Looking ahead! the feasibility of implementing remote patient monitoring for high-risk oncology patients
Abstract Background The goal of posthospital care delivery is to improve patient access to providers and prevent unnecessary readmissions. This study assessed the feasibility, barriers, and facilitating factors of implementing remote patient monitoring (RPM) for oncology patients at the Hartford Hea...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2025-07-01
|
| Series: | BMC Health Services Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12947-8 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849238775498014720 |
|---|---|
| author | AnnMarie Mazzella-Ebstein Hayley Dunnack-Yackel Robert Michael Daly Andrew L. Salner Mary Kate Eanniello Sara Fontaine Jennie Huang Camila Bernal Clare Wilhelm Jill Ackerman Katherine S. Panageas Gilad Kuperman Jun Mao Margaret Barton-Burke |
| author_facet | AnnMarie Mazzella-Ebstein Hayley Dunnack-Yackel Robert Michael Daly Andrew L. Salner Mary Kate Eanniello Sara Fontaine Jennie Huang Camila Bernal Clare Wilhelm Jill Ackerman Katherine S. Panageas Gilad Kuperman Jun Mao Margaret Barton-Burke |
| author_sort | AnnMarie Mazzella-Ebstein |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background The goal of posthospital care delivery is to improve patient access to providers and prevent unnecessary readmissions. This study assessed the feasibility, barriers, and facilitating factors of implementing remote patient monitoring (RPM) for oncology patients at the Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute (HHC), Hartford CT, and a state-wide healthcare system. Methods A multi-model holistic approach to quantitative surveys, and qualitative interviews and focus groups were used to collect insights from hospital stakeholders about the culture, learning, leadership, and resources for implementing RPM. Stakeholders from HHC responded to the survey between September 1st through September 30th, 2022. The frequency and percentage distributions for survey item responses were calculated. Items with the highest percentage and frequency of neutral and disagreement responses informed the interview guide. A purposeful sample of hospital stakeholders and patients were recruited for interviews and focus groups, which were conducted from January 1st through January 30th, 2023. Current and future state organizational maps of clinical care models and processes were developed. Results Sixty-three stakeholders were sent the Readiness for Implementation Survey and 53 responded through an email link to a web-based database (84% response rate). Responses supported RPM to improve patient care (67%). Interviews and focus groups elicited stakeholder perceptions of implementing change, the change climate, available resources, and barriers and facilitators of RPM. Stakeholders (n = 78), inclusive of the 63 survey recipients, plus 15 stakeholders from the Cancer Patient and Family Advisory Council (PFAC) and hospital staff, agreed to participate in interviews and focus groups. Fifty-two individuals (67% response rate) agreed to participate. Eight individual interviews and 6 focus groups were conducted. The emerged themes included integrating change into hospital systems, relevance to patient care teams, and patient- and family-centered care. Subthemes were subsequently explored. Conclusion Stakeholders endorsed using RPM to improve communication among providers and patients’ access to care. Providers underscored key elements for program success that include a designated intervention team, strategies to assess symptom alerts, and an enterprise-wide availability of clinical data in future RPM development. Patient stakeholders emphasized integrating a patient-centered approach to RPM development. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-901198e82ff0427ca44e5ddd6e07eaa9 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1472-6963 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-07-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Health Services Research |
| spelling | doaj-art-901198e82ff0427ca44e5ddd6e07eaa92025-08-20T04:01:24ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632025-07-0125111010.1186/s12913-025-12947-8Looking ahead! the feasibility of implementing remote patient monitoring for high-risk oncology patientsAnnMarie Mazzella-Ebstein0Hayley Dunnack-Yackel1Robert Michael Daly2Andrew L. Salner3Mary Kate Eanniello4Sara Fontaine5Jennie Huang6Camila Bernal7Clare Wilhelm8Jill Ackerman9Katherine S. Panageas10Gilad Kuperman11Jun Mao12Margaret Barton-Burke13Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterHartford Health Care Cancer InstituteMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterHartford Health Care Cancer InstituteHartford Health Care Cancer InstituteHartford Health Care Cancer InstituteMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterAbstract Background The goal of posthospital care delivery is to improve patient access to providers and prevent unnecessary readmissions. This study assessed the feasibility, barriers, and facilitating factors of implementing remote patient monitoring (RPM) for oncology patients at the Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute (HHC), Hartford