Influence of Error in Estimating Anisotropy Parameters on VTI Depth Imaging

Thin layers in sedimentary rocks lead to seismic anisotropy which makes the wave velocity dependent on the propagation angle. This aspect causes errors in seismic imaging such as mispositioning of migrated events if anisotropy is not accounted for. One of the challenging issues in seismic imaging is...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. Y. Moussavi Alashloo, D. P. Ghosh, Y. Bashir, W. Y. Wan Ismail
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-01-01
Series:International Journal of Geophysics
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2848750
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832556144500932608
author S. Y. Moussavi Alashloo
D. P. Ghosh
Y. Bashir
W. Y. Wan Ismail
author_facet S. Y. Moussavi Alashloo
D. P. Ghosh
Y. Bashir
W. Y. Wan Ismail
author_sort S. Y. Moussavi Alashloo
collection DOAJ
description Thin layers in sedimentary rocks lead to seismic anisotropy which makes the wave velocity dependent on the propagation angle. This aspect causes errors in seismic imaging such as mispositioning of migrated events if anisotropy is not accounted for. One of the challenging issues in seismic imaging is the estimation of anisotropy parameters which usually has error due to dependency on several elements such as sparse data acquisition and erroneous data with low signal-to-noise ratio. In this study, an isotropic and anelliptic VTI fast marching eikonal solvers are employed to obtain seismic travel times required for Kirchhoff depth migration algorithm. The algorithm solely uses compressional wave. Another objective is to study the influence of anisotropic errors on the imaging. Comparing the isotropic and VTI travel times demonstrates a considerable lateral difference of wavefronts. After Kirchhoff imaging with true anisotropy, as a reference, and with a model including error, results show that the VTI algorithm with error in anisotropic models produces images with minor mispositioning which is considerable for isotropic one specifically in deeper parts. Furthermore, over- or underestimating anisotropy parameters up to 30 percent are acceptable for imaging and beyond that cause considerable mispositioning.
format Article
id doaj-art-93e2d7be05d347a594a924b630162ae4
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-885X
1687-8868
language English
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Geophysics
spelling doaj-art-93e2d7be05d347a594a924b630162ae42025-02-03T05:46:11ZengWileyInternational Journal of Geophysics1687-885X1687-88682016-01-01201610.1155/2016/28487502848750Influence of Error in Estimating Anisotropy Parameters on VTI Depth ImagingS. Y. Moussavi Alashloo0D. P. Ghosh1Y. Bashir2W. Y. Wan Ismail3Center of Seismic Imaging, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, 32610 Seri Iskandar, MalaysiaCenter of Seismic Imaging, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, 32610 Seri Iskandar, MalaysiaCenter of Seismic Imaging, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, 32610 Seri Iskandar, MalaysiaCenter of Seismic Imaging, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, 32610 Seri Iskandar, MalaysiaThin layers in sedimentary rocks lead to seismic anisotropy which makes the wave velocity dependent on the propagation angle. This aspect causes errors in seismic imaging such as mispositioning of migrated events if anisotropy is not accounted for. One of the challenging issues in seismic imaging is the estimation of anisotropy parameters which usually has error due to dependency on several elements such as sparse data acquisition and erroneous data with low signal-to-noise ratio. In this study, an isotropic and anelliptic VTI fast marching eikonal solvers are employed to obtain seismic travel times required for Kirchhoff depth migration algorithm. The algorithm solely uses compressional wave. Another objective is to study the influence of anisotropic errors on the imaging. Comparing the isotropic and VTI travel times demonstrates a considerable lateral difference of wavefronts. After Kirchhoff imaging with true anisotropy, as a reference, and with a model including error, results show that the VTI algorithm with error in anisotropic models produces images with minor mispositioning which is considerable for isotropic one specifically in deeper parts. Furthermore, over- or underestimating anisotropy parameters up to 30 percent are acceptable for imaging and beyond that cause considerable mispositioning.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2848750
spellingShingle S. Y. Moussavi Alashloo
D. P. Ghosh
Y. Bashir
W. Y. Wan Ismail
Influence of Error in Estimating Anisotropy Parameters on VTI Depth Imaging
International Journal of Geophysics
title Influence of Error in Estimating Anisotropy Parameters on VTI Depth Imaging
title_full Influence of Error in Estimating Anisotropy Parameters on VTI Depth Imaging
title_fullStr Influence of Error in Estimating Anisotropy Parameters on VTI Depth Imaging
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Error in Estimating Anisotropy Parameters on VTI Depth Imaging
title_short Influence of Error in Estimating Anisotropy Parameters on VTI Depth Imaging
title_sort influence of error in estimating anisotropy parameters on vti depth imaging
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2848750
work_keys_str_mv AT symoussavialashloo influenceoferrorinestimatinganisotropyparametersonvtidepthimaging
AT dpghosh influenceoferrorinestimatinganisotropyparametersonvtidepthimaging
AT ybashir influenceoferrorinestimatinganisotropyparametersonvtidepthimaging
AT wywanismail influenceoferrorinestimatinganisotropyparametersonvtidepthimaging