Deep plasma proteomics identifies and validates an eight-protein biomarker panel that separate benign from malignant tumors in ovarian cancer

Abstract Background Ovarian cancer has the highest mortality of all gynecological cancers and surgery is commonly used as final diagnostic. Available literature indicates that women with benign tumors could often be conservatively managed, but accurate molecular tests are needed for triaging when go...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mikaela Moskov, Julia Hedlund Lindberg, Maria Lycke, Emma Ivansson, Ulf Gyllensten, Karin Sundfeldt, Karin Stålberg, Stefan Enroth
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-06-01
Series:Communications Medicine
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-025-00945-0
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850102544337993728
author Mikaela Moskov
Julia Hedlund Lindberg
Maria Lycke
Emma Ivansson
Ulf Gyllensten
Karin Sundfeldt
Karin Stålberg
Stefan Enroth
author_facet Mikaela Moskov
Julia Hedlund Lindberg
Maria Lycke
Emma Ivansson
Ulf Gyllensten
Karin Sundfeldt
Karin Stålberg
Stefan Enroth
author_sort Mikaela Moskov
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Ovarian cancer has the highest mortality of all gynecological cancers and surgery is commonly used as final diagnostic. Available literature indicates that women with benign tumors could often be conservatively managed, but accurate molecular tests are needed for triaging when gold-standard imaging techniques are inconclusive or lacking. Methods Here, we analyzed 5416 plasma proteins in two independent cohorts (N1 = 171, N2 = 233) with women surgically diagnosed with benign or malignant tumors. Using one cohort as discovery, we compared protein levels of benign tumors with early stage (I–II), late stage (III–IV) or any stage (I–IV) ovarian cancer and trained risk-score reporting multivariate models including a fixed cut-off for malignancy. Associations and model performance was then evaluated in the replication cohort. Results We identify 327 biomarker associations, corresponding to 191 unique proteins, and replicate 326 (99.7%). By comparing the 191 proteins with their corresponding tumor gene expression we find that only 11% (21/191) have significant correlation. Through analyzes of protein-protein correlation networks, we find that 62 of the 191 proteins have high correlation with at least one other protein, suggesting that many of the associations are secondary effects. In the replication cohort, our model has areas under the curve (AUC = 0.96) corresponding to 97% sensitivity at 68% specificity. For early-stage tumors, we estimate the sensitivity to 91% at a specificity of 68% as compared to 85% and 54% for CA-125 alone. Conclusions Our results indicates that up to one third of benign cases can be identified by molecular measures thereby reducing the need for diagnostic surgery.
format Article
id doaj-art-90c5e1e5f05346ed811dfdc55f577ecf
institution DOAJ
issn 2730-664X
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Communications Medicine
spelling doaj-art-90c5e1e5f05346ed811dfdc55f577ecf2025-08-20T02:39:44ZengNature PortfolioCommunications Medicine2730-664X2025-06-015111210.1038/s43856-025-00945-0Deep plasma proteomics identifies and validates an eight-protein biomarker panel that separate benign from malignant tumors in ovarian cancerMikaela Moskov0Julia Hedlund Lindberg1Maria Lycke2Emma Ivansson3Ulf Gyllensten4Karin Sundfeldt5Karin Stålberg6Stefan Enroth7Department of Immunology, Genetics, and Pathology, Biomedical Center, SciLifeLab Uppsala, Uppsala UniversityDepartment of Immunology, Genetics, and Pathology, Biomedical Center, SciLifeLab Uppsala, Uppsala UniversityDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg UniversityDepartment of Immunology, Genetics, and Pathology, Biomedical Center, SciLifeLab Uppsala, Uppsala UniversityDepartment of Immunology, Genetics, and Pathology, Biomedical Center, SciLifeLab Uppsala, Uppsala UniversityDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg UniversityDepartment of Women’s and Children’s Health, Uppsala UniversityDepartment of Immunology, Genetics, and Pathology, Biomedical Center, SciLifeLab Uppsala, Uppsala