Socioeconomic inequalities in patient-reported outcome measures among total hip and knee arthroplasty patients: a comprehensive analysis of instruments and domains

Abstract Background Prior to total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA), patients with low socioeconomic status (SES) report worse Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), persisting postoperatively. This study explores which self-reported PROMs and their specific domains are most involved. Methods...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joshua M. Bonsel, Max Reijman, Erin M. Macri, Jan A. N. Verhaar, Liza N. van Steenbergen, Gouke J. Bonsel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-05-01
Series:International Journal for Equity in Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02520-4
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850270807208493056
author Joshua M. Bonsel
Max Reijman
Erin M. Macri
Jan A. N. Verhaar
Liza N. van Steenbergen
Gouke J. Bonsel
author_facet Joshua M. Bonsel
Max Reijman
Erin M. Macri
Jan A. N. Verhaar
Liza N. van Steenbergen
Gouke J. Bonsel
author_sort Joshua M. Bonsel
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Prior to total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA), patients with low socioeconomic status (SES) report worse Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), persisting postoperatively. This study explores which self-reported PROMs and their specific domains are most involved. Methods We obtained data from the Dutch Arthroplasty Registry (2014–2022), including over 100,000 THA/TKA patients with complete preoperative and 12-month follow-up PROMs. The EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L, EQ Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Oxford Hip and Oxford Knee Score (OHS/OKS), and Numerical Rating Scales (NRS) for pain and satisfaction (TKA only, at 12-month follow-up) were obtained. The PROMs were transformed to a 0-100 scale for direct comparison. A SES-indicator based on neighborhood income, unemployment rate, and education level was divided into quintiles, which are equal groups representing 20% of the Dutch population, and was ranked from least to most deprived. Through linear regression we contrasted the most and least deprived groups, adjusting for patient and surgical characteristics. The contribution (percentage) of each domain to the overall health inequalities was estimated for the EQ-5D’s and the OHS/OKS. Results In TKA patients, the most compared to the least deprived group had a lower preoperative EQ-5D-3L score: -2.1 [95% confidence interval − 2.6, -1.6], p < 0.001. At 12-month follow-up, the difference was smaller: EQ-5D-3L 1.3 [-1.9, -0.7], p < 0.001. A larger difference between the most and least deprived was present in OKS (preoperatively: -4.3 [-5.3, -3.4], p < 0.001; 12-month: -1.8 [-2.5, -1.2], p < 0.001). The difference in EQ VAS was smaller (preoperatively: -0.8 [-1.5, -0.1], p = 0.024; 12-month: -0.5 [-1.2, 0.1], p = 0.108). The difference in NRS pain (in rest) was comparable to those in EQ-5D-3L and OKS (preoperatively: -4.5 [-5.4, -3.5], p < 0.001; 12-month: -2.7 [-3.5, -1.9], p < 0.001), while no difference between the most and least deprived in NRS satisfaction was observed at 12 months. For EQ-5D-3L, the domain usual activities accounted for up to 46% of the difference between SES groups, while anxiety/depression played a limited role (up to 17%). For OHS/OKS, functioning contributed most in THA (up to 61%) and pain contributed most in TKA (up to 68%). Differences in PROM scores between SES groups, and how these differences compared across PROMs, were similar in THA patients. Overall, the EQ-5D-5L produced similar patterns compared to the EQ-5D-3L. Conclusions Deprived THA/TKA patients have poorer pre- and postoperative health, which was primarily related to worse functioning and pain; the clinical relevance of these differences remain uncertain. These differences did not translate into worse overall health (EQ VAS) or into higher dissatisfaction among deprived patients. Future research should investigate whether the EQ VAS and satisfaction measure reflected health differences between SES groups or were biased by reporting heterogeneity, where respondents interpreted the wording differently.
