A systematic review of agricultural projects’ contributions to women’s empowerment
Abstract This study systematically reviews the application of the project-level Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index (pro-WEAI) in impact evaluations. Using Harzing’s “Publish or Perish” software, 626 articles published between 2012 and 2024 were initially retrieved, which were narrowed down to...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2025-04-01
|
| Series: | npj Sustainable Agriculture |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s44264-025-00061-5 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Abstract This study systematically reviews the application of the project-level Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index (pro-WEAI) in impact evaluations. Using Harzing’s “Publish or Perish” software, 626 articles published between 2012 and 2024 were initially retrieved, which were narrowed down to eight for detailed review, using the PRISMA framework. Project outcomes were classified into four categories: negative, no impact, positive but non-significant, and positive and significant. Findings show that while many projects aimed to empower women, results varied. Some improved autonomy in income, group membership, asset ownership, and financial access. However, work balance and attitudes toward intimate partner violence had negative impacts, which were mainly linked to the absence of asset transfers, male backlash, and entrenched gender norms. Likewise, the projects involving men, providing assets, and offering skills training also fostered women’s empowerment. We recommend that gender-transformative approaches like integrating socio-technical innovations help address systemic inequalities and advance gender equality. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2731-9202 |