O the places rural children will go…to get physical activity: a cross sectional analysis

Abstract Purpose Youth living in rural areas have higher risk for overweight/obesity. It is important to understand where these children engage in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and sedentary time to encourage or intervene on activity in specific locations. This study compared MVPA an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bethany Forseth, Jordan A. Carlson, Adrian Ortega, Chelsea Steel, Brittany Lancaster, Lauren K. Fitzpatrick, Qianxia Jiang, Ann M. Davis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-03-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-22442-8
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850208705130266624
author Bethany Forseth
Jordan A. Carlson
Adrian Ortega
Chelsea Steel
Brittany Lancaster
Lauren K. Fitzpatrick
Qianxia Jiang
Ann M. Davis
author_facet Bethany Forseth
Jordan A. Carlson
Adrian Ortega
Chelsea Steel
Brittany Lancaster
Lauren K. Fitzpatrick
Qianxia Jiang
Ann M. Davis
author_sort Bethany Forseth
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Purpose Youth living in rural areas have higher risk for overweight/obesity. It is important to understand where these children engage in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and sedentary time to encourage or intervene on activity in specific locations. This study compared MVPA and sedentary time across locations among children with overweight/obesity in the rural Midwest of the U.S. Methods Participants wore an accelerometer and Global Positioning System tracker over 7-days to collect data on MVPA, sedentary time, and location. Locations were categorized as Home, Home Neighborhood, School, School Neighborhood, and ‘Other’. Differences based on school and non-school days were examined. Results Participants (n = 44; 8.8 ± 0.8 years; 61.4% females) engaged in an average of 41.4 min of MVPA/day and 6.7 h of sedentary time/day. In total, most MVPA was obtained at School (18.2 min/day, 44.2% of total MVPA), followed by Other (22.7%) and Home (20.5%). Participants accrued most of their sedentary time at School (141.7 min/day, 35.3%) followed by Home (31.2%) and Other locations (20.3%). Relative to time spent in location, participants were least active in their School Neighborhood (3.7% of time was in MVPA) and most active in Other locations (7.0%). When comparing non-school and school days, participants obtained 95.7 more minutes sedentary time at Home and were in Other locations for almost 2.5 more hours more on non-school days than school days. During school days, participants obtained 25.0 min/day of MVPA at school. Conclusion The School location is supportive of MVPA and high amounts of sedentary time. In addition to supporting children to travel to locations where they are likely to be active, efforts are needed to increase activity in locations where children spend substantial time. Providing more opportunities for activity in/around the home and reducing sedentary time during school may be promising targets for improving health among rural children.
format Article
id doaj-art-9412abd33aaf4d44a76962f806a4cc53
institution OA Journals
issn 1471-2458
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Public Health
spelling doaj-art-9412abd33aaf4d44a76962f806a4cc532025-08-20T02:10:10ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582025-03-0125111310.1186/s12889-025-22442-8O the places rural children will go…to get physical activity: a cross sectional analysisBethany Forseth0Jordan A. Carlson1Adrian Ortega2Chelsea Steel3Brittany Lancaster4Lauren K. Fitzpatrick5Qianxia Jiang6Ann M. Davis7Department of Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation Science, & Athletic Training, University of Kansas Medical CenterCenter for Children’s Healthy Lifestyles & NutritionCenter for Children’s Healthy Lifestyles & NutritionCenter for Children’s Healthy Lifestyles & NutritionDepartment of Psychology, Mississippi State UniversityCenter for Children’s Healthy Lifestyles & NutritionDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Central FloridaCenter for Children’s Healthy Lifestyles & NutritionAbstract Purpose Youth living in rural areas have higher risk for overweight/obesity. It is important to understand where these children engage in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and sedentary time to encourage or intervene on activity in specific locations. This study compared MVPA and sedentary time across locations among children with overweight/obesity in the rural Midwest of the U.S. Methods Participants wore an accelerometer and Global Positioning System tracker over 7-days to collect data on MVPA, sedentary time, and location. Locations were categorized as Home, Home Neighborhood, School, School Neighborhood, and ‘Other’. Differences based on school and non-school days were examined. Results Participants (n = 44; 8.8 ± 0.8 years; 61.4% females) engaged in an average of 41.4 min of MVPA/day and 6.7 h of sedentary time/day. In total, most MVPA was obtained at School (18.2 min/day, 44.2% of total MVPA), followed by Other (22.7%) and Home (20.5%). Participants accrued most of their sedentary time at School (141.7 min/day, 35.3%) followed by Home (31.2%) and Other locations (20.3%). Relative to time spent in location, participants were least active in their School Neighborhood (3.7% of time was in MVPA) and most active in Other locations (7.0%). When comparing non-school and school days, participants obtained 95.7 more minutes sedentary time at Home and were in Other locations for almost 2.5 more hours more on non-school days than school days. During school days, participants obtained 25.0 min/day of MVPA at school. Conclusion The School location is supportive of MVPA and high amounts of sedentary time. In addition to supporting children to travel to locations where they are likely to be active, efforts are needed to increase activity in locations where children spend substantial time. Providing more opportunities for activity in/around the home and reducing sedentary time during school may be promising targets for improving health among rural children.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-22442-8MVPAYouthObesitySchoolHomeTrips
spellingShingle Bethany Forseth
Jordan A. Carlson
Adrian Ortega
Chelsea Steel
Brittany Lancaster
Lauren K. Fitzpatrick
Qianxia Jiang
Ann M. Davis
O the places rural children will go…to get physical activity: a cross sectional analysis
BMC Public Health
MVPA
Youth
Obesity
School
Home
Trips
title O the places rural children will go…to get physical activity: a cross sectional analysis
title_full O the places rural children will go…to get physical activity: a cross sectional analysis
title_fullStr O the places rural children will go…to get physical activity: a cross sectional analysis
title_full_unstemmed O the places rural children will go…to get physical activity: a cross sectional analysis
title_short O the places rural children will go…to get physical activity: a cross sectional analysis
title_sort o the places rural children will go to get physical activity a cross sectional analysis
topic MVPA
Youth
Obesity
School
Home
Trips
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-22442-8
work_keys_str_mv AT bethanyforseth otheplacesruralchildrenwillgotogetphysicalactivityacrosssectionalanalysis
AT jordanacarlson otheplacesruralchildrenwillgotogetphysicalactivityacrosssectionalanalysis
AT adrianortega otheplacesruralchildrenwillgotogetphysicalactivityacrosssectionalanalysis
AT chelseasteel otheplacesruralchildrenwillgotogetphysicalactivityacrosssectionalanalysis
AT brittanylancaster otheplacesruralchildrenwillgotogetphysicalactivityacrosssectionalanalysis
AT laurenkfitzpatrick otheplacesruralchildrenwillgotogetphysicalactivityacrosssectionalanalysis
AT qianxiajiang otheplacesruralchildrenwillgotogetphysicalactivityacrosssectionalanalysis
AT annmdavis otheplacesruralchildrenwillgotogetphysicalactivityacrosssectionalanalysis