Plethysmographic variability index as a predictor of propofol-induced hypotension: A prospective observational study

Background: Propofol as an intravenous (IV) induction agent frequently causes significant hypotension and requires monitoring and prompt intervention. The plethysmographic waveform, obtained from a pulse oximeter, relies on two components of light absorption-red and infrared, representing changes in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joseph N Paul, Rashmi Rani, Nayanthara Joachim, Apoorwa N Kothari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara 2025-01-01
Series:Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ajmsjournal.info/index.php/AJMS/article/view/4317
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850051219559546880
author Joseph N Paul
Rashmi Rani
Nayanthara Joachim
Apoorwa N Kothari
author_facet Joseph N Paul
Rashmi Rani
Nayanthara Joachim
Apoorwa N Kothari
author_sort Joseph N Paul
collection DOAJ
description Background: Propofol as an intravenous (IV) induction agent frequently causes significant hypotension and requires monitoring and prompt intervention. The plethysmographic waveform, obtained from a pulse oximeter, relies on two components of light absorption-red and infrared, representing changes in blood volume and cardiovascular status of the patient. Aims and Objectives: The current study aimed to obtain a baseline value and positive predictive value (PPV) of plethysmographic variability index (PVI) to predict hypotension and also compare the PPV of PVI and perfusion index (PI) to predict hypotension induced by propofol. Materials and Methods: Seventy patients posted for elective surgery were first given IV crystalloids 2 h before surgery and then induced with propofol IV. Hemodynamic parameters, PI and PVI were recorded from baseline until 3 min post-intubation. Hypotension was defined as a fall in systolic blood pressure >30% or mean arterial pressure (MAP) <60 mmHg. Patients were then grouped into those who developed hypotension (Group H) and those who did not (Group NH). Statistical analysis of MAP, PVI, and PI was done. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted and analyzed. The PPV of PVI and PI was calculated and compared. Results: Hypotension occurred in 56 patients. The mean baseline MAP was lower in Group H (91.3±10.54 mmHg vs. 99.93±3.36 mmHg). The fall in MAP was highest at 3 min post-induction (Group H 59.38±7.09, Group NH 79.36±8.05). The difference in baseline PVI was not statistically significant (Group H 15.59±3.67, Group NH 15.43±5.65). PVI peaked in Group H when MAP was minimum (59.38±7.09 mmHg) at 3 min post-induction. The difference in baseline PI was not significant at any time point (Group H 1.13±1.02, Group NH 0.92±0.47) Area under the ROC curve of 0.534 for PVI and 0.559 for PI were not statistically significant hence showing no correlation between baseline PVI and PI and propofol-induced hypotension. Conclusion: Baseline PVI and PI can serve as screening tools and not diagnostic tools for predicting hypotension. Baseline PVI ≥19 is more accurate to predict post-induction hypotension than the values mentioned in previous studies.
format Article
id doaj-art-929d3dd389f148258d3e0a10faa273f4
institution DOAJ
issn 2467-9100
2091-0576
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara
record_format Article
series Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
spelling doaj-art-929d3dd389f148258d3e0a10faa273f42025-08-20T02:53:13ZengManipal College of Medical Sciences, PokharaAsian Journal of Medical Sciences2467-91002091-05762025-01-011612330https://doi.org/10.71152/ajms.v16i1.4317Plethysmographic variability index as a predictor of propofol-induced hypotension: A prospective observational studyJoseph N Paul 0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8136-0101Rashmi Rani 1https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4890-2735Nayanthara Joachim 2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9530-4423Apoorwa N Kothari 3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0703-1278Senior Registrar, Department of Anesthesiology, VPS Lakeshore Hospital, Kochi, Kerala, India Associate Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, St. John’s Medical College Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, St. John’s Medical College Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India Associate Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, St. John’s Medical College Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India Background: Propofol as an intravenous (IV) induction agent frequently causes significant hypotension and requires monitoring and prompt intervention. The plethysmographic waveform, obtained from a pulse oximeter, relies on two components of light absorption-red and infrared, representing changes in blood volume and cardiovascular status of the patient. Aims and Objectives: The current study aimed to obtain a baseline value and positive predictive value (PPV) of plethysmographic variability index (PVI) to predict hypotension and also compare the PPV of PVI and perfusion index (PI) to predict hypotension induced by propofol. Materials and Methods: Seventy patients posted for elective surgery were first given IV crystalloids 2 h before surgery and then induced with propofol IV. Hemodynamic parameters, PI and PVI were recorded from baseline until 3 min post-intubation. Hypotension was defined as a fall in systolic blood pressure >30% or mean arterial pressure (MAP) <60 mmHg. Patients were then grouped into those who developed hypotension (Group H) and those who did not (Group NH). Statistical analysis of MAP, PVI, and PI was done. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted and analyzed. The PPV of PVI and PI was calculated and compared. Results: Hypotension occurred in 56 patients. The mean baseline MAP was lower in Group H (91.3±10.54 mmHg vs. 99.93±3.36 mmHg). The fall in MAP was highest at 3 min post-induction (Group H 59.38±7.09, Group NH 79.36±8.05). The difference in baseline PVI was not statistically significant (Group H 15.59±3.67, Group NH 15.43±5.65). PVI peaked in Group H when MAP was minimum (59.38±7.09 mmHg) at 3 min post-induction. The difference in baseline PI was not significant at any time point (Group H 1.13±1.02, Group NH 0.92±0.47) Area under the ROC curve of 0.534 for PVI and 0.559 for PI were not statistically significant hence showing no correlation between baseline PVI and PI and propofol-induced hypotension. Conclusion: Baseline PVI and PI can serve as screening tools and not diagnostic tools for predicting hypotension. Baseline PVI ≥19 is more accurate to predict post-induction hypotension than the values mentioned in previous studies.https://ajmsjournal.info/index.php/AJMS/article/view/4317plethysmographic variability index; perfusion index; hypotension; propofol
spellingShingle Joseph N Paul
Rashmi Rani
Nayanthara Joachim
Apoorwa N Kothari
Plethysmographic variability index as a predictor of propofol-induced hypotension: A prospective observational study
Asian Journal of Medical Sciences
plethysmographic variability index; perfusion index; hypotension; propofol
title Plethysmographic variability index as a predictor of propofol-induced hypotension: A prospective observational study
title_full Plethysmographic variability index as a predictor of propofol-induced hypotension: A prospective observational study
title_fullStr Plethysmographic variability index as a predictor of propofol-induced hypotension: A prospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed Plethysmographic variability index as a predictor of propofol-induced hypotension: A prospective observational study
title_short Plethysmographic variability index as a predictor of propofol-induced hypotension: A prospective observational study
title_sort plethysmographic variability index as a predictor of propofol induced hypotension a prospective observational study
topic plethysmographic variability index; perfusion index; hypotension; propofol
url https://ajmsjournal.info/index.php/AJMS/article/view/4317
work_keys_str_mv AT josephnpaul plethysmographicvariabilityindexasapredictorofpropofolinducedhypotensionaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT rashmirani plethysmographicvariabilityindexasapredictorofpropofolinducedhypotensionaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT nayantharajoachim plethysmographicvariabilityindexasapredictorofpropofolinducedhypotensionaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT apoorwankothari plethysmographicvariabilityindexasapredictorofpropofolinducedhypotensionaprospectiveobservationalstudy