The Thing That Should (Not) Be: On André J. Abath’s Ways of Knowing

Abstract In "Knowing What Things Are", A. Abath’s account of knowledge has two main features. Firstly, it is inquiry-based or erotetic: knowledge is to be understood in terms of answers to questions of the form “What is x?” Secondly, it is contextualist: answers to questions of the form “w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: LEONARDO DE MELLO RIBEIRO
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Estadual de Campinas 2025-04-01
Series:Manuscrito
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452025000200405&lng=en&tlng=en
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850215103319769088
author LEONARDO DE MELLO RIBEIRO
author_facet LEONARDO DE MELLO RIBEIRO
author_sort LEONARDO DE MELLO RIBEIRO
collection DOAJ
description Abstract In "Knowing What Things Are", A. Abath’s account of knowledge has two main features. Firstly, it is inquiry-based or erotetic: knowledge is to be understood in terms of answers to questions of the form “What is x?” Secondly, it is contextualist: answers to questions of the form “what is x?” are dependent on contextual factors, as they should be evaluated as true and satisfactory given the specific purposes (or goals) of an inquiry. Here I focus on the contextualist component of Abath's account. I argue that there is a tension between the descriptive account Abath advocates in chapters 1-5 and the normative account developed in chapters 6-7. I argue, in particular, that Abath's contextualism faces trouble when applied to knowledge of strongly social kinds and moral/political obligations, which are inherently normative.
format Article
id doaj-art-91f61937c66a4401983cf2ea488f81fe
institution OA Journals
issn 2317-630X
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Universidade Estadual de Campinas
record_format Article
series Manuscrito
spelling doaj-art-91f61937c66a4401983cf2ea488f81fe2025-08-20T02:08:43ZengUniversidade Estadual de CampinasManuscrito2317-630X2025-04-0148210.1590/0100-6045.2025.v48n2.lrThe Thing That Should (Not) Be: On André J. Abath’s Ways of KnowingLEONARDO DE MELLO RIBEIROhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5912-2921Abstract In "Knowing What Things Are", A. Abath’s account of knowledge has two main features. Firstly, it is inquiry-based or erotetic: knowledge is to be understood in terms of answers to questions of the form “What is x?” Secondly, it is contextualist: answers to questions of the form “what is x?” are dependent on contextual factors, as they should be evaluated as true and satisfactory given the specific purposes (or goals) of an inquiry. Here I focus on the contextualist component of Abath's account. I argue that there is a tension between the descriptive account Abath advocates in chapters 1-5 and the normative account developed in chapters 6-7. I argue, in particular, that Abath's contextualism faces trouble when applied to knowledge of strongly social kinds and moral/political obligations, which are inherently normative.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452025000200405&lng=en&tlng=enA. J. AbathContextualismErotetic amelioration
spellingShingle LEONARDO DE MELLO RIBEIRO
The Thing That Should (Not) Be: On André J. Abath’s Ways of Knowing
Manuscrito
A. J. Abath
Contextualism
Erotetic amelioration
title The Thing That Should (Not) Be: On André J. Abath’s Ways of Knowing
title_full The Thing That Should (Not) Be: On André J. Abath’s Ways of Knowing
title_fullStr The Thing That Should (Not) Be: On André J. Abath’s Ways of Knowing
title_full_unstemmed The Thing That Should (Not) Be: On André J. Abath’s Ways of Knowing
title_short The Thing That Should (Not) Be: On André J. Abath’s Ways of Knowing
title_sort thing that should not be on andre j abath s ways of knowing
topic A. J. Abath
Contextualism
Erotetic amelioration
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452025000200405&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT leonardodemelloribeiro thethingthatshouldnotbeonandrejabathswaysofknowing
AT leonardodemelloribeiro thingthatshouldnotbeonandrejabathswaysofknowing