Spatiotemporal risk avoidance varies seasonally, relative to risk intensity, in a reestablishing predator–prey system

Predation establishes risk, which can indirectly influence prey behavior and ecology. We evaluated the influence of Mexican gray wolves (Canis lupus baileyi) on habitat selection and spatiotemporal predator avoidance strategies of elk (Cervus canadensis). We fit 866 adult female elk with GPS collars...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cara J. Thompson, Nicole M. Tatman, Zachary J. Farley, Scott T. Boyle, Allison R. Greenleaf, James W. Cain
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2025.1613904/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849318131596525568
author Cara J. Thompson
Nicole M. Tatman
Zachary J. Farley
Scott T. Boyle
Scott T. Boyle
Allison R. Greenleaf
James W. Cain
author_facet Cara J. Thompson
Nicole M. Tatman
Zachary J. Farley
Scott T. Boyle
Scott T. Boyle
Allison R. Greenleaf
James W. Cain
author_sort Cara J. Thompson
collection DOAJ
description Predation establishes risk, which can indirectly influence prey behavior and ecology. We evaluated the influence of Mexican gray wolves (Canis lupus baileyi) on habitat selection and spatiotemporal predator avoidance strategies of elk (Cervus canadensis). We fit 866 adult female elk with GPS collars across areas of varying wolf densities within the Mexican wolf experimental population area of eastern Arizona and western New Mexico between 2019−2021. Using step-selection functions we examined relative intensity of elk use in relation to landscape attributes, estimated predator/prey diel activity, and measures of risk. Risk metrics included predicted wolf presence, habitat openness, and predicted risky places modeled from attributes of locations where wolves killed elk. Wolf activity varied across seasons and increased midday and night in fall and monsoon seasons. Relative use by elk was best explained by incorporating an interaction between diel period and predicted risky places across all seasons. Elk utilized risky places more in times of nutritional deficit associated with high energetic demands of the third trimester pregnancy and lactation and when forage quality was best, during spring and monsoon season. Particularly, use of risky places increased at less risky times in areas with more established wolf presence, suggesting use of risky places varied relative to exposure to Mexican wolves. These behaviors highlight the importance of temporal avoidance when predators and prey are highly mobile and largely overlap in space. Our research suggests temporally responding to predictable and relatively static environmental characteristics associated with encounter and kill rates may better balance energetic trade-offs than anticipating changes in wolf activity or spatially avoiding areas with higher wolf presence. Thus, elk appear to be more willing to take chances and mitigate cursorial predation risk with a more immediate, reactive approach and make proactive trade-offs during the seasons they can best increase fitness.
format Article
id doaj-art-90798d24d2b24136a89dcafb3b5c1843
institution Kabale University
issn 2296-701X
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
spelling doaj-art-90798d24d2b24136a89dcafb3b5c18432025-08-20T03:50:59ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution2296-701X2025-07-011310.3389/fevo.2025.16139041613904Spatiotemporal risk avoidance varies seasonally, relative to risk intensity, in a reestablishing predator–prey systemCara J. Thompson0Nicole M. Tatman1Zachary J. Farley2Scott T. Boyle3Scott T. Boyle4Allison R. Greenleaf5James W. Cain6Department of Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Ecology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, United StatesNew Mexico Department of Game and Fish, Santa Fe, NM, United StatesDepartment of Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Ecology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, United StatesDepartment of Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Ecology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, United StatesDepartment of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, United StatesU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Southwest Regional Headquarters, Albuquerque, NM, United StatesU.S. Geological Survey, New Mexico Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, United StatesPredation establishes risk, which can indirectly influence prey behavior and ecology. We evaluated the influence of Mexican gray wolves (Canis lupus baileyi) on habitat selection and spatiotemporal predator avoidance strategies of elk (Cervus canadensis). We fit 866 adult female elk with GPS collars across areas of varying wolf densities within the Mexican wolf experimental population area of eastern Arizona and western New Mexico between 2019−2021. Using step-selection functions we examined relative intensity of elk use in relation to landscape attributes, estimated predator/prey diel activity, and measures of risk. Risk metrics included predicted wolf presence, habitat openness, and predicted risky places modeled from attributes of locations where wolves killed elk. Wolf activity varied across seasons and increased midday and night in fall and monsoon seasons. Relative use by elk was best explained by incorporating an interaction between diel period and predicted risky places across all seasons. Elk utilized risky places more in times of nutritional deficit associated with high energetic demands of the third trimester pregnancy and lactation and when forage quality was best, during spring and monsoon season. Particularly, use of risky places increased at less risky times in areas with more established wolf presence, suggesting use of risky places varied relative to exposure to Mexican wolves. These behaviors highlight the importance of temporal avoidance when predators and prey are highly mobile and largely overlap in space. Our research suggests temporally responding to predictable and relatively static environmental characteristics associated with encounter and kill rates may better balance energetic trade-offs than anticipating changes in wolf activity or spatially avoiding areas with higher wolf presence. Thus, elk appear to be more willing to take chances and mitigate cursorial predation risk with a more immediate, reactive approach and make proactive trade-offs during the seasons they can best increase fitness.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2025.1613904/fullantipredator behaviorCanis lupuslandscape of fearpredation riskpredator–prey interactionspredator restoration
spellingShingle Cara J. Thompson
Nicole M. Tatman
Zachary J. Farley
Scott T. Boyle
Scott T. Boyle
Allison R. Greenleaf
James W. Cain
Spatiotemporal risk avoidance varies seasonally, relative to risk intensity, in a reestablishing predator–prey system
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
antipredator behavior
Canis lupus
landscape of fear
predation risk
predator–prey interactions
predator restoration
title Spatiotemporal risk avoidance varies seasonally, relative to risk intensity, in a reestablishing predator–prey system
title_full Spatiotemporal risk avoidance varies seasonally, relative to risk intensity, in a reestablishing predator–prey system
title_fullStr Spatiotemporal risk avoidance varies seasonally, relative to risk intensity, in a reestablishing predator–prey system
title_full_unstemmed Spatiotemporal risk avoidance varies seasonally, relative to risk intensity, in a reestablishing predator–prey system
title_short Spatiotemporal risk avoidance varies seasonally, relative to risk intensity, in a reestablishing predator–prey system
title_sort spatiotemporal risk avoidance varies seasonally relative to risk intensity in a reestablishing predator prey system
topic antipredator behavior
Canis lupus
landscape of fear
predation risk
predator–prey interactions
predator restoration
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2025.1613904/full
work_keys_str_mv AT carajthompson spatiotemporalriskavoidancevariesseasonallyrelativetoriskintensityinareestablishingpredatorpreysystem
AT nicolemtatman spatiotemporalriskavoidancevariesseasonallyrelativetoriskintensityinareestablishingpredatorpreysystem
AT zacharyjfarley spatiotemporalriskavoidancevariesseasonallyrelativetoriskintensityinareestablishingpredatorpreysystem
AT scotttboyle spatiotemporalriskavoidancevariesseasonallyrelativetoriskintensityinareestablishingpredatorpreysystem
AT scotttboyle spatiotemporalriskavoidancevariesseasonallyrelativetoriskintensityinareestablishingpredatorpreysystem
AT allisonrgreenleaf spatiotemporalriskavoidancevariesseasonallyrelativetoriskintensityinareestablishingpredatorpreysystem
AT jameswcain spatiotemporalriskavoidancevariesseasonallyrelativetoriskintensityinareestablishingpredatorpreysystem