Do institutions matter for refugee integration? a comparison of case worker integration strategies in Switzerland and Canada

Abstract In this paper we explore the extent to which differences in institutional settings, with a focus on the human capital formation regime, shape the integration trajectories proposed to recently- arrived refugees. To do so, we compare two countries, Switzerland and Canada, which are committed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ihssane Otmani, Giuliano Bonoli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2025-07-01
Series:Comparative Migration Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-025-00470-y
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849237793048363008
author Ihssane Otmani
Giuliano Bonoli
author_facet Ihssane Otmani
Giuliano Bonoli
author_sort Ihssane Otmani
collection DOAJ
description Abstract In this paper we explore the extent to which differences in institutional settings, with a focus on the human capital formation regime, shape the integration trajectories proposed to recently- arrived refugees. To do so, we compare two countries, Switzerland and Canada, which are committed to implementing integration policy for refugees and belong to two different human capital formation regimes. We investigate whether ending up in a country with a collective skill formation system (Switzerland) limits refugee integration paths by “managing” their aspirations and directing them towards predefined options compared to a country with a more liberal human capital formation regime (Canada) where refugees may have more room of manoeuvre to fulfil their aspirations. In order to test this hypothesis, we used qualitative vignettes and compared integration paths proposed by case workers to refugees in a Swiss Canton (Vaud) and in a Canadian Province (Québec). We found that overall, the integration paths proposed are very similar, regardless of the institutional context. We reason that this largely unexpected result is due to the similarities in the overall orientation of integration policy; the similarity of the policy problem and labour market shortage in the low skill segment experienced in both countries.
format Article
id doaj-art-9249f29bba184e8ebd1f5492b063eb19
institution Kabale University
issn 2214-594X
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Comparative Migration Studies
spelling doaj-art-9249f29bba184e8ebd1f5492b063eb192025-08-20T04:01:52ZengSpringerOpenComparative Migration Studies2214-594X2025-07-0113111910.1186/s40878-025-00470-yDo institutions matter for refugee integration? a comparison of case worker integration strategies in Switzerland and CanadaIhssane Otmani0Giuliano Bonoli1Swiss Graduate School of Public Administration (IDHEAP), University of Lausanne, Quartier UNIL-Mouline, Bâtiment IDHEAPSwiss Graduate School of Public Administration (IDHEAP), University of Lausanne, Quartier UNIL-Mouline, Bâtiment IDHEAPAbstract In this paper we explore the extent to which differences in institutional settings, with a focus on the human capital formation regime, shape the integration trajectories proposed to recently- arrived refugees. To do so, we compare two countries, Switzerland and Canada, which are committed to implementing integration policy for refugees and belong to two different human capital formation regimes. We investigate whether ending up in a country with a collective skill formation system (Switzerland) limits refugee integration paths by “managing” their aspirations and directing them towards predefined options compared to a country with a more liberal human capital formation regime (Canada) where refugees may have more room of manoeuvre to fulfil their aspirations. In order to test this hypothesis, we used qualitative vignettes and compared integration paths proposed by case workers to refugees in a Swiss Canton (Vaud) and in a Canadian Province (Québec). We found that overall, the integration paths proposed are very similar, regardless of the institutional context. We reason that this largely unexpected result is due to the similarities in the overall orientation of integration policy; the similarity of the policy problem and labour market shortage in the low skill segment experienced in both countries.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-025-00470-yRefugees ‘aspirationsLabour integrationHuman capital formation regimenStreet level bureaucratsSwitzerlandCanada
spellingShingle Ihssane Otmani
Giuliano Bonoli
Do institutions matter for refugee integration? a comparison of case worker integration strategies in Switzerland and Canada
Comparative Migration Studies
Refugees ‘aspirations
Labour integration
Human capital formation regimen
Street level bureaucrats
Switzerland
Canada
title Do institutions matter for refugee integration? a comparison of case worker integration strategies in Switzerland and Canada
title_full Do institutions matter for refugee integration? a comparison of case worker integration strategies in Switzerland and Canada
title_fullStr Do institutions matter for refugee integration? a comparison of case worker integration strategies in Switzerland and Canada
title_full_unstemmed Do institutions matter for refugee integration? a comparison of case worker integration strategies in Switzerland and Canada
title_short Do institutions matter for refugee integration? a comparison of case worker integration strategies in Switzerland and Canada
title_sort do institutions matter for refugee integration a comparison of case worker integration strategies in switzerland and canada
topic Refugees ‘aspirations
Labour integration
Human capital formation regimen
Street level bureaucrats
Switzerland
Canada
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-025-00470-y
work_keys_str_mv AT ihssaneotmani doinstitutionsmatterforrefugeeintegrationacomparisonofcaseworkerintegrationstrategiesinswitzerlandandcanada
AT giulianobonoli doinstitutionsmatterforrefugeeintegrationacomparisonofcaseworkerintegrationstrategiesinswitzerlandandcanada