format Article
id doaj-art-91f8d1c33a5c49babf52839e6eecd11c
institution OA Journals
issn 1475-9276
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series International Journal for Equity in Health
spelling doaj-art-91f8d1c33a5c49babf52839e6eecd11c2025-08-20T01:52:25ZengBMCInternational Journal for Equity in Health1475-92762025-05-0124111310.1186/s12939-025-02520-4Socioeconomic inequalities in patient-reported outcome measures among total hip and knee arthroplasty patients: a comprehensive analysis of instruments and domainsJoshua M. Bonsel0Max Reijman1Erin M. Macri2Jan A. N. Verhaar3Liza N. van Steenbergen4Gouke J. Bonsel5Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus MCDepartment of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus MCDepartment of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus MCDepartment of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus MCDutch Arthroplasty Register (Landelijke Registratie Orthopedische Interventies)EuroQol Research FoundationAbstract Background Prior to total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA), patients with low socioeconomic status (SES) report worse Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), persisting postoperatively. This study explores which self-reported PROMs and their specific domains are most involved. Methods We obtained data from the Dutch Arthroplasty Registry (2014–2022), including over 100,000 THA/TKA patients with complete preoperative and 12-month follow-up PROMs. The EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L, EQ Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Oxford Hip and Oxford Knee Score (OHS/OKS), and Numerical Rating Scales (NRS) for pain and satisfaction (TKA only, at 12-month follow-up) were obtained. The PROMs were transformed to a 0-100 scale for direct comparison. A SES-indicator based on neighborhood income, unemployment rate, and education level was divided into quintiles, which are equal groups representing 20% of the Dutch population, and was ranked from least to most deprived. Through linear regression we contrasted the most and least deprived groups, adjusting for patient and surgical characteristics. The contribution (percentage) of each domain to the overall health inequalities was estimated for the EQ-5D’s and the OHS/OKS. Results In TKA patients, the most compared to the least deprived group had a lower preoperative EQ-5D-3L score: -2.1 [95% confidence interval − 2.6, -1.6], p < 0.001. At 12-month follow-up, the difference was smaller: EQ-5D-3L 1.3 [-1.9, -0.7], p < 0.001. A larger difference between the most and least deprived was present in OKS (preoperatively: -4.3 [-5.3, -3.4], p < 0.001; 12-month: -1.8 [-2.5, -1.2], p < 0.001). The difference in EQ VAS was smaller (preoperatively: -0.8 [-1.5, -0.1], p = 0.024; 12-month: -0.5 [-1.2, 0.1], p = 0.108). The difference in NRS pain (in rest) was comparable to those in EQ-5D-3L and OKS (preoperatively: -4.5 [-5.4, -3.5], p < 0.001; 12-month: -2.7 [-3.5, -1.9], p < 0.001), while no difference between the most and least deprived in NRS satisfaction was observed at 12 months. For EQ-5D-3L, the domain usual activities accounted for up to 46% of the difference between SES groups, while anxiety/depression played a limited role (up to 17%). For OHS/OKS, functioning contributed most in THA (up to 61%) and pain contributed most in TKA (up to 68%). Differences in PROM scores between SES groups, and how these differences compared across PROMs, were similar in THA patients. Overall, the EQ-5D-5L produced similar patterns compared to the EQ-5D-3L. Conclusions Deprived THA/TKA patients have poorer pre- and postoperative health, which was primarily related to worse functioning and pain; the clinical relevance of these differences remain uncertain. These differences did not translate into worse overall health (EQ VAS) or into higher dissatisfaction among deprived patients. Future research should investigate whether the EQ VAS and satisfaction measure reflected health differences between SES groups or were biased by reporting heterogeneity, where respondents interpreted the wording differently.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02520-4Total hip arthroplastyTotal knee arthroplastySocioeconomic statusInequalityPatient-reported outcomeReporting heterogeneity
spellingShingle Joshua M. Bonsel
Max Reijman
Erin M. Macri
Jan A. N. Verhaar
Liza N. van Steenbergen
Gouke J. Bonsel
Socioeconomic inequalities in patient-reported outcome measures among total hip and knee arthroplasty patients: a comprehensive analysis of instruments and domains
International Journal for Equity in Health
Total hip arthroplasty
Total knee arthroplasty
Socioeconomic status
Inequality
Patient-reported outcome
Reporting heterogeneity
title Socioeconomic inequalities in patient-reported outcome measures among total hip and knee arthroplasty patients: a comprehensive analysis of instruments and domains
title_full Socioeconomic inequalities in patient-reported outcome measures among total hip and knee arthroplasty patients: a comprehensive analysis of instruments and domains
title_fullStr Socioeconomic inequalities in patient-reported outcome measures among total hip and knee arthroplasty patients: a comprehensive analysis of instruments and domains
title_full_unstemmed Socioeconomic inequalities in patient-reported outcome measures among total hip and knee arthroplasty patients: a comprehensive analysis of instruments and domains
title_short Socioeconomic inequalities in patient-reported outcome measures among total hip and knee arthroplasty patients: a comprehensive analysis of instruments and domains
title_sort socioeconomic inequalities in patient reported outcome measures among total hip and knee arthroplasty patients a comprehensive analysis of instruments and domains
topic Total hip arthroplasty
Total knee arthroplasty
Socioeconomic status
Inequality
Patient-reported outcome
Reporting heterogeneity
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02520-4
work_keys_str_mv AT joshuambonsel socioeconomicinequalitiesinpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresamongtotalhipandkneearthroplastypatientsacomprehensiveanalysisofinstrumentsanddomains
AT maxreijman socioeconomicinequalitiesinpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresamongtotalhipandkneearthroplastypatientsacomprehensiveanalysisofinstrumentsanddomains
AT erinmmacri socioeconomicinequalitiesinpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresamongtotalhipandkneearthroplastypatientsacomprehensiveanalysisofinstrumentsanddomains
AT jananverhaar socioeconomicinequalitiesinpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresamongtotalhipandkneearthroplastypatientsacomprehensiveanalysisofinstrumentsanddomains
AT lizanvansteenbergen socioeconomicinequalitiesinpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresamongtotalhipandkneearthroplastypatientsacomprehensiveanalysisofinstrumentsanddomains
AT goukejbonsel socioeconomicinequalitiesinpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresamongtotalhipandkneearthroplastypatientsacomprehensiveanalysisofinstrumentsanddomains