Comparative Evaluation of Susceptibility Results from the Liofilchem Antifungal Multodiscs and the VITEK® 2 Susceptibility Tests for Candida Species Causing Bloodstream Infections at the University Hospital of the West Indies

Introduction: Determination of local Candida species susceptibility profiles is imperative in establishing empiric guidelines for candidemia, given the associated high mortality rates. Whilst broth dilution methods (eg. microdilution) are considered the “gold standard” reference technique, they prov...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mrs Rochelle Charvis, Dr Glendee Reynolds Campbell, Dr Neil McKnight, Mrs. Alrica Bruce-Mowatt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-03-01
Series:International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971224006052
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850043298722349056
author Mrs Rochelle Charvis
Dr Glendee Reynolds Campbell
Dr Neil McKnight
Mrs. Alrica Bruce-Mowatt
author_facet Mrs Rochelle Charvis
Dr Glendee Reynolds Campbell
Dr Neil McKnight
Mrs. Alrica Bruce-Mowatt
author_sort Mrs Rochelle Charvis
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Determination of local Candida species susceptibility profiles is imperative in establishing empiric guidelines for candidemia, given the associated high mortality rates. Whilst broth dilution methods (eg. microdilution) are considered the “gold standard” reference technique, they prove time-consuming as routine tests in clinical diagnostic laboratories. Less laborious techniques include the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method, which is approved by the CLSI solely for testing azoles and echinocandins. The VITEK® 2 (bioMėrieux, Durham, NC), another alternative, is an automated system that utilizes the microdilution principle which allows for MIC interpretation using CLSI breakpoints. This study aimed to determine the agreement between the VITEK® 2 and the Liofilchem (Waltham, MA) antifungal disk diffusion methods for susceptibility of candidemia species, isolated between March 2020 and February 2021 at The University Hospital of the West Indies. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study using a census method to collate relevant data from the Laboratory Information System (LIS) was conducted. The candidemia isolates obtained were identified and speciated using the MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry (Bruker MS®, Billerica, MA). Antifungal susceptibility testing was done using Liofilchem Antifungal Multodiscs and the VITEK® 2 automated AST-YS08 cards. Comparative analysis was conducted only on antifungal agents for which CLSI breakpoints existed for both methods. Results: Candida species were isolated from 38 of the 7853 blood culture samples processed during the period (0.5% prevalence). Candida albicans, the most frequently isolated species, accounted for 36.8% (n=14), and non-albicans Candida species accounted for 63.2% (n=24). Susceptibility rates for each antifungal tested using Liofilchem Multodiscs and VITEK® 2 were respectively: Caspofungin; 100% versus 94.7%, Voriconazole; 94.7% versus 97.4% and Fluconazole; 89.5% versus 100%. Discussion: Categorical agreements were excellent for caspofungin, voriconazole and fluconazole. The variability in comparative susceptibilities for fluconazole can be attributed to four of the Candida albicans isolates. Minor discrepancies were detected with one isolate of Candida albicans to voriconazole. The caspofungin susceptibilities of the two Candida dubliniensis isolates, and the fluconazole susceptibilities for the two Candida glabrata isolates, could not be compared between the two methods as the VITEK® 2 did not establish MICs for these isolates. These deficiencies should be considered during the clinical use of these drugs to treat those Candida species. Although amphotericin B and flucytosine were tested with both methods, the lack of CLSI breakpoints for the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method did not allow for their inclusion in the comparative analysis. Conclusion: The Liofilchem Antifungal Multodisc can be used as an alternative guide for therapeutic decisions for antifungals approved by CLSI. Caution however should be taken when reporting caspofungin for Candida dubliniensis, fluconazole for Candida glabrata and fluconazole-resistant Candida albicans isolates.
