Determining the Effectiveness of <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> as a Postbiotic in Mass-Reared <i>Acheta domesticus</i> (House Cricket)
Pre-, pro-, and post-biotics have been used with success in several commercially grown insect species to increase yields and improve health outcomes. However, few studies have been published evaluating the use of nutritional supplements in <i>Acheta domesticus</i>. For this study, we fed...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-07-01
|
| Series: | Insects |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/16/7/702 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Pre-, pro-, and post-biotics have been used with success in several commercially grown insect species to increase yields and improve health outcomes. However, few studies have been published evaluating the use of nutritional supplements in <i>Acheta domesticus</i>. For this study, we fed day-old, farm-raised, <i>A. domesticus</i> a <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> postbiotic product at one of three different inclusion rates (0, 0.25, and 0.5%) for 32 days. Crickets were analyzed for differences in average weights, total biomass, percent survival, nutritional analyses, viral qPCR, and 16S/18S microbiomes. Crickets receiving the 0.5% inclusion feed trended towards having a higher total biomass (F = 3.823, <i>p</i> = 0.052) and a higher percent survival per bin (F = 3.667, <i>p</i> = 0.057) than the crickets receiving lower inclusion feeds. No significant differences were found in viral prevalences or loads. Significant changes to the microbiomes were mostly defined by increased abundances of presumed beneficial bacteria (<i>Akkermansia</i>, <i>Catenibacillus</i>, and <i>Odoribacter</i>) in the groups receiving postbiotics rather than by losses of harmful bacteria. For the 18S results, there was an increased abundance of a Gregarian apicomplexan, <i>Leidyana erratica</i> in the treatment groups. Overall, the 0.5% inclusion feed appeared to be beneficial and further study investigating other forms of feed additives is warranted. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2075-4450 |