Endoscopic band ligation alone and combined with clipping for colonic diverticular bleeding: A retrospective comparative study
Abstract Clipping alone or endoscopic band ligation (EBL) alone are the main endoscopic hemostatic methods for colonic diverticular bleeding (CDB). We have established a novel method combining EBL and clipping (EBL-C) for the hemostasis of CDB (Endoscopy E-videos); this study evaluated its usefulnes...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
|
| Series: | Endoscopy International Open |
| Online Access: | http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-2536-7884 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1823859626969399296 |
|---|---|
| author | Noritaka Ozawa Kenji Yamazaki Nae Hasebe Kazuki Yamauchi Kaori Koide Hiroyuki Murase Saeka Hayashi Takaaki Hino Daiki Hirota Atsushi Soga Kiichi Otani Naoya Masuda Hiroki Taniguchi Shogo Shimizu Masahito Shimizu |
| author_facet | Noritaka Ozawa Kenji Yamazaki Nae Hasebe Kazuki Yamauchi Kaori Koide Hiroyuki Murase Saeka Hayashi Takaaki Hino Daiki Hirota Atsushi Soga Kiichi Otani Naoya Masuda Hiroki Taniguchi Shogo Shimizu Masahito Shimizu |
| author_sort | Noritaka Ozawa |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract
Clipping alone or endoscopic band ligation (EBL) alone are the main endoscopic hemostatic methods for colonic diverticular bleeding (CDB). We have established a novel method combining EBL and clipping (EBL-C) for the hemostasis of CDB (Endoscopy E-videos); this study evaluated its usefulness. From March 2019 to July 2024, we endoscopically treated 138 patients for CDB at our institution. We retrospectively compared two groups: those treated with EBL (n=24) and those treated with EBL-C (n=56). Risk factors for early rebleeding were also examined in the EBL-C group. The rate of early rebleeding (defined as rebleeding occurring within 30 days) was lower in the EBL-C group than in the EBL group, although this difference was only marginally non-significant (8.9% vs. 25.0%, P=0.0776). The failure of neck formation was the only independent risk factor for rebleeding (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.076; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.015–0.398; P=0.0023). The frequency of neck formation was significantly higher in the EBL-C group (EBL-C: 89.3% vs. EBL: 66.7%, P=0.0235). Undergoing EBL-C was the only independent factor contributing to the successful development of neck formation (adjusted OR 7.01; 95%CI 1.41–34.8; P=0.0095). Previous treatment of the same diverticulum, neck formation failure, and insufficient clipping were risk factors for early rebleeding. Using EBL-C for CDB may be more effective in preventing rebleeding than using EBL alone, as it facilitates better ligation of the target diverticulum. The treatment of diverticula that are hard and difficult to manage with suction remains a challenge. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-93f3dfdda1b54eeb90a0ff43422d651f |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2364-3722 2196-9736 |
| language | English |
| publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Endoscopy International Open |
| spelling | doaj-art-93f3dfdda1b54eeb90a0ff43422d651f2025-02-11T00:06:54ZengGeorg Thieme Verlag KGEndoscopy International Open2364-37222196-973610.1055/a-2536-7884Endoscopic band ligation alone and combined with clipping for colonic diverticular bleeding: A retrospective comparative studyNoritaka Ozawa0Kenji Yamazaki1Nae Hasebe2Kazuki Yamauchi3Kaori Koide4Hiroyuki Murase5Saeka Hayashi6Takaaki Hino7Daiki Hirota8Atsushi Soga9Kiichi Otani10Naoya Masuda11Hiroki Taniguchi12Shogo Shimizu13Masahito Shimizu14Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center, Gifu, JapanDepartment of Gatroenterology, Gifu Prefectural General Medical CenterDepartment of Gatroenterology, Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center, Gifu, JapanDepartment of Gatroenterology, Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center, Gifu, JapanDepartment of Gatroenterology, Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center, Gifu, JapanDepartment of Gatroenterology, Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center, Gifu, JapanDepartment of Gatroenterology, Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center, Gifu, JapanDepartment of Gatroenterology, Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center, Gifu, JapanDepartment of Gatroenterology, Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center, Gifu, JapanGastroenterology, Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center, Gifu, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center, Gifu, JapanDepartment of Gatroenterology, Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center, Gifu, JapanDepartment of Gatroenterology, Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center, Gifu, JapanGastroenterology, Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center, Gifu, JapanDepartment of Gastroenterology/Internal Medicine, Gifu