Evaluating the Role of Content in Subjective Video Quality Assessment
Video quality as perceived by human observers is the ground truth when Video Quality Assessment (VQA) is in question. It is dependent on many variables, one of them being the content of the video that is being evaluated. Despite the evidence that content has an impact on the quality score the sequen...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2014-01-01
|
| Series: | The Scientific World Journal |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/625219 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849692918282977280 |
|---|---|
| author | Milan Mirkovic Petar Vrgovic Dubravko Culibrk Darko Stefanovic Andras Anderla |
| author_facet | Milan Mirkovic Petar Vrgovic Dubravko Culibrk Darko Stefanovic Andras Anderla |
| author_sort | Milan Mirkovic |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Video quality as perceived by human observers is the ground truth when Video Quality Assessment (VQA) is in question. It is dependent on many variables, one of them being the content of the video that is being evaluated. Despite the evidence that content has an impact on the quality score the sequence receives from human evaluators, currently available VQA databases mostly comprise of sequences which fail to take this into account. In this paper, we aim to identify and analyze differences between human cognitive, affective, and conative responses to a set of videos commonly used for VQA and a set of videos specifically chosen to include video content which might affect the judgment of evaluators when perceived video quality is in question. Our findings indicate that considerable differences exist between the two sets on selected factors, which leads us to conclude that videos starring a different type of content than the currently employed ones might be more appropriate for VQA. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-92236e18ec3841f59ca5c6a682bf64ed |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2356-6140 1537-744X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2014-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | The Scientific World Journal |
| spelling | doaj-art-92236e18ec3841f59ca5c6a682bf64ed2025-08-20T03:20:36ZengWileyThe Scientific World Journal2356-61401537-744X2014-01-01201410.1155/2014/625219625219Evaluating the Role of Content in Subjective Video Quality AssessmentMilan Mirkovic0Petar Vrgovic1Dubravko Culibrk2Darko Stefanovic3Andras Anderla4University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Trg Dositeja Obradovica 6, 21000 Novi Sad, SerbiaUniversity of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Trg Dositeja Obradovica 6, 21000 Novi Sad, SerbiaUniversity of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Trg Dositeja Obradovica 6, 21000 Novi Sad, SerbiaUniversity of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Trg Dositeja Obradovica 6, 21000 Novi Sad, SerbiaUniversity of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Trg Dositeja Obradovica 6, 21000 Novi Sad, SerbiaVideo quality as perceived by human observers is the ground truth when Video Quality Assessment (VQA) is in question. It is dependent on many variables, one of them being the content of the video that is being evaluated. Despite the evidence that content has an impact on the quality score the sequence receives from human evaluators, currently available VQA databases mostly comprise of sequences which fail to take this into account. In this paper, we aim to identify and analyze differences between human cognitive, affective, and conative responses to a set of videos commonly used for VQA and a set of videos specifically chosen to include video content which might affect the judgment of evaluators when perceived video quality is in question. Our findings indicate that considerable differences exist between the two sets on selected factors, which leads us to conclude that videos starring a different type of content than the currently employed ones might be more appropriate for VQA.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/625219 |
| spellingShingle | Milan Mirkovic Petar Vrgovic Dubravko Culibrk Darko Stefanovic Andras Anderla Evaluating the Role of Content in Subjective Video Quality Assessment The Scientific World Journal |
| title | Evaluating the Role of Content in Subjective Video Quality Assessment |
| title_full | Evaluating the Role of Content in Subjective Video Quality Assessment |
| title_fullStr | Evaluating the Role of Content in Subjective Video Quality Assessment |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the Role of Content in Subjective Video Quality Assessment |
| title_short | Evaluating the Role of Content in Subjective Video Quality Assessment |
| title_sort | evaluating the role of content in subjective video quality assessment |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/625219 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT milanmirkovic evaluatingtheroleofcontentinsubjectivevideoqualityassessment AT petarvrgovic evaluatingtheroleofcontentinsubjectivevideoqualityassessment AT dubravkoculibrk evaluatingtheroleofcontentinsubjectivevideoqualityassessment AT darkostefanovic evaluatingtheroleofcontentinsubjectivevideoqualityassessment AT andrasanderla evaluatingtheroleofcontentinsubjectivevideoqualityassessment |