Value of Peak Expiratory Flow Rate in Evaluating Cough Ability in Patients Undergoing Lung Surgery

Introduction. Postoperative ineffective cough is easy to occur after thoracic surgery, and it is also a risk factor for postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). Objectives. To explore the value of peak expiratory flow rate (PEF) in evaluating cough ability in patients undergoing lung surgery an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gui-Xian Liu, Jian-Hua Su, Xin Wang, Jin-Tao He
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:Canadian Respiratory Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5888783
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832546001985994752
author Gui-Xian Liu
Jian-Hua Su
Xin Wang
Jin-Tao He
author_facet Gui-Xian Liu
Jian-Hua Su
Xin Wang
Jin-Tao He
author_sort Gui-Xian Liu
collection DOAJ
description Introduction. Postoperative ineffective cough is easy to occur after thoracic surgery, and it is also a risk factor for postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). Objectives. To explore the value of peak expiratory flow rate (PEF) in evaluating cough ability in patients undergoing lung surgery and evaluate the effectiveness of chest wall compression during the expiratory phase by PEF. Methods. From September 2020 to May 2021, the researchers collected the data of patients who underwent lung surgery. Eventually, 153 patients who met the criteria were included, 102 cases were included in the effective cough group and 51 cases were included in the ineffective cough group. The receiver working curve (ROC curve) was used to analyze whether PEF could evaluate cough ability. At the same time, the researchers collected the pulmonary function data of the first 30 patients of the ineffective cough group while compressing the chest wall during the expiratory phase to evaluate the effectiveness of chest wall compression. Results. The area under the curve (AUC) of postoperative PEF to evaluate the postoperative cough ability was 0.955 (95% CI: 0.927–0.983, P<0.001). The values of PEF (127.17 ± 34.72 L/min vs. 100.70 ± 29.98 L/min, P<0.001, 95% CI: 18.34–34.59) and FEV1 (0.72 (0.68–0.97) L vs. 0.64 (0.56–0.82) L, P<0.001) measured while compressing the chest wall were higher than those without compression. Conclusions. PEF can be used as a quantitative indicator of cough ability. Chest wall compression could improve cough ability for patients who have ineffective cough.
format Article
id doaj-art-91ad264fc77648bab21b28322ba45e58
institution Kabale University
issn 1916-7245
language English
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Canadian Respiratory Journal
spelling doaj-art-91ad264fc77648bab21b28322ba45e582025-02-03T07:24:15ZengWileyCanadian Respiratory Journal1916-72452021-01-01202110.1155/2021/5888783Value of Peak Expiratory Flow Rate in Evaluating Cough Ability in Patients Undergoing Lung SurgeryGui-Xian Liu0Jian-Hua Su1Xin Wang2Jin-Tao He3Southwest Medical UniversityDepartment of RehabilitationDepartment of Thoracic SurgerySouthwest Medical UniversityIntroduction. Postoperative ineffective cough is easy to occur after thoracic surgery, and it is also a risk factor for postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). Objectives. To explore the value of peak expiratory flow rate (PEF) in evaluating cough ability in patients undergoing lung surgery and evaluate the effectiveness of chest wall compression during the expiratory phase by PEF. Methods. From September 2020 to May 2021, the researchers collected the data of patients who underwent lung surgery. Eventually, 153 patients who met the criteria were included, 102 cases were included in the effective cough group and 51 cases were included in the ineffective cough group. The receiver working curve (ROC curve) was used to analyze whether PEF could evaluate cough ability. At the same time, the researchers collected the pulmonary function data of the first 30 patients of the ineffective cough group while compressing the chest wall during the expiratory phase to evaluate the effectiveness of chest wall compression. Results. The area under the curve (AUC) of postoperative PEF to evaluate the postoperative cough ability was 0.955 (95% CI: 0.927–0.983, P<0.001). The values of PEF (127.17 ± 34.72 L/min vs. 100.70 ± 29.98 L/min, P<0.001, 95% CI: 18.34–34.59) and FEV1 (0.72 (0.68–0.97) L vs. 0.64 (0.56–0.82) L, P<0.001) measured while compressing the chest wall were higher than those without compression. Conclusions. PEF can be used as a quantitative indicator of cough ability. Chest wall compression could improve cough ability for patients who have ineffective cough.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5888783
spellingShingle Gui-Xian Liu
Jian-Hua Su
Xin Wang
Jin-Tao He
Value of Peak Expiratory Flow Rate in Evaluating Cough Ability in Patients Undergoing Lung Surgery
Canadian Respiratory Journal
title Value of Peak Expiratory Flow Rate in Evaluating Cough Ability in Patients Undergoing Lung Surgery
title_full Value of Peak Expiratory Flow Rate in Evaluating Cough Ability in Patients Undergoing Lung Surgery
title_fullStr Value of Peak Expiratory Flow Rate in Evaluating Cough Ability in Patients Undergoing Lung Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Value of Peak Expiratory Flow Rate in Evaluating Cough Ability in Patients Undergoing Lung Surgery
title_short Value of Peak Expiratory Flow Rate in Evaluating Cough Ability in Patients Undergoing Lung Surgery
title_sort value of peak expiratory flow rate in evaluating cough ability in patients undergoing lung surgery
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5888783
work_keys_str_mv AT guixianliu valueofpeakexpiratoryflowrateinevaluatingcoughabilityinpatientsundergoinglungsurgery
AT jianhuasu valueofpeakexpiratoryflowrateinevaluatingcoughabilityinpatientsundergoinglungsurgery
AT xinwang valueofpeakexpiratoryflowrateinevaluatingcoughabilityinpatientsundergoinglungsurgery
AT jintaohe valueofpeakexpiratoryflowrateinevaluatingcoughabilityinpatientsundergoinglungsurgery