“What ails victimology?” Revisited: Assessing the growth and development of victimology as an academic discipline

More than fifteen years have passed since Jaishankar (2008) published the editorial, “What ails Victimology?” in the International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, in which he outlined his perceptions of why victimology has struggled to be recognized as a distinct academic discipline....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Beichner-Thomas Dawn, James Chadley, Piason Bothwell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Victimology Society of Serbia and University of Belgrade, Faculty of Special Education and Rehabilitation 2025-01-01
Series:Temida
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/1450-6637/2025/1450-66372501127B.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849245630908596224
author Beichner-Thomas Dawn
James Chadley
Piason Bothwell
author_facet Beichner-Thomas Dawn
James Chadley
Piason Bothwell
author_sort Beichner-Thomas Dawn
collection DOAJ
description More than fifteen years have passed since Jaishankar (2008) published the editorial, “What ails Victimology?” in the International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, in which he outlined his perceptions of why victimology has struggled to be recognized as a distinct academic discipline. We revisit the five areas outlined in Jaishankar’s (2008) argument and explore the growth of the victimology discipline over the past decade and a half. The exploration considers theoretical development, content of published scholarly journal articles, courses, curricular programs, published academic books, and peer-reviewed journals, from 2008 to 2023. It is concluded that most of the “symptomatic failings” that Jaishankar (2008: 2) outlined as hampering the growth of victimology seem to be resolved, including concerns about acceptance of the discipline in the larger international community. However, there is room for new theoretical developments in victimology and more graduate-level degree programs.
format Article
id doaj-art-90aea77d9ccd4b6196c57f86b106eeeb
institution Kabale University
issn 1450-6637
2406-0941
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Victimology Society of Serbia and University of Belgrade, Faculty of Special Education and Rehabilitation
record_format Article
series Temida
spelling doaj-art-90aea77d9ccd4b6196c57f86b106eeeb2025-08-20T03:58:45ZengVictimology Society of Serbia and University of Belgrade, Faculty of Special Education and RehabilitationTemida1450-66372406-09412025-01-0128112716210.2298/TEM2501127B1450-66372501127B“What ails victimology?” Revisited: Assessing the growth and development of victimology as an academic disciplineBeichner-Thomas Dawn0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8849-1673James Chadley1Piason Bothwell2https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5416-4040Department of Criminal Justice Sciences and the Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Program, Illinois State University, United States of AmericaDepartment of Criminology, California State University - Fresno, United States of AmericaSchool of Criminology and Criminal Justice, ArizonaState University, United States of AmericaMore than fifteen years have passed since Jaishankar (2008) published the editorial, “What ails Victimology?” in the International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, in which he outlined his perceptions of why victimology has struggled to be recognized as a distinct academic discipline. We revisit the five areas outlined in Jaishankar’s (2008) argument and explore the growth of the victimology discipline over the past decade and a half. The exploration considers theoretical development, content of published scholarly journal articles, courses, curricular programs, published academic books, and peer-reviewed journals, from 2008 to 2023. It is concluded that most of the “symptomatic failings” that Jaishankar (2008: 2) outlined as hampering the growth of victimology seem to be resolved, including concerns about acceptance of the discipline in the larger international community. However, there is room for new theoretical developments in victimology and more graduate-level degree programs.https://doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/1450-6637/2025/1450-66372501127B.pdfvictimologyscholarshipteachingvictimology disciplinetheory
spellingShingle Beichner-Thomas Dawn
James Chadley
Piason Bothwell
“What ails victimology?” Revisited: Assessing the growth and development of victimology as an academic discipline
Temida
victimology
scholarship
teaching
victimology discipline
theory
title “What ails victimology?” Revisited: Assessing the growth and development of victimology as an academic discipline
title_full “What ails victimology?” Revisited: Assessing the growth and development of victimology as an academic discipline
title_fullStr “What ails victimology?” Revisited: Assessing the growth and development of victimology as an academic discipline
title_full_unstemmed “What ails victimology?” Revisited: Assessing the growth and development of victimology as an academic discipline
title_short “What ails victimology?” Revisited: Assessing the growth and development of victimology as an academic discipline
title_sort what ails victimology revisited assessing the growth and development of victimology as an academic discipline
topic victimology
scholarship
teaching
victimology discipline
theory
url https://doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/1450-6637/2025/1450-66372501127B.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT beichnerthomasdawn whatailsvictimologyrevisitedassessingthegrowthanddevelopmentofvictimologyasanacademicdiscipline
AT jameschadley whatailsvictimologyrevisitedassessingthegrowthanddevelopmentofvictimologyasanacademicdiscipline
AT piasonbothwell whatailsvictimologyrevisitedassessingthegrowthanddevelopmentofvictimologyasanacademicdiscipline