Delivery Parameter Variations and Early Clinical Outcomes of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for 31 Prostate Cancer Patients: An Intercomparison of Three Treatment Planning Systems
We created volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for 31 prostate cancer patients using one of three treatment planning systems (TPSs)—ERGO++, Monaco, or Pinnacle—and then treated those patients. A dose of 74 Gy was prescribed to the planning target volume (PTV). The rectum, bladder, and femu...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2013-01-01
|
Series: | The Scientific World Journal |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/289809 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832558877792534528 |
---|---|
author | Shinichi Tsutsumi Masako N. Hosono Daisaku Tatsumi Yoshitaka Miki Yutaka Masuoka Ryo Ogino Kentaro Ishii Yasuhiko Shimatani Yukio Miki |
author_facet | Shinichi Tsutsumi Masako N. Hosono Daisaku Tatsumi Yoshitaka Miki Yutaka Masuoka Ryo Ogino Kentaro Ishii Yasuhiko Shimatani Yukio Miki |
author_sort | Shinichi Tsutsumi |
collection | DOAJ |
description | We created volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for 31 prostate cancer patients using one of three treatment planning systems (TPSs)—ERGO++, Monaco, or Pinnacle—and then treated those patients. A dose of 74 Gy was prescribed to the planning target volume (PTV). The rectum, bladder, and femur were chosen as organs at risk (OARs) with specified dose-volume constraints. Dose volume histograms (DVHs), the mean dose rate, the beam-on time, and early treatment outcomes were evaluated and compared. The DVHs calculated for the three TPSs were comparable. The mean dose rates and beam-on times for Ergo++, Monaco, and SmartArc were, respectively, 174.3 ± 17.7, 149.7 ± 8.4, and 185.8 ± 15.6 MU/min and 132.7 ± 8.4, 217.6 ± 13.1, and 127.5 ± 27.1 sec. During a follow-up period of 486.2 ± 289.9 days, local recurrence was not observed, but distant metastasis was observed in a single patient. Adverse events of grade 3 to grade 4 were not observed. The mean dose rate for Monaco was significantly lower than that for ERGO++ and SmartArc (P<0.0001), and the beam-on time for Monaco was significantly longer than that for ERGO++ and SmartArc (P<0.0001). Each TPS was successfully used for prostate VMAT planning without significant differences in early clinical outcomes despite significant TPS-specific delivery parameter variations. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-90997491b6e24d06a247c3df30678f62 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1537-744X |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | The Scientific World Journal |
spelling | doaj-art-90997491b6e24d06a247c3df30678f622025-02-03T01:31:27ZengWileyThe Scientific World Journal1537-744X2013-01-01201310.1155/2013/289809289809Delivery Parameter Variations and Early Clinical Outcomes of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for 31 Prostate Cancer Patients: An Intercomparison of Three Treatment Planning SystemsShinichi Tsutsumi0Masako N. Hosono1Daisaku Tatsumi2Yoshitaka Miki3Yutaka Masuoka4Ryo Ogino5Kentaro Ishii6Yasuhiko Shimatani7Yukio Miki8Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Osaka City University, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka 545-8585, JapanDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Osaka City University, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka 545-8585, JapanDepartment of Radiology, Osaka City University Hospital, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka 545-8585, JapanDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Osaka City University, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka 545-8585, JapanDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Osaka City University, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka 545-8585, JapanDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Osaka City University, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka 545-8585, JapanTane Hospital, 1-12-21, Kujo-Minami, Nishi-ku, Osaka 550-0025, JapanDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Osaka City University, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka 545-8585, JapanDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, Osaka City University, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka 545-8585, JapanWe created volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for 31 prostate cancer patients using one of three treatment planning systems (TPSs)—ERGO++, Monaco, or Pinnacle—and then treated those patients. A dose of 74 Gy was prescribed to the planning target