Evaluation and Comparison of Fracture Strength and Fluoride Releasing Properties of New Alkasite Materials with Conventional Restorative Material, Bulk Fill Composite and Glass Ionomer Cement: An In-Vitro Study
Aim: This study aimed to evaluate and compare fluoride ion release by Cention-N (self-cure and light-cure) and conventional glass-ionomer cement (GIC) at different pH levels and time intervals. Methodology: For fluoride release assessment, 240 samples (10 mm diameter, 2 mm height) of Cention-N and c...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2024-08-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_222_24 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850281824403587072 |
|---|---|
| author | Savan K. Kashiyani Shreya A. Khanna Leena Jobanputra Niharika Patel Hirenkumar P. Patel Apoorva D. Patel |
| author_facet | Savan K. Kashiyani Shreya A. Khanna Leena Jobanputra Niharika Patel Hirenkumar P. Patel Apoorva D. Patel |
| author_sort | Savan K. Kashiyani |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Aim:
This study aimed to evaluate and compare fluoride ion release by Cention-N (self-cure and light-cure) and conventional glass-ionomer cement (GIC) at different pH levels and time intervals.
Methodology:
For fluoride release assessment, 240 samples (10 mm diameter, 2 mm height) of Cention-N and conventional glass-ionomer cement were created using rubber rings. Samples were stored in deionized water, and the cumulative fluoride ion release and change in pH were assessed using a spectrophotometer and pH meter, respectively, at the end of 7 days, 14 days, and 21 days. The obtained data were subjected to statistical analysis.
Results:
All three samples exhibited very high fluoride release in an acidic medium compared to the neutral medium. Although GIC demonstrated superior fluoride release, Cention-N displayed adequate fluoride release over a longer duration.
Conclusions:
Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that both Glass ionomer cement and Cention-N showed an initial fluoride burst. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-921c7a7e6a8c423ea67f53b8d055480b |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 0976-4879 0975-7406 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-08-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
| spelling | doaj-art-921c7a7e6a8c423ea67f53b8d055480b2025-08-20T01:48:10ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences0976-48790975-74062024-08-0116Suppl 3S2291S229310.4103/jpbs.jpbs_222_24Evaluation and Comparison of Fracture Strength and Fluoride Releasing Properties of New Alkasite Materials with Conventional Restorative Material, Bulk Fill Composite and Glass Ionomer Cement: An In-Vitro StudySavan K. KashiyaniShreya A. KhannaLeena JobanputraNiharika PatelHirenkumar P. PatelApoorva D. PatelAim: This study aimed to evaluate and compare fluoride ion release by Cention-N (self-cure and light-cure) and conventional glass-ionomer cement (GIC) at different pH levels and time intervals. Methodology: For fluoride release assessment, 240 samples (10 mm diameter, 2 mm height) of Cention-N and conventional glass-ionomer cement were created using rubber rings. Samples were stored in deionized water, and the cumulative fluoride ion release and change in pH were assessed using a spectrophotometer and pH meter, respectively, at the end of 7 days, 14 days, and 21 days. The obtained data were subjected to statistical analysis. Results: All three samples exhibited very high fluoride release in an acidic medium compared to the neutral medium. Although GIC demonstrated superior fluoride release, Cention-N displayed adequate fluoride release over a longer duration. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that both Glass ionomer cement and Cention-N showed an initial fluoride burst.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_222_24cention-nfluoride ionglass-ionomer cementph change |
| spellingShingle | Savan K. Kashiyani Shreya A. Khanna Leena Jobanputra Niharika Patel Hirenkumar P. Patel Apoorva D. Patel Evaluation and Comparison of Fracture Strength and Fluoride Releasing Properties of New Alkasite Materials with Conventional Restorative Material, Bulk Fill Composite and Glass Ionomer Cement: An In-Vitro Study Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences cention-n fluoride ion glass-ionomer cement ph change |
| title | Evaluation and Comparison of Fracture Strength and Fluoride Releasing Properties of New Alkasite Materials with Conventional Restorative Material, Bulk Fill Composite and Glass Ionomer Cement: An In-Vitro Study |
| title_full | Evaluation and Comparison of Fracture Strength and Fluoride Releasing Properties of New Alkasite Materials with Conventional Restorative Material, Bulk Fill Composite and Glass Ionomer Cement: An In-Vitro Study |
| title_fullStr | Evaluation and Comparison of Fracture Strength and Fluoride Releasing Properties of New Alkasite Materials with Conventional Restorative Material, Bulk Fill Composite and Glass Ionomer Cement: An In-Vitro Study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation and Comparison of Fracture Strength and Fluoride Releasing Properties of New Alkasite Materials with Conventional Restorative Material, Bulk Fill Composite and Glass Ionomer Cement: An In-Vitro Study |
| title_short | Evaluation and Comparison of Fracture Strength and Fluoride Releasing Properties of New Alkasite Materials with Conventional Restorative Material, Bulk Fill Composite and Glass Ionomer Cement: An In-Vitro Study |
| title_sort | evaluation and comparison of fracture strength and fluoride releasing properties of new alkasite materials with conventional restorative material bulk fill composite and glass ionomer cement an in vitro study |
| topic | cention-n fluoride ion glass-ionomer cement ph change |
| url | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_222_24 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT savankkashiyani evaluationandcomparisonoffracturestrengthandfluoridereleasingpropertiesofnewalkasitematerialswithconventionalrestorativematerialbulkfillcompositeandglassionomercementaninvitrostudy AT shreyaakhanna evaluationandcomparisonoffracturestrengthandfluoridereleasingpropertiesofnewalkasitematerialswithconventionalrestorativematerialbulkfillcompositeandglassionomercementaninvitrostudy AT leenajobanputra evaluationandcomparisonoffracturestrengthandfluoridereleasingpropertiesofnewalkasitematerialswithconventionalrestorativematerialbulkfillcompositeandglassionomercementaninvitrostudy AT niharikapatel evaluationandcomparisonoffracturestrengthandfluoridereleasingpropertiesofnewalkasitematerialswithconventionalrestorativematerialbulkfillcompositeandglassionomercementaninvitrostudy AT hirenkumarppatel evaluationandcomparisonoffracturestrengthandfluoridereleasingpropertiesofnewalkasitematerialswithconventionalrestorativematerialbulkfillcompositeandglassionomercementaninvitrostudy AT apoorvadpatel evaluationandcomparisonoffracturestrengthandfluoridereleasingpropertiesofnewalkasitematerialswithconventionalrestorativematerialbulkfillcompositeandglassionomercementaninvitrostudy |