Steady-State Analysis and Comparison of Control Strategies for PMSM
Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor (PMSM) has been considered as the best choice for numerous applications. To make PMSM a high performance drive, effective control system is required. Vector control is accepted widely due to its decoupling effect but it is not the only performance requirement. Addi...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2015-01-01
|
| Series: | Modelling and Simulation in Engineering |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/306787 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849692998072270848 |
|---|---|
| author | Jyoti Agrawal Sanjay Bodkhe |
| author_facet | Jyoti Agrawal Sanjay Bodkhe |
| author_sort | Jyoti Agrawal |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor (PMSM) has been considered as the best choice for numerous applications. To make PMSM a high performance drive, effective control system is required. Vector control is accepted widely due to its decoupling effect but it is not the only performance requirement. Additional control methods such as constant torque angle control (CTAC), optimum torque per ampere control (OTPAC), unity power factor control (UPFC), constant mutual flux linkages control (CMFLC), and angle control of air gap flux and current phasor (ACAGF) can also be implemented. This paper therefore presents some important control strategies for PMSM along with merits and limitations which provide a wide variety of control choices in many applications. The performance characteristics for each strategy under steady state are modelled and simulated in MATLAB environment. Based on the simulation results, a conclusion is drawn that OTPAC is superior in normalized torque per unit normalized stator current (Ten/isn) ratio whereas UPFC yields very low Ten/isn ratio. In addition, performances of these control strategies are compared, which is a key to select optimum strategy depending on requirements. Based on the comparative study, it can be concluded that CMFLC is superior to CTAC, ACAGF, OTPAC, and UPFC. Hence, it can be a good control strategy to consider. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-9124d1b681bf4fdbba3b862ef719e9b9 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 1687-5591 1687-5605 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2015-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Modelling and Simulation in Engineering |
| spelling | doaj-art-9124d1b681bf4fdbba3b862ef719e9b92025-08-20T03:20:33ZengWileyModelling and Simulation in Engineering1687-55911687-56052015-01-01201510.1155/2015/306787306787Steady-State Analysis and Comparison of Control Strategies for PMSMJyoti Agrawal0Sanjay Bodkhe1Department of Electrical Engineering, G. H. Raisoni College of Engineering, CRPF Gate No. 3, Hingna Road, Digdoh Hills, Nagpur, Maharashtra 440016, IndiaDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Shri Ramdeobaba College of Engineering & Management, 601/K Choti Dhantoli, Nagpur, Maharashtra 440012, IndiaPermanent Magnet Synchronous Motor (PMSM) has been considered as the best choice for numerous applications. To make PMSM a high performance drive, effective control system is required. Vector control is accepted widely due to its decoupling effect but it is not the only performance requirement. Additional control methods such as constant torque angle control (CTAC), optimum torque per ampere control (OTPAC), unity power factor control (UPFC), constant mutual flux linkages control (CMFLC), and angle control of air gap flux and current phasor (ACAGF) can also be implemented. This paper therefore presents some important control strategies for PMSM along with merits and limitations which provide a wide variety of control choices in many applications. The performance characteristics for each strategy under steady state are modelled and simulated in MATLAB environment. Based on the simulation results, a conclusion is drawn that OTPAC is superior in normalized torque per unit normalized stator current (Ten/isn) ratio whereas UPFC yields very low Ten/isn ratio. In addition, performances of these control strategies are compared, which is a key to select optimum strategy depending on requirements. Based on the comparative study, it can be concluded that CMFLC is superior to CTAC, ACAGF, OTPAC, and UPFC. Hence, it can be a good control strategy to consider.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/306787 |
| spellingShingle | Jyoti Agrawal Sanjay Bodkhe Steady-State Analysis and Comparison of Control Strategies for PMSM Modelling and Simulation in Engineering |
| title | Steady-State Analysis and Comparison of Control Strategies for PMSM |
| title_full | Steady-State Analysis and Comparison of Control Strategies for PMSM |
| title_fullStr | Steady-State Analysis and Comparison of Control Strategies for PMSM |
| title_full_unstemmed | Steady-State Analysis and Comparison of Control Strategies for PMSM |
| title_short | Steady-State Analysis and Comparison of Control Strategies for PMSM |
| title_sort | steady state analysis and comparison of control strategies for pmsm |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/306787 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jyotiagrawal steadystateanalysisandcomparisonofcontrolstrategiesforpmsm AT sanjaybodkhe steadystateanalysisandcomparisonofcontrolstrategiesforpmsm |