University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, JapanAbstract Clipping alone or endoscopic band ligation (EBL) alone are the main endoscopic hemostatic methods for colonic diverticular bleeding (CDB). We have established a novel method combining EBL and clipping (EBL-C) for the hemostasis of CDB (Endoscopy E-videos); this study evaluated its usefulness. From March 2019 to July 2024, we endoscopically treated 138 patients for CDB at our institution. We retrospectively compared two groups: those treated with EBL (n=24) and those treated with EBL-C (n=56). Risk factors for early rebleeding were also examined in the EBL-C group. The rate of early rebleeding (defined as rebleeding occurring within 30 days) was lower in the EBL-C group than in the EBL group, although this difference was only marginally non-significant (8.9% vs. 25.0%, P=0.0776). The failure of neck formation was the only independent risk factor for rebleeding (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.076; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.015–0.398; P=0.0023). The frequency of neck formation was significantly higher in the EBL-C group (EBL-C: 89.3% vs. EBL: 66.7%, P=0.0235). Undergoing EBL-C was the only independent factor contributing to the successful development of neck formation (adjusted OR 7.01; 95%CI 1.41–34.8; P=0.0095). Previous treatment of the same diverticulum, neck formation failure, and insufficient clipping were risk factors for early rebleeding. Using EBL-C for CDB may be more effective in preventing rebleeding than using EBL alone, as it facilitates better ligation of the target diverticulum. The treatment of diverticula that are hard and difficult to manage with suction remains a challenge.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-2536-7884 |
| spellingShingle | Noritaka Ozawa Kenji Yamazaki Nae Hasebe Kazuki Yamauchi Kaori Koide Hiroyuki Murase Saeka Hayashi Takaaki Hino Daiki Hirota Atsushi Soga Kiichi Otani Naoya Masuda Hiroki Taniguchi Shogo Shimizu Masahito Shimizu Endoscopic band ligation alone and combined with clipping for colonic diverticular bleeding: A retrospective comparative study Endoscopy International Open |
| title | Endoscopic band ligation alone and combined with clipping for colonic diverticular bleeding: A retrospective comparative study |
| title_full | Endoscopic band ligation alone and combined with clipping for colonic diverticular bleeding: A retrospective comparative study |
| title_fullStr | Endoscopic band ligation alone and combined with clipping for colonic diverticular bleeding: A retrospective comparative study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Endoscopic band ligation alone and combined with clipping for colonic diverticular bleeding: A retrospective comparative study |
| title_short | Endoscopic band ligation alone and combined with clipping for colonic diverticular bleeding: A retrospective comparative study |
| title_sort | endoscopic band ligation alone and combined with clipping for colonic diverticular bleeding a retrospective comparative study |
| url | http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-2536-7884 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT noritakaozawa endoscopicbandligationaloneandcombinedwithclippingforcolonicdiverticularbleedingaretrospectivecomparativestudy AT kenjiyamazaki endoscopicbandligationaloneandcombinedwithclippingforcolonicdiverticularbleedingaretrospectivecomparativestudy AT naehasebe endoscopicbandligationaloneandcombinedwithclippingforcolonicdiverticularbleedingaretrospectivecomparativestudy AT kazukiyamauchi endoscopicbandligationaloneandcombinedwithclippingforcolonicdiverticularbleedingaretrospectivecomparativestudy AT kaorikoide endoscopicbandligationaloneandcombinedwithclippingforcolonicdiverticularbleedingaretrospectivecomparativestudy AT hiroyukimurase endoscopicbandligationaloneandcombinedwithclippingforcolonicdiverticularbleedingaretrospectivecomparativestudy AT saekahayashi endoscopicbandligationaloneandcombinedwithclippingforcolonicdiverticularbleedingaretrospectivecomparativestudy AT takaakihino endoscopicbandligationaloneandcombinedwithclippingforcolonicdiverticularbleedingaretrospectivecomparativestudy AT daikihirota endoscopicbandligationaloneandcombinedwithclippingforcolonicdiverticularbleedingaretrospectivecomparativestudy AT atsushisoga endoscopicbandligationaloneandcombinedwithclippingforcolonicdiverticularbleedingaretrospectivecomparativestudy AT kiichiotani endoscopicbandligationaloneandcombinedwithclippingforcolonicdiverticularbleedingaretrospectivecomparativestudy AT naoyamasuda endoscopicbandligationaloneandcombinedwithclippingforcolonicdiverticularbleedingaretrospectivecomparativestudy AT hirokitaniguchi endoscopicbandligationaloneandcombinedwithclippingforcolonicdiverticularbleedingaretrospectivecomparativestudy AT shogoshimizu endoscopicbandligationaloneandcombinedwithclippingforcolonicdiverticularbleedingaretrospectivecomparativestudy AT masahitoshimizu endoscopicbandligationaloneandcombinedwithclippingforcolonicdiverticularbleedingaretrospectivecomparativestudy |