Are peer reviewers encouraged to use reporting guidelines? A survey of 116 health research journals.
<h4>Background</h4>Pre-publication peer review of manuscripts should enhance the value of research publications to readers who may wish to utilize findings in clinical care or health policy-making. Much published research across all medical specialties is not useful, may be misleading, w...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Allison Hirst, Douglas G Altman |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2012-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0035621&type=printable |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research
by: Doug Altman, et al.
Published: (2019-05-01) -
A Review of Artificial Intelligence Research in Peer-Reviewed Communication Journals
by: Tugce Ertem-Eray, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
GUIDELINES FOR SUBMISSION, PEER REVIEW AND PUBLISHING OF MANUSCRIPTS IN THE “EURASIAN HEART JOURNAL”. EDITION OF GUIDELINES – MAY, 2020, COME INTO FORCE SINCE MAY, 2020
by: Article Editorial
Published: (2020-06-01) -
Kabale University Research Journal Authors Guidelines
by: Kabale University
Published: (2022) -
Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey.
by: Sarah L Gorst, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01)