format Article
id doaj-art-9169e29436b843f593eea40c7d013ec7
institution DOAJ
issn 1201-9712
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series International Journal of Infectious Diseases
spelling doaj-art-9169e29436b843f593eea40c7d013ec72025-08-20T02:55:16ZengElsevierInternational Journal of Infectious Diseases1201-97122025-03-0115210753010.1016/j.ijid.2024.107530Comparative Evaluation of Susceptibility Results from the Liofilchem Antifungal Multodiscs and the VITEK® 2 Susceptibility Tests for Candida Species Causing Bloodstream Infections at the University Hospital of the West IndiesMrs Rochelle Charvis0Dr Glendee Reynolds Campbell1Dr Neil McKnight2Mrs. Alrica Bruce-Mowatt3University Of The West IndiesUniversity Of The West IndiesUniversity Of The West IndiesUniversity Of The West IndiesIntroduction: Determination of local Candida species susceptibility profiles is imperative in establishing empiric guidelines for candidemia, given the associated high mortality rates. Whilst broth dilution methods (eg. microdilution) are considered the “gold standard” reference technique, they prove time-consuming as routine tests in clinical diagnostic laboratories. Less laborious techniques include the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method, which is approved by the CLSI solely for testing azoles and echinocandins. The VITEK® 2 (bioMėrieux, Durham, NC), another alternative, is an automated system that utilizes the microdilution principle which allows for MIC interpretation using CLSI breakpoints. This study aimed to determine the agreement between the VITEK® 2 and the Liofilchem (Waltham, MA) antifungal disk diffusion methods for susceptibility of candidemia species, isolated between March 2020 and February 2021 at The University Hospital of the West Indies. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study using a census method to collate relevant data from the Laboratory Information System (LIS) was conducted. The candidemia isolates obtained were identified and speciated using the MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry (Bruker MS®, Billerica, MA). Antifungal susceptibility testing was done using Liofilchem Antifungal Multodiscs and the VITEK® 2 automated AST-YS08 cards. Comparative analysis was conducted only on antifungal agents for which CLSI breakpoints existed for both methods. Results: Candida species were isolated from 38 of the 7853 blood culture samples processed during the period (0.5% prevalence). Candida albicans, the most frequently isolated species, accounted for 36.8% (n=14), and non-albicans Candida species accounted for 63.2% (n=24). Susceptibility rates for each antifungal tested using Liofilchem Multodiscs and VITEK® 2 were respectively: Caspofungin; 100% versus 94.7%, Voriconazole; 94.7% versus 97.4% and Fluconazole; 89.5% versus 100%. Discussion: Categorical agreements were excellent for caspofungin, voriconazole and fluconazole. The variability in comparative susceptibilities for fluconazole can be attributed to four of the Candida albicans isolates. Minor discrepancies were detected with one isolate of Candida albicans to voriconazole. The caspofungin susceptibilities of the two Candida dubliniensis isolates, and the fluconazole susceptibilities for the two Candida glabrata isolates, could not be compared between the two methods as the VITEK® 2 did not establish MICs for these isolates. These deficiencies should be considered during the clinical use of these drugs to treat those Candida species. Although amphotericin B and flucytosine were tested with both methods, the lack of CLSI breakpoints for the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method did not allow for their inclusion in the comparative analysis. Conclusion: The Liofilchem Antifungal Multodisc can be used as an alternative guide for therapeutic decisions for antifungals approved by CLSI. Caution however should be taken when reporting caspofungin for Candida dubliniensis, fluconazole for Candida glabrata and fluconazole-resistant Candida albicans isolates.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971224006052
spellingShingle Mrs Rochelle Charvis
Dr Glendee Reynolds Campbell
Dr Neil McKnight
Mrs. Alrica Bruce-Mowatt
Comparative Evaluation of Susceptibility Results from the Liofilchem Antifungal Multodiscs and the VITEK® 2 Susceptibility Tests for Candida Species Causing Bloodstream Infections at the University Hospital of the West Indies
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
title Comparative Evaluation of Susceptibility Results from the Liofilchem Antifungal Multodiscs and the VITEK® 2 Susceptibility Tests for Candida Species Causing Bloodstream Infections at the University Hospital of the West Indies
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Susceptibility Results from the Liofilchem Antifungal Multodiscs and the VITEK® 2 Susceptibility Tests for Candida Species Causing Bloodstream Infections at the University Hospital of the West Indies
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Susceptibility Results from the Liofilchem Antifungal Multodiscs and the VITEK® 2 Susceptibility Tests for Candida Species Causing Bloodstream Infections at the University Hospital of the West Indies
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Susceptibility Results from the Liofilchem Antifungal Multodiscs and the VITEK® 2 Susceptibility Tests for Candida Species Causing Bloodstream Infections at the University Hospital of the West Indies
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Susceptibility Results from the Liofilchem Antifungal Multodiscs and the VITEK® 2 Susceptibility Tests for Candida Species Causing Bloodstream Infections at the University Hospital of the West Indies
title_sort comparative evaluation of susceptibility results from the liofilchem antifungal multodiscs and the vitek r 2 susceptibility tests for candida species causing bloodstream infections at the university hospital of the west indies
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971224006052
work_keys_str_mv AT mrsrochellecharvis comparativeevaluationofsusceptibilityresultsfromtheliofilchemantifungalmultodiscsandthevitek2susceptibilitytestsforcandidaspeciescausingbloodstreaminfectionsattheuniversityhospitalofthewestindies
AT drglendeereynoldscampbell comparativeevaluationofsusceptibilityresultsfromtheliofilchemantifungalmultodiscsandthevitek2susceptibilitytestsforcandidaspeciescausingbloodstreaminfectionsattheuniversityhospitalofthewestindies
AT drneilmcknight comparativeevaluationofsusceptibilityresultsfromtheliofilchemantifungalmultodiscsandthevitek2susceptibilitytestsforcandidaspeciescausingbloodstreaminfectionsattheuniversityhospitalofthewestindies
AT mrsalricabrucemowatt comparativeevaluationofsusceptibilityresultsfromtheliofilchemantifungalmultodiscsandthevitek2susceptibilitytestsforcandidaspeciescausingbloodstreaminfectionsattheuniversityhospitalofthewestindies