Identification of flood vulnerability areas using analytical hierarchy process techniques in the Wuseta watershed, Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia

Abstract Flooding, caused by the excessive accumulation of water on land, disrupts activities in floodplain regions, particularly during the rainy season. The main objective is to map Flood vulnerability areas and identify regions most vulnerable to flooding to inform effective flood management stra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arega Mulu, Samuel Berihun Kassa, Mindesilew Lakew Wossene, Sintayehu Adefris, Taye Minchil Meshesha
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-08-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-13822-6
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Flooding, caused by the excessive accumulation of water on land, disrupts activities in floodplain regions, particularly during the rainy season. The main objective is to map Flood vulnerability areas and identify regions most vulnerable to flooding to inform effective flood management strategies using an integrated approach that combines remote sensing, geographic information systems (GIS), and the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to assess Flood vulnerability in the Wuseta Watershed. The research was conducted in three phases: pre-fieldwork, fieldwork, and post-fieldwork. Key factors influencing Flood vulnerability such as drainage density, elevation, land use/land cover, and slope were hierarchically weighted to produce a Flood vulnerability map. Rainfall distribution was not considered as a contributing factor the Ethiopian Meteorological Agency has installed only one weather station in the study area, located in Wuseta watershed. As a result, the rainfall distribution is considered uniform throughout the watershed, making it unsuitable for flood susceptibility assessment. The Flood vulnerability map categorizes the watershed into five zones: very high (0.07 km2), high (4.65 km2), moderate (7.86 km2), slight (4.41 km2), and very slight (0.001 km2). The results show that the upstream, northern, northwestern, and northeastern areas of the watershed face slight to very slight Flood vulnerability, while the southern region is highly vulnerable to flooding. These findings provide valuable insights for policymakers and local communities, aiding in the development of targeted mitigation strategies and raising awareness of flood-prone areas. This study underscores the value of integrating geospatial technologies and multi-criteria decision analysis in flood risk assessment, particularly in data-scarce regions, to enhance disaster preparedness and climate resilience.
ISSN:2045-2322