Impact of Asymmetric Carbon Information on Supply Chain Decisions under Low-Carbon Policies
Through the establishment of the leading manufacturer Stackelberg game model under asymmetric carbon information, this paper investigates the misreporting behaviors of the supply chain members and their influences on supply chain performance. Based on “Benchmarking” allocation mechanism, three polic...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2016-01-01
|
| Series: | Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1369589 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850211717202575360 |
|---|---|
| author | Lei Yang Jingna Ji Chenshi Zheng |
| author_facet | Lei Yang Jingna Ji Chenshi Zheng |
| author_sort | Lei Yang |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Through the establishment of the leading manufacturer Stackelberg game model under asymmetric carbon information, this paper investigates the misreporting behaviors of the supply chain members and their influences on supply chain performance. Based on “Benchmarking” allocation mechanism, three policies are considered: carbon emission trading, carbon tax, and a new policy which combined carbon quota and carbon tax mechanism. The results show that, in the three models, the leader in the supply chain, even if he has advantages of carbon information, will not lie about his information. That is because the manufacturer’s misreporting behavior has no effect on supply chain members’ performance. But the retailer will lie about the information when he has carbon information advantage. The high-carbon-emission retailers under the carbon trading policy, all the retailers under the carbon tax policy, and the high-carbon-emission retailers under combined quotas and tax policy would like to understate their carbon emissions. Coordination of revenue sharing contract is studied in supply chain to induce the retailer to declare his real carbon information. Optimal contractual parameters are deduced in the three models, under which the profit of the supply chain can be maximized. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-901cbef67e024082bf67b6620c8a501b |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1026-0226 1607-887X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2016-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society |
| spelling | doaj-art-901cbef67e024082bf67b6620c8a501b2025-08-20T02:09:30ZengWileyDiscrete Dynamics in Nature and Society1026-02261607-887X2016-01-01201610.1155/2016/13695891369589Impact of Asymmetric Carbon Information on Supply Chain Decisions under Low-Carbon PoliciesLei Yang0Jingna Ji1Chenshi Zheng2School of Economics and Commerce, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510006, ChinaSchool of Economics and Commerce, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510006, ChinaSchool of Economics and Commerce, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510006, ChinaThrough the establishment of the leading manufacturer Stackelberg game model under asymmetric carbon information, this paper investigates the misreporting behaviors of the supply chain members and their influences on supply chain performance. Based on “Benchmarking” allocation mechanism, three policies are considered: carbon emission trading, carbon tax, and a new policy which combined carbon quota and carbon tax mechanism. The results show that, in the three models, the leader in the supply chain, even if he has advantages of carbon information, will not lie about his information. That is because the manufacturer’s misreporting behavior has no effect on supply chain members’ performance. But the retailer will lie about the information when he has carbon information advantage. The high-carbon-emission retailers under the carbon trading policy, all the retailers under the carbon tax policy, and the high-carbon-emission retailers under combined quotas and tax policy would like to understate their carbon emissions. Coordination of revenue sharing contract is studied in supply chain to induce the retailer to declare his real carbon information. Optimal contractual parameters are deduced in the three models, under which the profit of the supply chain can be maximized.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1369589 |
| spellingShingle | Lei Yang Jingna Ji Chenshi Zheng Impact of Asymmetric Carbon Information on Supply Chain Decisions under Low-Carbon Policies Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society |
| title | Impact of Asymmetric Carbon Information on Supply Chain Decisions under Low-Carbon Policies |
| title_full | Impact of Asymmetric Carbon Information on Supply Chain Decisions under Low-Carbon Policies |
| title_fullStr | Impact of Asymmetric Carbon Information on Supply Chain Decisions under Low-Carbon Policies |
| title_full_unstemmed | Impact of Asymmetric Carbon Information on Supply Chain Decisions under Low-Carbon Policies |
| title_short | Impact of Asymmetric Carbon Information on Supply Chain Decisions under Low-Carbon Policies |
| title_sort | impact of asymmetric carbon information on supply chain decisions under low carbon policies |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1369589 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT leiyang impactofasymmetriccarboninformationonsupplychaindecisionsunderlowcarbonpolicies AT jingnaji impactofasymmetriccarboninformationonsupplychaindecisionsunderlowcarbonpolicies AT chenshizheng impactofasymmetriccarboninformationonsupplychaindecisionsunderlowcarbonpolicies |