UniversityAbstract Background Ovarian cancer has the highest mortality of all gynecological cancers and surgery is commonly used as final diagnostic. Available literature indicates that women with benign tumors could often be conservatively managed, but accurate molecular tests are needed for triaging when gold-standard imaging techniques are inconclusive or lacking. Methods Here, we analyzed 5416 plasma proteins in two independent cohorts (N1 = 171, N2 = 233) with women surgically diagnosed with benign or malignant tumors. Using one cohort as discovery, we compared protein levels of benign tumors with early stage (I–II), late stage (III–IV) or any stage (I–IV) ovarian cancer and trained risk-score reporting multivariate models including a fixed cut-off for malignancy. Associations and model performance was then evaluated in the replication cohort. Results We identify 327 biomarker associations, corresponding to 191 unique proteins, and replicate 326 (99.7%). By comparing the 191 proteins with their corresponding tumor gene expression we find that only 11% (21/191) have significant correlation. Through analyzes of protein-protein correlation networks, we find that 62 of the 191 proteins have high correlation with at least one other protein, suggesting that many of the associations are secondary effects. In the replication cohort, our model has areas under the curve (AUC = 0.96) corresponding to 97% sensitivity at 68% specificity. For early-stage tumors, we estimate the sensitivity to 91% at a specificity of 68% as compared to 85% and 54% for CA-125 alone. Conclusions Our results indicates that up to one third of benign cases can be identified by molecular measures thereby reducing the need for diagnostic surgery.https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-025-00945-0
spellingShingle Mikaela Moskov
Julia Hedlund Lindberg
Maria Lycke
Emma Ivansson
Ulf Gyllensten
Karin Sundfeldt
Karin Stålberg
Stefan Enroth
Deep plasma proteomics identifies and validates an eight-protein biomarker panel that separate benign from malignant tumors in ovarian cancer
Communications Medicine
title Deep plasma proteomics identifies and validates an eight-protein biomarker panel that separate benign from malignant tumors in ovarian cancer
title_full Deep plasma proteomics identifies and validates an eight-protein biomarker panel that separate benign from malignant tumors in ovarian cancer
title_fullStr Deep plasma proteomics identifies and validates an eight-protein biomarker panel that separate benign from malignant tumors in ovarian cancer
title_full_unstemmed Deep plasma proteomics identifies and validates an eight-protein biomarker panel that separate benign from malignant tumors in ovarian cancer
title_short Deep plasma proteomics identifies and validates an eight-protein biomarker panel that separate benign from malignant tumors in ovarian cancer
title_sort deep plasma proteomics identifies and validates an eight protein biomarker panel that separate benign from malignant tumors in ovarian cancer
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-025-00945-0
work_keys_str_mv AT mikaelamoskov deepplasmaproteomicsidentifiesandvalidatesaneightproteinbiomarkerpanelthatseparatebenignfrommalignanttumorsinovariancancer
AT juliahedlundlindberg deepplasmaproteomicsidentifiesandvalidatesaneightproteinbiomarkerpanelthatseparatebenignfrommalignanttumorsinovariancancer
AT marialycke deepplasmaproteomicsidentifiesandvalidatesaneightproteinbiomarkerpanelthatseparatebenignfrommalignanttumorsinovariancancer
AT emmaivansson deepplasmaproteomicsidentifiesandvalidatesaneightproteinbiomarkerpanelthatseparatebenignfrommalignanttumorsinovariancancer
AT ulfgyllensten deepplasmaproteomicsidentifiesandvalidatesaneightproteinbiomarkerpanelthatseparatebenignfrommalignanttumorsinovariancancer
AT karinsundfeldt deepplasmaproteomicsidentifiesandvalidatesaneightproteinbiomarkerpanelthatseparatebenignfrommalignanttumorsinovariancancer
AT karinstalberg deepplasmaproteomicsidentifiesandvalidatesaneightproteinbiomarkerpanelthatseparatebenignfrommalignanttumorsinovariancancer
AT stefanenroth deepplasmaproteomicsidentifiesandvalidatesaneightproteinbiomarkerpanelthatseparatebenignfrommalignanttumorsinovariancancer