Theoretical disagreement about law
As the dominant direction of the study of legal phenomena, legal positivism has suffered criticisms above all from representatives of natural law. Nevertheless, the most complex criticism of legal positivism came from Ronald Dworkin. With the methodological criticism he formed in 'Law's Em...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Zdravković Miloš |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Law, Belgrade, Serbia
2014-01-01
|
| Series: | Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0003-2565/2014/0003-25651403087Z.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Can there be a plural acceptance of the rule of recognition? Notes on Kevin Toh’s expressivist analysis of Hart’s internal legal statements
by: Rodrigo Dornas de Oliveira, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01) -
Taking salience seriously: the viability of Ronald Dworkin’s theory of salience in the context of extra-territorial corporate accountability
by: David Brian Dennison
Published: (2015-03-01) -
Coordination of contexts and taste disagreements
by: David Bordonaba Plou
Published: (2020-03-01) -
What are Deep Disagreements?
by: gustavo javier arroyo
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Sociology of law: Introduction and main theoretical approaches
by: Mariana Sánchez Busso
Published: (2023-04-01)