volume (PTV). The rectum, bladder, and femur were chosen as organs at risk (OARs) with specified dose-volume constraints. Dose volume histograms (DVHs), the mean dose rate, the beam-on time, and early treatment outcomes were evaluated and compared. The DVHs calculated for the three TPSs were comparable. The mean dose rates and beam-on times for Ergo++, Monaco, and SmartArc were, respectively, 174.3 ± 17.7, 149.7 ± 8.4, and 185.8 ± 15.6 MU/min and 132.7 ± 8.4, 217.6 ± 13.1, and 127.5 ± 27.1 sec. During a follow-up period of 486.2 ± 289.9 days, local recurrence was not observed, but distant metastasis was observed in a single patient. Adverse events of grade 3 to grade 4 were not observed. The mean dose rate for Monaco was significantly lower than that for ERGO++ and SmartArc (P<0.0001), and the beam-on time for Monaco was significantly longer than that for ERGO++ and SmartArc (P<0.0001). Each TPS was successfully used for prostate VMAT planning without significant differences in early clinical outcomes despite significant TPS-specific delivery parameter variations.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/289809 |
spellingShingle | Shinichi Tsutsumi Masako N. Hosono Daisaku Tatsumi Yoshitaka Miki Yutaka Masuoka Ryo Ogino Kentaro Ishii Yasuhiko Shimatani Yukio Miki Delivery Parameter Variations and Early Clinical Outcomes of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for 31 Prostate Cancer Patients: An Intercomparison of Three Treatment Planning Systems The Scientific World Journal |
title | Delivery Parameter Variations and Early Clinical Outcomes of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for 31 Prostate Cancer Patients: An Intercomparison of Three Treatment Planning Systems |
title_full | Delivery Parameter Variations and Early Clinical Outcomes of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for 31 Prostate Cancer Patients: An Intercomparison of Three Treatment Planning Systems |
title_fullStr | Delivery Parameter Variations and Early Clinical Outcomes of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for 31 Prostate Cancer Patients: An Intercomparison of Three Treatment Planning Systems |
title_full_unstemmed | Delivery Parameter Variations and Early Clinical Outcomes of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for 31 Prostate Cancer Patients: An Intercomparison of Three Treatment Planning Systems |
title_short | Delivery Parameter Variations and Early Clinical Outcomes of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for 31 Prostate Cancer Patients: An Intercomparison of Three Treatment Planning Systems |
title_sort | delivery parameter variations and early clinical outcomes of volumetric modulated arc therapy for 31 prostate cancer patients an intercomparison of three treatment planning systems |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/289809 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shinichitsutsumi deliveryparametervariationsandearlyclinicaloutcomesofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyfor31prostatecancerpatientsanintercomparisonofthreetreatmentplanningsystems AT masakonhosono deliveryparametervariationsandearlyclinicaloutcomesofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyfor31prostatecancerpatientsanintercomparisonofthreetreatmentplanningsystems AT daisakutatsumi deliveryparametervariationsandearlyclinicaloutcomesofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyfor31prostatecancerpatientsanintercomparisonofthreetreatmentplanningsystems AT yoshitakamiki deliveryparametervariationsandearlyclinicaloutcomesofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyfor31prostatecancerpatientsanintercomparisonofthreetreatmentplanningsystems AT yutakamasuoka deliveryparametervariationsandearlyclinicaloutcomesofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyfor31prostatecancerpatientsanintercomparisonofthreetreatmentplanningsystems AT ryoogino deliveryparametervariationsandearlyclinicaloutcomesofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyfor31prostatecancerpatientsanintercomparisonofthreetreatmentplanningsystems AT kentaroishii deliveryparametervariationsandearlyclinicaloutcomesofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyfor31prostatecancerpatientsanintercomparisonofthreetreatmentplanningsystems AT yasuhikoshimatani deliveryparametervariationsandearlyclinicaloutcomesofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyfor31prostatecancerpatientsanintercomparisonofthreetreatmentplanningsystems AT yukiomiki deliveryparametervariationsandearlyclinicaloutcomesofvolumetricmodulatedarctherapyfor31prostatecancerpatientsanintercomparisonofthreetreatmentplanningsystems |