies of components of auditory evoked potentials (AEP) N100, N200, and P300 in the auditory oddball discrimination task, and changes in the spectral power of the SMR. Methods. The study included 16 healthy participants aged 25–40 years (8 males and 8 females). Each participant had 20 daily sessions of SMR NFB training. Auditory cognitive functions and electrophysiological correlates of cognitive processing were recorded 5 times – before NFB, after 5, 10, and 20 sessions, and one month after the last session of NFB. Re-sults. The results showed a statistically significant decrease in N200 and P300 latencies at frontal midline (Fz), central midline (Cz), and parietal midline (Pz) regions, an improvement on the QuickSIN test, and an increase in electroencephalogram SMR rhythm spectral power in the Cz region as a result of the NFB SMR training. No significant effect of the NFB training on the N100, N200, and P300 amplitudes on Fz, Cz, and Pz was found. Conclusion. The obtained results suggest that SMR NFB affects auditory perception in terms of shorter latencies of AEP and better performance on the QuickSIN test.https://doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0042-8450/2023/0042-84502200033S.pdfauditory perceptioncognitionelectroencephalographyevent-related potentials, p300evoked potentials, auditoryfeedback, sensory |
| spellingShingle | Stanković Ivana Ilić Nela V. Ilić Tihomir V. Jeličić Ljiljana Sovilj Mirjana Martić Vesna Punišić Silvana Stokić Miodrag Sensorimotor rhythm neurofeedback training and auditory perception Vojnosanitetski Pregled auditory perception cognition electroencephalography event-related potentials, p300 evoked potentials, auditory feedback, sensory |
| title | Sensorimotor rhythm neurofeedback training and auditory perception |
| title_full | Sensorimotor rhythm neurofeedback training and auditory perception |
| title_fullStr | Sensorimotor rhythm neurofeedback training and auditory perception |
| title_full_unstemmed | Sensorimotor rhythm neurofeedback training and auditory perception |
| title_short | Sensorimotor rhythm neurofeedback training and auditory perception |
| title_sort | sensorimotor rhythm neurofeedback training and auditory perception |
| topic | auditory perception cognition electroencephalography event-related potentials, p300 evoked potentials, auditory feedback, sensory |
| url | https://doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0042-8450/2023/0042-84502200033S.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT stankovicivana sensorimotorrhythmneurofeedbacktrainingandauditoryperception AT ilicnelav sensorimotorrhythmneurofeedbacktrainingandauditoryperception AT ilictihomirv sensorimotorrhythmneurofeedbacktrainingandauditoryperception AT jelicicljiljana sensorimotorrhythmneurofeedbacktrainingandauditoryperception AT soviljmirjana sensorimotorrhythmneurofeedbacktrainingandauditoryperception AT marticvesna sensorimotorrhythmneurofeedbacktrainingandauditoryperception AT punisicsilvana sensorimotorrhythmneurofeedbacktrainingandauditoryperception AT stokicmiodrag sensorimotorrhythmneurofeedbacktrainingandauditoryperception |