William Dunbar and the Querelle des Femmes: A Response to the Roman de la Rose
This paper examines two established works by the Scottish poet William Dunbar (c. 1460-1513) which appear in the 1568 Bannatyne manuscript: “The Golden Targe” and “Sen that I am Presoneir” (also known as “Beauty and the Prisoner”).1 Rather than simply rereading the familiar steps of the debate, I ar...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Institut du Monde Anglophone
2019-02-01
|
| Series: | Etudes Epistémè |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/episteme/2907 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | This paper examines two established works by the Scottish poet William Dunbar (c. 1460-1513) which appear in the 1568 Bannatyne manuscript: “The Golden Targe” and “Sen that I am Presoneir” (also known as “Beauty and the Prisoner”).1 Rather than simply rereading the familiar steps of the debate, I argue that Dunbar exploits his mastery of genre and style in order to subvert the usual terms of the querelle debate and reignite discourse in a Scottish context. In particular, Dunbar’s use of language is analysed, in terms of its appeal to the senses in his construction of gender. Ultimately I suggest that rather than two distinctly separate and stylistically opposed poems, one can read the “Targe” and “Presoneir” as a pair of cognate poems, a stylistic parallel to the disjointed dual authorship of the “Rose. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1634-0450 |