Household living arrangements and disparities in hardship
BACKGROUND: Experiences of hardship, such as trouble paying bills and food insecurity, vary considerably across different household living arrangements, with relatively low levels among married-couple households. OBJECTIVE: We examine the extent to which disparities across household types can be exp...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research
2025-04-01
|
| Series: | Demographic Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.demographic-research.org/articles/volume/52/20 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849223048408858624 |
|---|---|
| author | John Iceland Jaehoon Cho |
| author_facet | John Iceland Jaehoon Cho |
| author_sort | John Iceland |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | BACKGROUND: Experiences of hardship, such as trouble paying bills and food insecurity, vary considerably across different household living arrangements, with relatively low levels among married-couple households. OBJECTIVE: We examine the extent to which disparities across household types can be explained by differences in income, non-income resources such as wealth, demographic characteristics, and socioeconomic characteristics such as education. METHODS: We used 2021 data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation and OLS regression and decomposition analysis to examine this issue. RESULTS: We confirmed that married-couple households experienced fewer hardships than other household types; single-parent families with children experienced the most hardships. Other household types, such as cohabiting couples and people living alone, fell in between. Among the factors associated with the differences, non-income resources – particularly wealth – played the most significant role, followed by income and then demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that income and especially the wealth-building capacity of different types of households are the most important factors explaining household hardship disparities. Meanwhile, selection into different household types by demographic and socioeconomic characteristics is moderately important. CONTRIBUTION: This study provides new information on why we observe differences in hardship across different types of households, including the important role played by wealth. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-929fe3c3dfb5440eb15f442b7c3017f0 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1435-9871 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-04-01 |
| publisher | Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Demographic Research |
| spelling | doaj-art-929fe3c3dfb5440eb15f442b7c3017f02025-08-26T00:00:44ZengMax Planck Institute for Demographic ResearchDemographic Research1435-98712025-04-01522058963410.4054/DemRes.2025.52.206791Household living arrangements and disparities in hardshipJohn Iceland0Jaehoon Cho1Pennsylvania State UniversityPennsylvania State UniversityBACKGROUND: Experiences of hardship, such as trouble paying bills and food insecurity, vary considerably across different household living arrangements, with relatively low levels among married-couple households. OBJECTIVE: We examine the extent to which disparities across household types can be explained by differences in income, non-income resources such as wealth, demographic characteristics, and socioeconomic characteristics such as education. METHODS: We used 2021 data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation and OLS regression and decomposition analysis to examine this issue. RESULTS: We confirmed that married-couple households experienced fewer hardships than other household types; single-parent families with children experienced the most hardships. Other household types, such as cohabiting couples and people living alone, fell in between. Among the factors associated with the differences, non-income resources – particularly wealth – played the most significant role, followed by income and then demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that income and especially the wealth-building capacity of different types of households are the most important factors explaining household hardship disparities. Meanwhile, selection into different household types by demographic and socioeconomic characteristics is moderately important. CONTRIBUTION: This study provides new information on why we observe differences in hardship across different types of households, including the important role played by wealth. https://www.demographic-research.org/articles/volume/52/20hardshiphousehold living arrangementshousehold typesincomepovertysociodemographic characteristicswealth |
| spellingShingle | John Iceland Jaehoon Cho Household living arrangements and disparities in hardship Demographic Research hardship household living arrangements household types income poverty sociodemographic characteristics wealth |
| title | Household living arrangements and disparities in hardship |
| title_full | Household living arrangements and disparities in hardship |
| title_fullStr | Household living arrangements and disparities in hardship |
| title_full_unstemmed | Household living arrangements and disparities in hardship |
| title_short | Household living arrangements and disparities in hardship |
| title_sort | household living arrangements and disparities in hardship |
| topic | hardship household living arrangements household types income poverty sociodemographic characteristics wealth |
| url | https://www.demographic-research.org/articles/volume/52/20 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT johniceland householdlivingarrangementsanddisparitiesinhardship AT jaehooncho householdlivingarrangementsanddisparitiesinhardship |