CT, and a state-wide healthcare system. Methods A multi-model holistic approach to quantitative surveys, and qualitative interviews and focus groups were used to collect insights from hospital stakeholders about the culture, learning, leadership, and resources for implementing RPM. Stakeholders from HHC responded to the survey between September 1st through September 30th, 2022. The frequency and percentage distributions for survey item responses were calculated. Items with the highest percentage and frequency of neutral and disagreement responses informed the interview guide. A purposeful sample of hospital stakeholders and patients were recruited for interviews and focus groups, which were conducted from January 1st through January 30th, 2023. Current and future state organizational maps of clinical care models and processes were developed. Results Sixty-three stakeholders were sent the Readiness for Implementation Survey and 53 responded through an email link to a web-based database (84% response rate). Responses supported RPM to improve patient care (67%). Interviews and focus groups elicited stakeholder perceptions of implementing change, the change climate, available resources, and barriers and facilitators of RPM. Stakeholders (n = 78), inclusive of the 63 survey recipients, plus 15 stakeholders from the Cancer Patient and Family Advisory Council (PFAC) and hospital staff, agreed to participate in interviews and focus groups. Fifty-two individuals (67% response rate) agreed to participate. Eight individual interviews and 6 focus groups were conducted. The emerged themes included integrating change into hospital systems, relevance to patient care teams, and patient- and family-centered care. Subthemes were subsequently explored. Conclusion Stakeholders endorsed using RPM to improve communication among providers and patients’ access to care. Providers underscored key elements for program success that include a designated intervention team, strategies to assess symptom alerts, and an enterprise-wide availability of clinical data in future RPM development. Patient stakeholders emphasized integrating a patient-centered approach to RPM development.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12947-8OncologyCancerRemote patient monitoringUsabilityFeasibilityStakeholders |
| spellingShingle | AnnMarie Mazzella-Ebstein Hayley Dunnack-Yackel Robert Michael Daly Andrew L. Salner Mary Kate Eanniello Sara Fontaine Jennie Huang Camila Bernal Clare Wilhelm Jill Ackerman Katherine S. Panageas Gilad Kuperman Jun Mao Margaret Barton-Burke Looking ahead! the feasibility of implementing remote patient monitoring for high-risk oncology patients BMC Health Services Research Oncology Cancer Remote patient monitoring Usability Feasibility Stakeholders |
| title | Looking ahead! the feasibility of implementing remote patient monitoring for high-risk oncology patients |
| title_full | Looking ahead! the feasibility of implementing remote patient monitoring for high-risk oncology patients |
| title_fullStr | Looking ahead! the feasibility of implementing remote patient monitoring for high-risk oncology patients |
| title_full_unstemmed | Looking ahead! the feasibility of implementing remote patient monitoring for high-risk oncology patients |
| title_short | Looking ahead! the feasibility of implementing remote patient monitoring for high-risk oncology patients |
| title_sort | looking ahead the feasibility of implementing remote patient monitoring for high risk oncology patients |
| topic | Oncology Cancer Remote patient monitoring Usability Feasibility Stakeholders |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12947-8 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT annmariemazzellaebstein lookingaheadthefeasibilityofimplementingremotepatientmonitoringforhighriskoncologypatients AT hayleydunnackyackel lookingaheadthefeasibilityofimplementingremotepatientmonitoringforhighriskoncologypatients AT robertmichaeldaly lookingaheadthefeasibilityofimplementingremotepatientmonitoringforhighriskoncologypatients AT andrewlsalner lookingaheadthefeasibilityofimplementingremotepatientmonitoringforhighriskoncologypatients AT marykateeanniello lookingaheadthefeasibilityofimplementingremotepatientmonitoringforhighriskoncologypatients AT sarafontaine lookingaheadthefeasibilityofimplementingremotepatientmonitoringforhighriskoncologypatients AT jenniehuang lookingaheadthefeasibilityofimplementingremotepatientmonitoringforhighriskoncologypatients AT camilabernal lookingaheadthefeasibilityofimplementingremotepatientmonitoringforhighriskoncologypatients AT clarewilhelm lookingaheadthefeasibilityofimplementingremotepatientmonitoringforhighriskoncologypatients AT jillackerman lookingaheadthefeasibilityofimplementingremotepatientmonitoringforhighriskoncologypatients AT katherinespanageas lookingaheadthefeasibilityofimplementingremotepatientmonitoringforhighriskoncologypatients AT giladkuperman lookingaheadthefeasibilityofimplementingremotepatientmonitoringforhighriskoncologypatients AT junmao lookingaheadthefeasibilityofimplementingremotepatientmonitoringforhighriskoncologypatients AT margaretbartonburke lookingaheadthefeasibilityofimplementingremotepatientmonitoringforhighriskoncologypatients |